Innovative Higher Education

, Volume 28, Issue 4, pp 237–254 | Cite as

Clutch-Starting Stalled Research Students

  • Kathy Ahern
  • Catherine Manathunga
Article

Abstract

Many research students go through periods where their research seems to stall, their motivation drops, and they seem unable to make any progress. As supervisors, we attempt to remain alert to signs that our student's progress has stalled. Drawing on cognitive strategies, this article explores a problem-solving model supervisors can use to identify the major causes of the student's lack of progress and facilitate the student's re-ignition. Each of the problem identification and solving phases is acknowledged by and situated within research on postgraduate supervision and supported by analyzing transcripts from a study on postgraduate supervision.

academic procrastination research students supervisors graduate study 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Acker, S. (2001). The hidden curriculum in dissertation advising. In E. Margolis (Ed.), The hidden curriculum in higher education (pp. 61–77). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Ahern, K. (2000). “Something is wrong with my child”: A phenomenological account of a search for a diagnosis. Early Education and Development, 11, 124–138.Google Scholar
  3. Ahern, K., Dixon, C., Hauck, Y., Jackiewicz, S., & Jones, B. (1994). Aspects of confidence in research activity. Third National Conference of Women in Leadership, Perth, Western Australia. Perth: Edith Cowan University.Google Scholar
  4. Aspland, T., Edwards, H., O'Leary, J., & Ryan, Y. (1999). Tracking new directions in the evaluation of postgraduate supervision. Innovative Higher Education, 24, 127–147.Google Scholar
  5. Becher, T., Henkel, M., & Kogan, M. (1994). Graduate education in Britain. London: Jessica Kingsley.Google Scholar
  6. Beswick, G., Rothblum, E. D., & Mann, L. (1988). Psychological antecedents of student procrastination, Australian Psychologist, 23, 207–217.Google Scholar
  7. Black, A., & Deci, E. (2000). The effects of instructors' autonomy support and students' autonomous motivation in learning organic chemistry: A self-determination theory perspective. Science Education, 84, 740–756.Google Scholar
  8. Brew, A. (2001). Conceptions of research: A phenomenological study. Studies in Higher Education, 26, 271–285.Google Scholar
  9. Brockbank, A., & McGill, I. (1998). Facilitating reflective learning in higher education. Buckinghan, England: SRHE & Open University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Byrne, B. (1984). The general/academic self-concept normological network: A review of construct validation research. Review of Educational Research, 54, 427–456.Google Scholar
  11. Collins, A., Brown, J., & Newman, S. (1989). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the crafts of reading, writing and mathematics. In L. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning, and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser (pp. 453–494). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  12. Connell, R. (1985). How to supervise a Ph.D. Vestes, 28(2), 38–42.Google Scholar
  13. Conrad, L. (1994). Gender and postgraduate supervision. In O. Zuber-Skerrit & Y. Ryan (Eds.), Quality in postgraduate education (pp. 51–58). London: Kogan Page.Google Scholar
  14. Cryer, P. (1996). The research student's guide to success. Buckingham, England: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Deem, R., & Brehony, K. J. (2000). Doctoral students' access to research cultures—Are some more unequal than others? Studies in Higher Education, 25, 149–164.Google Scholar
  16. Elphinstone, L., & Schweitzer, R. (1998). How to get a research degree: Survival guide. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  17. Ferrari, J., & Beck, B. (1998). Affective responses before and after fraudulent excuses by academic procrastinators. Education Summer, 118(4), 529–538.Google Scholar
  18. Futoran, G., Hunt, J., & Rivera, J. (1995). The temporal impact of management faculty style and course characteristics: Some theoretical and developmental implications. Group and Organization Management, 20, 310–336.Google Scholar
  19. Gigliotti, R., & Gigliotti, C. (1998). Self concept of academic ability and the adult college student. Sociological Inquiry, 68, 295–322.Google Scholar
  20. Glatthorn, A. (1998). Writing the winning dissertation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  21. Green, B., & Lee, A. (1995). Theorising postgraduate pedagogy. Australian Universities Review, 2, 40–45.Google Scholar
  22. Greenberger, D., & Padesky, C. (1995). Mind over mood. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  23. Grossman, L., Gooden, S., Wavelet, M., Diaz, M., & Seupersad, R. (2002). Opening doors: Students' perspectives on juggling work, family and college. New York: Manpower Demonstration Research Corporation.Google Scholar
