Hydrobiologia

, Volume 517, Issue 1–3, pp 137–145 | Cite as

Space as a limiting resource in freshwater systems: competition between zebra mussels (Dreissena polymorpha) and freshwater sponges (Porifera)

  • Thomas E. Lauer
  • Anne Spacie

Abstract

Species interactions between two types of sessile benthic invertebrates, the zebra mussel (Dreissena polymorpha) and freshwater sponges (Porifera), were evaluated in Michigan City IN Harbor in southern Lake Michigan during 1996. The study objective was to define whether competition plays a role in structuring benthic communities using experimental techniques commonly employed in marine systems. Sponges were uninhibited by zebra mussel presence and overgrew zebra mussel shells on hard vertical substrata. In contrast, zebra mussels did not overgrow sponge colonies, but did show an ability to re-capture hard substrata if relinquished by the sponge. The negative affect of sponges on zebra mussels through overgrowth and recruitment suggests interactions that could eventually displace zebra mussels from these benthic communities. However, seasonal reduction of sponge biomass from autumn through winter appears to allow the zebra mussel a periodic respite from overgrowth, preventing exclusion of zebra mussels from the community and allowing these two taxa to co-exist.

benthos competition competitive exclusion dominance Lake Michigan 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bender, E. A., T. J. Case & M. E. Gilpin, 1984. Perturbation experiments in community ecology: theory and practice. Ecology 65: 1–13.Google Scholar
  2. Conley, W., 1976. Competition between Microtus: a behavioral hypothesis. Ecology 57: 224–237.Google Scholar
  3. Connell, J. H., 1961. The influence of interspecific competition and other factors on the distribution of the barnacle Chthamalus stellatus. Ecology 42: 710–723.Google Scholar
  4. Dayton, P. K., 1971. Competition, disturbance, and community organization: the provision and subsequent utilization of space in a rocky intertidal community. Ecological Monographs 41: 351–389.Google Scholar
  5. Dudley, T. L., C. M. D'Antonio & S. D. Cooper, 1990. Mechanisms and consequences of interspecific competition between two stream insects. Journal of Animal Ecology 59: 849–866.Google Scholar
  6. Early, T. A., J. T. Kundrat, T. Schorp & T. Glonek, 1996. Lake Michigan sponge phospholipid variations with habitat: a 31P nuclear magnetic resonance study. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology. 114: 77–89.Google Scholar
  7. Frost, T. M., 1991. Porifera. In Thorp, J. H. & A. P. Covich (eds), Ecology and Classification of North American Freshwater Invertebrates. Academic Press, Inc., New York: 95–124.Google Scholar
  8. Frost, T. M., G. S. de Nagy & J. J. Gilbert, 1982. Population dynamics and standing biomass of the freshwater sponge Spongilla lacustris. Ecology 63: 1203–1210.Google Scholar
  9. Gillis, P. L. & G. L. Mackie, 1994. Impact of the zebra mussel, Dreissena polymorpha, on populations of Unionidae (Bivalva) in Lake St. Clair. Canadian Journal of Zoology 72: 1260–1271.Google Scholar
  10. Haag, W. R., D. J. Berg & D. W. Garton, 1993. Reduced survival and fitness in native bivalves in response to fouling by the introduced zebra mussel (Dreissena polymorpha) in western Lake Erie. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science. 50: 13–19.Google Scholar
  11. Hardin, G., 1960. The competitive exclusion principle. Science 131: 1292–1297.Google Scholar
  12. Harrison, F. W., 1974. Sponges (Porifera: Spongillidae). In Hart, C. W. J. & S. L. H. Fuller (eds), Pollution Ecology of Freshwater Invertebrates. Academic Press, New York: 29–66.Google Scholar
  13. Hemphill, N., 1988. Competition between two stream dwelling filter-feeders, Hydropsyche oslari and Simulium virgatum. Oecologia 77: 73–80.Google Scholar
  14. Hunter, R. D., & J. F. Bailey, 1992. Dreissena polymorpha (zebra mussel): colonization of soft substrata and some effects on unionid bivalves. Nauticus 106: 60–67.Google Scholar
  15. Jackson, J. B. C. & L. Buss, 1975. Allelopathy and spatial competition among coral reef invertebrates. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 72: 5160–5163.Google Scholar
