Exploiting Curriculum Commonality in Small Island States: Some Strategies for Primary Science Curriculum Development in the South Pacific

  • Neil Taylor
  • Barend Vlaardingerbroek
  • Richard K. Coll


Improving primary science education in the small, developing island nations of the South Pacific is of increasing importance if these countries are to improve the quality of life of their citizens and achieve sustainable economic growth. The education systems in the South Pacific are commonly legacies of old colonial powers and are dominated by external summative examinations that drive a teacher-dominated didactic pedagogy. Changing this situation is likely to be a long-term issue. However, in the short to medium term science education at the primary level would likely benefit from some strategies that are achievable, sustainable and relatively inexpensive when compared with many aid-funded projects. The authors propose a regional approach to curriculum development and the employment of simple readers to deliver science concepts to students through literacy as a means of improving the current situation.

curriculum primary science science readers South Pacific 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Asoko, H. (1997). Reading for science learning. Primary Science Review, 50, 4–6.Google Scholar
  2. Basic Education and Literacy Support Programme (BELS) (1998). Annual report. Suva, Fiji: Institute of Education, University of the South Pacific.Google Scholar
  3. Bell, B. & Freyberg, P. (1985). Language in the science classroom. In R. Osborne & P. Freyberg, Learning in science. Auckland: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  4. Benavot, A. (1992). Curricular content, educational expansion, and economic growth. Comparative Education Review, 36(2), 150–174.Google Scholar
  5. Coll, R.K., Taylor, N. & Ali, S. (2002). Investigating tertiary level teacher-student interactions in Fiji using the Questionnaire on Teacher Interaction (QTI). Directions: Journal of Educational Studies (page numbers, etc. missing here).Google Scholar
  6. Coll, R.K., Taylor, N. & Fisher, D. (2002). The application of the Questionnaire on Teacher Interaction QTI and College and University Classroom Environment Inventory (CUCEI) instruments in a multicultural tertiary context. Research in Science and Technological Education, 20(2), 165–183.Google Scholar
  7. Cook, A. & Taylor, N. (1994). Robust adaptive processes: The case for laboratory technicians in Fiji schools. Journal of Science and Mathematics Education in South East Asia, 17(2), 7–15.Google Scholar
  8. Cook, A. & Taylor, N. (1995). The sustainability of aided curriculum development projects: The need for robust adaptive processes. Pacific-Asian Education Journal, 7(1–2), 67–71.Google Scholar
  9. Feasey, R. (1999). Primary science and literacy. Hatfield Harts, England: ASE.Google Scholar
  10. Finnegan, R. & Orbell, M. (1995). South Pacific oral traditions. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Griffith University (2002). Terms of reference of the Lautoka Teachers' College upgrade project. Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia.Google Scholar
  12. Hand, B. & Prain, V. (1995). Using writing to help improve students' understanding. Secondary Science Review, 77(278), 112–117.Google Scholar
  13. Hand, B., Prain, V., Lawrence, C. & Yore, D. (1999). A writing in science framework designed to enhance science literacy. International Journal of Science Education, 21(10), 1021–1035.Google Scholar
  14. Helu-Thaman, K. (1991). A letter from a curriculum officer. In C. Benson (Ed.), Report of the Pacific curriculum conference. March issue, 11–15, Suva, Fiji.Google Scholar
  15. Holiday, W.G., Yore, L.D. & Alvermann, D.F. (1994). The reading-science learningwriting conection: Breakthroughs, barriers and promises. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(2), 877–893.Google Scholar
  16. Ingle, R.B. & Turner, A.D. (1981). Science curricula as cultural misfits. European Journal of Science Education, 3, 357–371.Google Scholar
  17. Kennedy, T. (1980). Are there regional answers to the education problems of small island states. In R.T. Shand (Ed.), The island states of the Pacific and Indian Oceans: Anatomy of development (pp. 347–386). Canberra, Australia: Australian National University.Google Scholar
  18. Kulkarni, V.G. (1988). Role of language in science education. In P. Fensham (Ed.), Development and dilemmas in science education (pp. 150–167). London: Falmer.Google Scholar
  19. Lewin, K. (1993). Planning policy on science education in developing countries. International Journal of Science Education, 15(1), 1–15.Google Scholar