  24. Gurr, G. (2001). The supervisor student alignment tool kit. Retrieved February 21, 2003, from fIRST consortium Web site for improving research supervision and training: http://wallace.iim.uts.edu.au/staging/first/index.htmlGoogle Scholar
  25. Johnson, E. M., Green, K. E., & Kleuver, R. C. (2000). Psychometric characteristics of the revised procrastination inventory. Research in Higher Education, 41, 269–279.Google Scholar
  26. Kearns, H. (2002). Sabotage: How we do it and what you can do about it (abstract). In M. Kiley & G. Mullins (Eds.), Quality in postgraduate research: Integrating perspectives conference proceedings, Adelaide, April 8–19, 2002 (p. 175).Google Scholar
  27. Adelaide, Australia: Advisory Centre for University Education, The University of Adelaide.Google Scholar
  28. Latona, K., & Browne, M. (2001). Factors associated with completion of research higher degrees (Governmental report in ‘Higher Education Series’ 37). Canberra, Australia. Department of Education, Training and Youth Affairs, Higher Education Division.Google Scholar
  29. Lovitts, B. E. (2001). Leaving the ivory tower: The causes and consequences of departure from doctoral study. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  30. Manathunga, C. (2002). Detecting and dealing with early warning signs in postgraduate research education: A work-in-progress. In M. Kiley & G. Mullins (Eds.), Quality in postgraduate research: Integrating perspectives conference proceedings, Adelaide, April 18–19, (pp. 80–88). Adelaide, Australia: Advisory Centre for University Education, The University of Adelaide.Google Scholar
  31. McNab, B. (1993). Perceptions of phobia and phobics: The quest for control. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  32. McWilliam, E., Singh, P., & Taylor, P. (2002). Doctoral eduction, danger and risk management. Higher Education Research and Development, 21, 119–129.Google Scholar
  33. Minnaert, A. (1999). Motivational and emotion components affecting male's and female's self-regulated learning. European Journal Psychology of Education, 14, 525–540.Google Scholar
  34. Muszynski, S., & Akamatsu, T. (1991). Delay in completion of doctoral dissertations in clinical psychology. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 22, 119–123.Google Scholar
  35. Nightingale, P., & Sohler, C. (1994). Considering gender. Campbelltown, Australia: HERDSA.Google Scholar
  36. OECD. (1987). Postgraduate education in the 1980s. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.Google Scholar
  37. Onwuegbuzie, A., & Collins, K. (2001). Writing apprehension and academic procrastination among graduate students. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 92, 560.Google Scholar
  38. Parsloe, P. (1993). Supervising students for higher degrees by research in a social work department. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 17, 49–60.Google Scholar
  39. Pearson, M., & Brew, A. (2002). Research training and supervision development. Studies in Higher Education, 27(2), 135–150.Google Scholar
  40. Rothblum, E., Solomon, L., & Murakami, J. (1986). Affective, cognitive, and behavioral differences between high and low procrastinators. Journal of Counselling Psychology, 33, 387–394.Google Scholar
  41. Schapiro, S., & Livingston, J. (2000). Dynamic self-regulation: The driving force behind academic achievement. Innovative Higher Education, 25, 23–35.Google Scholar
  42. Schutz, P., Drogosz, L., White, V., & Di Stefano, C. (1998). Prior knowledge, attitude, and strategy use in an introduction to statistics course. Learning and Individual Differences, 10, 291–308.Google Scholar
  43. Senécal, C., Koestner, R., & Vallerand, R. (1995). Self-regulation and academic procrastination. Journal of Social Psychology, 135, 607–619.Google Scholar
  44. Smith, B. (2001). (Re)Framing research higher degree supervision as pedagogy. In A. Bartlett & G. Mercer (Eds.), Postgraduate research supervision: Transforming (R)Elations (pp. 25–41). New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  45. Solomon, L., & Rothblum, E. (1986). Stress, coping, and social support in women. Behavior Therapist, 9, 199–204.Google Scholar
  46. Style, I., & Radloff, A. (2000). Jabba the Hut: Research students' feelings about doing a thesis. In A. Hermann & M. M. Kulski (Eds.), Flexible futures in tertiary teaching. Proceedings of the 9th Annual Teaching Learning Forum, February 2–4, 2000. Perth, Australia: Curtin University of Technology.Google Scholar
  47. Yeatman, A. (1995). Making supervision relationship accountable: Graduate student logs. Australian Universities Review, 1995(2), 9–11.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press, Inc. 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kathy Ahern
    • 1
  • Catherine Manathunga
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Social ScienceThe University of QueenslandAustralia
  2. 2.Teaching and Educational Development Institute/The Graduate SchoolThe University of QueenslandAustralia

Personalised recommendations