International Tax and Public Finance

, Volume 11, Issue 3, pp 313–331 | Cite as

The Welfare State in a Changing Environment

  • Thomas Eichner
  • Andreas Wagener


We analyse how the welfare state, i.e., social insurance that works through redistributive taxation, should respond to increases in risks and to increases in the cost of operating the welfare state. With respect to risks, we distinguish between risks that can be insured and such that cannot (background risks). Insurable risks can be reduced by costly individual self-insurance and by costly social insurance. We show: (i) Self-insurance will be higher the more costly is the welfare state and the larger are background or insured risks. (ii) Full social insurance can only be optimal in a costless welfare state. (iii) The optimal welfare state is not necessarily larger the less costly it is. (iv) The welfare state need not optimally expand when risks increase that it insures. (v) It should, however, expand when risks increase that it does not insure.

welfare state social insurance welfare cost background risks 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Adam, B., U. Beck and J. van Loon. (2000). The Risk Society and Beyond. London: Sage Publication.Google Scholar
  2. Agell, J. (2000). “On the Determinants of Labour Market Institutions: Rent-Sharing versus Social Insurance,” CESifo Working Paper No. 384, Munich.Google Scholar
  3. Andersen, T. M. (2002). “International Integration, Risk and the Welfare State,” Scandinavian Journal of Economics 104, 343–364.Google Scholar
  4. Andersen, T. M. (2003). “European Integration and the Welfare State,” Journal of Population Economics 16, 1–19.Google Scholar
  5. Barr, N. (1998). The Economics of the Welfare State, 3rd edn. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Beck, U. (1992). Risk Society. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  7. Bird, E. J. (2001). “Does the Welfare State Induce Risk-Taking?” Journal of Public Economics 80, 357–383.Google Scholar
  8. Boix, C. (2001). “Democracy, Development, and the Public Sector,” American Journal of Political Science 45, 1–17.Google Scholar
  9. Burgoon, B. (2001). “Globalization and Welfare Compensation: Disentangling the Ties that Bind,” International Organization 55, 509–551.Google Scholar
  10. Cheng, H.-C., M. J. Magill and W. J. Shafer. (1987). “Some Results on Comparative Statics under Uncertainty,” International Economic Review 28, 493–507.Google Scholar
  11. Dhami, S. (2002). “Optimal Consumption Taxes and Social Security Under Tax Measurement Problems and Uncertainty,” International Tax and Public Finances 9, 673–685.Google Scholar
  12. Eichner, T. and A. Wagener. (2003). “Variance Vulnerability, Background Risks, and Mean-Variance Preferences,” The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance Theory 28, 173–184.Google Scholar
  13. Gollier, C. and J. W. Pratt. (1996). “Risk Vulnerability and the Tempering Effect of Background Risk,” Econo-metrica 64, 1109–1123.Google Scholar
  14. Gottschalk, S. and W. Peters. (2003). “Redistributive Taxation in the Era of Globalization,” International Tax and Public Finances 10, 453–468.Google Scholar
  15. Guiso, L. and T. Jappelli. (1998). “Background Uncertainty and the Demand for Insurance Against Insurable Risks,” The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance Theory 23, 2–27.Google Scholar
  16. Guiso, L., T. Jappelli and D. Terlizzese. (1996). “Income Risk, Borrowing Constraints and Portfolio Choice,” American Economic Review 86, 158–172.Google Scholar
  17. Hadar, J. and T. K. Seo. (1992). “Changes in Risk and Insurance,” The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance Theorys 17, 171–179.Google Scholar
  18. Holzmann, R. and S. Jørgensen. (2001). “Social Risk Management: A New Conceptual Framework for Social Protection, and Beyond,” International Tax and Public Finance 8, 529–556.Google Scholar
  19. Huber, E. and J. D. Stephens. (2001), Development and Crisis of the Welfare State. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  20. Meyer, J. (1987). “Two-Moment Decision Models and Expected Utility Maximization,” American Economic Review 77, 421–430.Google Scholar
  21. Meyer, J. and M. B. Ormiston. (1995). “Demand for Insurance in a Portfolio Setting,” The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance Theory 20, 203–211.Google Scholar
  22. Mirrlees, J. A. (1990). “Taxing Uncertain Incomes,” Oxford Economic Papers 42, 34–45.Google Scholar
  23. Mossin, J. (1968). “Aspects of Rational Insurance Purchasing,” Journal of Political Economy 76, 553–568.Google Scholar
  24. Rodrik, D. (1997). Has Globalization Gone Too Far? Washington D.C.: Institute for International Economics.Google Scholar
  25. Rodrik, D. (1998). “Why Do More Open Economies Have Bigger Governments?” Journal of Political Economy 106, 997–1032.Google Scholar
  26. Sandmo, A. (1998). “The Welfare State: A Theoretical Framework for Justification and Criticism,” Swedish Economic Policy Review 5, 11–33.Google Scholar
  27. Shiller, R. J. (1993). Macro Markets.Creating Institutions for Managing Society's Largest Economic Risks. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Sinn, H.-W. (1983). Economic Decisions under Uncertainyt. North-Holland, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  29. Sinn, H.-W. (1990). “Expected Utility, µσ Preferences and Linear Distribution Classes: A Further Result,” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 3, 277–281.Google Scholar
  30. Sinn, H.-W. (1995). “A Theory of the Welfare State,” Scandinavian Journal of Economics 97, 495–526.Google Scholar
  31. Sinn, H.-W. (1996). “Social Insurance, Incentives and Risk-Taking,” International Tax and Public Finances 3, 259–280.Google Scholar
  32. Sinn, H.-W. (2003). The New Systems Competition. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  33. Smith, V. L. (1968). “Optimal Insurance Coverage,” Journal of Political Economy 76, 68–77.Google Scholar
  34. Tanzi, V. (2000). “Globalization and the Future of Social Protection,” IMF Working Paper 00/12. International Monetary Fund, Washington.Google Scholar
  35. Tibiletti, L. (1995). “Beneficial Changes in Random Variables via Copulas: An Application to Insurance,” The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance Theory 20, 191–202.Google Scholar
  36. Varian, H. (1980). “Redistributive Taxation as Social Insurance,” Journal of Public Economics 14, 49–68.Google Scholar
  37. Wagener, A. (2003). “Comparative Statics Under Uncertainty: The Case of Mean-Variance Preferences,” European Journal of Operational Researchs 151, 224–232.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Thomas Eichner
    • 1
  • Andreas Wagener
    • 2
  1. 1.VWL IVUniversity of SiegenSiegenGermany
  2. 2.Department of EconomicsUniversity of ViennaViennaAustria

Personalised recommendations