  20. Lewthwaite, B. (2000). Temporary or permanent changes: Training science teacher perceptions and reflections. In R.K. Coll (Ed.), SAME papers (pp. 110–127). Hamilton, New Zealand: Centre for Science and Technology Education Research.Google Scholar
  21. Liligeto, A.G. (2001). Perceptions of technology and technology education in Solomon Islands and Fiji. Unpublished PhD thesis. The University of Waikato: Hamilton, New Zealand.Google Scholar
  22. McKeon, F. (2000). Literacy and secondary science-building on the primary experience. Secondary Science Review, 81(297), 45–50.Google Scholar
  23. McMahon, K. (1999). A 'big book' project linking science and literacy. Primary Science Review, 59, 7–9.Google Scholar
  24. Montero-Sieburth, M. (1992). Strategies and practice of curriculum change in developing countries. Comparative Education Review, 36(2), 175–193.Google Scholar
  25. Muralidhar, S. (1989). An exploratory study of a science curriculum in action: Basic science in Fiji. Unpublished PhD thesis. Monash University: Melbourne, Australia.Google Scholar
  26. Muralidhar, S. (1991). The role of language in science education: Some reflections from Fiji. Research in Science Education, 21, 253–262.Google Scholar
  27. Newton, D.P. (2002). Talking sense in science. London: Routledge/Falmer.Google Scholar
  28. Postlethwaite, T.N. (1991). Achievement in science education in 1984 in 23 countries. In T. Husen & J.P. Keeves (Eds.), Issues in science education: Science competence in a social and ecological context (pp. 35–64). New York: Pergamon.Google Scholar
  29. Sade, D. & Coll, R.K. (in press). Solomon Island stakeholders' views of technology and technology education. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education.Google Scholar
  30. Simms, N. (1983). Oral and traditional literatures. Hamilton, N.Z.: Outrigger Publishers.Google Scholar
  31. Taufe'ulungaki, A. (1993). Educational provision and operation: Regional dimensions in the South Pacific. In K. Bacchus & C. Brock (Eds.), The challenge of scale: Educational development in the small island states of the Commonwealth. London: Commonwealth Secretariat.Google Scholar
  32. Taylor, N. (1991). An analysis of the Fiji Junior Certificate Basic Science examination and its implications for the teaching of science in Fiji. Journal of Science and Mathematics Education in South East Asia, 14(2), 73–78.Google Scholar
  33. Taylor, N. (1994). Improving environmental education in the Republic of Kiribati: Constraints and future prospects. Pacific-Asian Education Journal, 6(1), 4–10.Google Scholar
  34. Taylor, N. & Coll, R.K. (1999). Pre-service primary teachers self-efficacy in science teaching: The Fiji perspective. Pacific-Asian Education, 11(1), 31–44.Google Scholar
  35. Taylor, N. & Lucas, K. (1997). The trial of an innovative science program for pre-service primary teachers in Fiji. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 25(3), 325–343.Google Scholar
  36. Taylor, N. & Lucas, K. (2001). Some learning outcomes from a science program for preservice primary teachers undertaken in the context of a developing country. Evaluation and Research in Education, 15(4), 228–249.Google Scholar
  37. Taylor, N. & Topalian, T. (1995). Environmental education in the South Pacific: An evaluation of progress in three countries. The Environmentalist, 15(3), 159–169.Google Scholar
  38. UNESCO. (1986). Education in Asia and the Pacific-Retrospect: Prospect. Bangkok: UNESCO.Google Scholar
  39. UNESCO (1994). Report of the workshop on science education in Pacific schools. Apia, Samoa: UNESCO Office for the Pacific States.Google Scholar
  40. UNESCO (1995). Science education in Pacific Schools (SEPS): A sub-regional development project. Apia, Samoa: UNESCO Office for the Pacific States.Google Scholar
  41. UNESCO (1998). The status of primary science in the Tonga and Nuie. Apia, Samoa: UNESCO Office for the Pacific States.Google Scholar
  42. UNESCO (1999). The status of primary science in the South Pacific region. Apia, Samoa: UNESCO Office for the Pacific States.Google Scholar
  43. Vulliamy, G. (1988). Third world schools. In S. Briceno & D.C. Pit (Eds.), New ideas in environmental education (pp. 143–157). London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
  44. Walberg, H.J. (1991). Improving school science in advanced and developing countries. Review of Educational Research, 61(1), 25–69.Google Scholar
  45. White, R.T. (1988). Learning science. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Neil Taylor
    • 1
  • Barend Vlaardingerbroek
    • 2
  • Richard K. Coll
    • 3
  1. 1.School of EducationUniversity of New EnglandArmidale, NSWAustralia
  2. 2.RuatoriaNew Zealand
  3. 3.Centre for Science and Technology Education ResearchThe University of WaikatoHamiltonNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations