Advertisement

Interchange

, Volume 34, Issue 4, pp 363–381 | Cite as

Some Reflections On Contemporary Canadian Catholic Education

  • Mario O. D'Souza
Article
  • 93 Downloads

Abstract

Increasingly, Canadian Catholic education is identified according to theological and denominational distinctiveness. In the past, however, Catholic education was grounded upon an unambiguous philosophy of education, one that recognized education and teaching as primarily philosophical activities. Today, there is a noticeable absence of an identifiable Catholic philosophy of education, an absence that is particularly conspicuous in the pluralist and multi-faith makeup of Canada. In such a context, relying upon theological distinctiveness is insufficient. What is unique about Catholic education? What are some of the reasons that have led to the abandoning of a distinctively Catholic philosophy of education? Can such an education defend itself without identifying its unique philosophical and pedagogical principles? These, among others, are some of questions and issues of this paper.

Intellectual knowledge rational knowledge philosophical distinctiveness universal principles pluralism multiculturalism catholic education unit of knowledge philosophy of education epistemological distinctiveness 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Bloom, A. (1987). The closing of the American mind.New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  2. Buckley, M. (1998). The Catholic university as promise and project: Reflections in a Jesuit idiom.Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Clarke, W. (1990). Thomism and contemporary philosophical pluralism. The Modern Schoolma 67(2), 123–139.Google Scholar
  4. Congregation for Catholic Education. (1977). The Catholic school.Rome: The Congregation for Catholic Education.Google Scholar
  5. Congregation for Catholic Education. (1988). The religious dimension of education in a Catholic school: Guidelines for reflection and renewal.Rome: The Congregation for Catholic Education.Google Scholar
  6. Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education.New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  7. DiGiovani, C. (Ed). (1992). The philosophy of Catholic education. Ottawa, ON: Novalis. Google Scholar
  8. D'Souza, M. (1996). The preparation of teachers for Roman Catholic schools: Some philosophical first principles. Paideusis: Journal of the Canadian Philosophy of Education Society 9(2), 5–19.Google Scholar
  9. D'Souza, M. (2001). Experience, subjectivity, and Christian religious education: Canadian Catholic education in the 21st century The Journal of Educational Administration and Foundations 15(2), 11–25.Google Scholar
  10. Fitzpatrick, E. (1953). Philosophy of education.Milwaukee, WI: The Bruce Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  11. Flannery, A. (Ed.). (1996). The basic sixteen documents: Vatican Council II: Constitutions, decrees, declarations.Northport, NY: Costello Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  12. Freire, P. (1995). Pedagogy of the oppressed.New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
  13. Gallagher, P. (1985). Taking issue with Ken Westhues' Catholic separate schools: An ambiguous legacy. Grail 1(2), 6–11.Google Scholar
  14. Gilson, E. (1962) The philosopher and theology (C. Gilson, Trans). New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  15. Gulley, A. (1964). The educational philosophy of Saint Thomas Aquinas.New York: Pageant Press.Google Scholar
  16. Higgins, M., McGowan, B., Murphy, D., & Trafford, L. (Eds.). (1991). Catholic education: Transforming our world: A Canadian perspective.Ottawa, ON: Novalis.Google Scholar
  17. Landy, K. (2000, Sept. 7). End the bias against religious schools [Open letter to Janet Ecker Ontario Minister of Education]. The Globe and Mail, p. A19.Google Scholar
  18. Lonergan, B. (1993). Collected works of Bernard Lonergan: Topics in education (R. Doran & F. Crowe, Eds.). Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  19. MacDonald, K. (1989). Education in a multi-religious society. Grail 5(2), 19–29.Google Scholar
  20. Maritain, J. (1943). Education at the crossroads.New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Maritain, J. (1962). The education of man: The educational philosophy of Jacques Maritain (Eds. D. Gallagher & I. Gallagher). Westport, CT: Greenwood Press Publishers.Google Scholar
  22. Maritain, J. (1973). Integral humanism: Temporal and spiritual problems of a new Christendom.(J.W. Evans, Trans.). Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
  23. Matthews, C. (Ed.). (1977). Catholic schools in Canada.Toronto, ON: Canadian Catholic Trustees Association.Google Scholar
  24. McCool. G. (1989). From unity to pluralism: The internal evolution of Thomism.New York: Fordham University.Google Scholar
  25. McCool, G. (1990). Is Thomas' way of philosophizing still viable today? Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 64, 1–13.Google Scholar
  26. McCool, G. (1994). The Neo-Thomists. Milwaukee, WI: Marquette University Press.Google Scholar
  27. McLean, G. (Ed.). (1962). Philosophy and the integration of contemporary Catholic education.Washington: The Catholic University of America Press.Google Scholar
  28. Moran, G. (1986). Interest in philosophy: Three themes for religious education. Religious Education 81(3), 424–445.Google Scholar
  29. Mulligan, J. (1990). Evangelization and the Catholic high school: An agenda for the 1990's.Ottawa, ON: Novalis.Google Scholar
  30. Mulligan, J.(1994). Formation for evangelization: Reflections of a Catholic educator.Ottawa, ON: Novalis.Google Scholar
  31. Mulligan, J. (1999). Catholic education: The future is now.Foreword by Clare Fitzgerald. Ottawa, ON: Canada: Novalis.Google Scholar
  32. Murphy, D. (1991). Catholic education: Toward the third millennium. Grail 8(2), 68–91.Google Scholar
  33. O'Brien, D. (1994). From the heart of the American church: Catholic higher education and American culture.Maryknoll, NY: Orbis Books.Google Scholar
  34. Ontario Ministry of Education. (1999, November 5). Open statement from the Hon. Janet Ecker, Minister of Education (News Release). Toronto, ON: The Ministry of Education.Google Scholar
  35. Redden, J. & Ryan, F. (1949). A Catholic philosophy of education.Milwaukee, WI: The Bruce Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  36. Taylor, C. (1999). A Catholic modernity? With responses by William R. Shea, Rosemary Lulin Haighton, George Narsden, and Jean Bethke Elshtain.Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Trafford, L. (1993). What makes education Catholic? Grail 9(4), 27–49.Google Scholar
  38. Vandezande, G. (1997). Turning challenges into opportunities: Leadership in Catholic education. Grail 13(3), 51–73.Google Scholar
  39. Westhues, K. (1976). Public vs. sectarian legitimation: The separate schools of the Catholic Church. Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology 13, 137–151.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mario O. D'Souza
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of TheologyUniversity of St. Michael's CollegeToronto, OntarioCANADA

Personalised recommendations