  16. Jaeger, R. G., 1974. Competitive exclusion: comments on survival and extinction of species. BioScience 24: 33–39.Google Scholar
  17. Kay, A. M. & M. J. Keough, 1981. Occupation of patches in the epifaunal communities on pier pilings and the bivalve Pinna bicolor Edithburgh, South Australia. Oecologia 48: 123–130.Google Scholar
  18. Keough, M. J. & B. J. Downes, 1982. Recruitment of marine invertebrates: the role of active larval choices and early mortality. Oecologia 54: 348–352.Google Scholar
  19. Lancaster, J., A. G. Hildrew & C. R. Townsend, 1988. Competition for space by predators in streams: field experiments on a netspinning caddisfly. Freshwater Biology 20: 185–193.Google Scholar
  20. Lauer, T. E., 1997. Space as a limiting resource among sessile benthic invertebrates: zebra mussels, freshwater sponges and bryozoans. Ph.D. Dissertation. Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, 158 pp.Google Scholar
  21. Lauer, T. E., D. K. Barnes, A. Ricciardi & A. Spacie, 1999. Evidence of recruitment inhibition of zebra mussels (Dreissena polymorpha) by a freshwater bryozoan (Lophopodella carteri). Journal of the North American Benthological Society 18: 406–413.Google Scholar
  22. Lauer, T. E. & T. S. McComish, 2001. Impact of zebra mussels (Dreissena polymorpha) on fingernail clams (Sphaeriidae) in extreme southern Lake Michigan. Journal of Great Lakes Research 27: 230–238.Google Scholar
  23. Lauer, T. E. & A. Spacie, 2000. The effects of sponge (Porifera) biofouling on zebra mussel (Dreissena polymorpha) fitness: Reduction of glycogen, tissue loss, and mortality. Journal of Freshwater Ecology 15: 83–92.Google Scholar
  24. Lauer, T. E., A. Spacie & D. K. Barnes, 2001. The distribution and habitat preferences of freshwater sponges (Porifera) in four southern Lake Michigan harbors. American Midland Naturalist 146: 243–253.Google Scholar
  25. Leach, J. H., 1993. Impacts of the zebra mussel (Dreissena polymorpha) on water quality and fish spawning reefs in western Lake Erie. In Nalepa, T. F. & D. W. Schloesser (eds), Zebra Mussels: Biology, Impacts, and Control. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FL: 381–397.Google Scholar
  26. Ludyanskiy, M. L., D. McDonald & D. MacNeill, 1993. Impact of the zebra mussel, a bivalve invader. BioScience 43: 533–544.Google Scholar
  27. Mackie, G. L., 1993. Biology of the zebra mussel (Dreissena polymorpha) and observations of mussel colonization on Unionid bivalves in Lake St. Clair of the Great Lakes. In Nalepa, T. F. & D. W. Schloesser (eds), Zebra Mussels: Biology, Impacts, and Control. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FL: 153–165.Google Scholar
  28. Marsden, J. E., 1992. Standard Protocols for Monitoring and Sampling Zebra Mussels. Illinois Natural History Survey Biological Notes 138, Champaign IL, 40 pp.Google Scholar
  29. Marsden, J. E., N. Trudeau & T. Keniry, 1993. Zebra Mussel Study on Lake Michigan. Illinois Natural History Survey, Aquatic Ecology Technical Report, 93/14, Champaign IL, 51 pp.Google Scholar
  30. Menge, B. A., 1976. Organization of the New England rocky intertidal community: role of predation, competition, and environmental heterogeneity. Ecological Monographs 46: 355–393.Google Scholar
  31. Menge, B. A., 1995. Indirect effects in marine rocky intertidal interaction webs: pattern and importance. Ecological Monographs 65: 21–74.Google Scholar
  32. Montgomery, D. C., 1991. Design and Analysis of Experiments, 3rd edn. John Wiley, New York, 649 pp.Google Scholar
  33. Nalepa, T. F., 1994. Decline of native unionid bivalves in Lake St. Clair after infestation by the zebra mussel, Driessena polymorpha. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science 51: 2227–2233.Google Scholar
  34. Nalepa, T. F. & D. W. Schloesser, 1993. Zebra Mussels: Biology, Impacts, and Control. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FL, 810 pp.Google Scholar
  35. Paine, R. T., 1984. Ecological determinism in the competition for space. Ecology 65: 1339–1348.Google Scholar
  36. Pennak, R.W., 1989. Fresh-water Invertebrates of the United States, 3rd edn. John Wiley, New York, 628 pp.Google Scholar
  37. Ricciardi, A. & H. M. Reiswig, 1993. Freshwater sponges (Porifera, Spongillidae) of eastern Canada: taxonomy, distribution, and ecology. Canadian Journal of Zoology 71: 665–682.Google Scholar
  38. Ricciardi, A., F. L. Snyder, D. O. Kelch & H. M. Reiswig, 1995. Lethal and sublethal effects of sponge overgrowth on introduced dreissenid mussels in the Great Lakes-St. Lawrence River system. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science 52: 2695–2703.Google Scholar
  39. Rutzler, K., 1970. Spatial competition among Porifera: solution by epizoism. Oecologia 5: 85–95.Google Scholar
  40. Sara, M., 1970. Competition and cooperation in sponge populations. In Fry, W. G. (ed.), Biology of the Porifera. Academic Press Inc., New York: 273–284.Google Scholar
  41. SAS Institute Inc., 1989a. SAS/STAT User's Guide, Version 6. 4th ed., Vol. 1. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC: 1–890.Google Scholar
  42. SAS Institute Inc., 1989b. SAS/STAT User's Guide, Version 6. 4th ed., Vol. 2. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC: 891–1685.Google Scholar
  43. Schloesser, D. W., T. F. Nalepa & G. Mackie, 1996. Zebra mussel infestation of unionid bivalves (Unionidae) in North America. American Zoologist 36: 300–310.Google Scholar
  44. Schoener, T. E., 1983. Field experiments on interspecific competition. American Naturalist 122: 240–285.Google Scholar
  45. Sebestyen, O., 1938. Colonization of two new fauna-elements of Pontus-origin (Dreissena polymorpha Pall. and Corophium curvispinum G.O. Sars forma devium Wundsch) in Lake Balaton. Verhandlungen der internationalen Vereinigung für theoretische und angewandte Limnologie 8: 169–182.Google Scholar
  46. Smit, H., A. Bij de Vaate, H. H. Reeders, E. H. van Nes & R. Noordhuis, 1993. Colonization, ecology, and positive aspects of zebra mussels (Dreissena polymorpha) in the Netherlands. In Nalepa, T. F. & D. W. Schloesser (eds) Zebra Mussels: Biology, Impacts, and Control. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FL: 55–77.Google Scholar
  47. Sprung, M., 1995. Physiological energetics of the zebra mussel Dreissena polymorpha in lakes I. Growth and reproductive effort. Hydrobiologia 304: 117–132.Google Scholar
  48. Sprung, M. & J. Borcherding, 1991. Physiological and morphometric changes in Dreissena polymorpha (Mollusca; Bivalvia) during a starvation period. Malacologia 33: 179–191.Google Scholar
  49. Stanczykowska, A., 1964. On the relationship between abundance, aggregations and 'condition' of Dreissena polymorpha Pall. in 36 Mazurian lakes. Ekologia Polska 12: 653–690.Google Scholar
  50. Stanczykowska, A., 1976. Ecosystem of the Mikolajskie Lake: regularities of the Dreissena polymorpha Pall. (Bivalvia) occurrence and its function in the lake. Polski Archiwum Hydrobiologii 22: 73–78.Google Scholar
  51. Stanczykowska, A., 1979. Size and weight of Dreissena polymorpha from European lakes. Hydrobiogical Journal 14: 20–23.Google Scholar
  52. Stanczykowska, A., & K. Lewandowski, 1980. Studies on the ecology of Dreissena polymorpha (Pall.) in some lakes. Lavori della Societa Malacologica Italiana 17–18: 369–374.Google Scholar
  53. Stewart, T. W. & J. M. Haynes, 1994. Benthic macroinvertebrate communities of southwestern Lake Ontario following invasion of Driessena. Journal of Great Lakes Research 20: 487–493.Google Scholar
  54. Toczylowski, S. A. & R. D. Hunter, 1997. Do zebra mussels preferentially settle on unionids and/or adult conspecifics? In D'Itri, F. R. (ed.), Zebra Mussels and Aquatic Nuisance Species. Ann Arbor Press, Chelsea, MI: 125–140.Google Scholar
  55. van den Brink, F. W. B., G. van der Velde & A. bij de Vaate, 1991. Amphipod invasion on the Rhine. Nature 352: 576.Google Scholar
  56. van der Velde, G., B. G. P. Paffen, F. W. B. van den Brink, A. bij de Vaate & H. A. Jenner, 1994. Decline of zebra mussel populations in the Rhine: competition between two mass invaders (Dreissena polymorpha and Corophium curvispinum). Naturwissenschaften 81: 32–34.Google Scholar
  57. Wahl, M., 1989 Marine epibiosis. I. Fouling and antifouling: some basic aspects. Marine Ecology Progress Series 58: 175–189.Google Scholar
  58. Wiens, J. A., 1977. On competition and variable environments. American Scientist 65: 590–597.Google Scholar
  59. Williamson, M., 1996. Biological Invasions. Chapman and Hall, New York, 244 pp.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Thomas E. Lauer
    • 1
  • Anne Spacie
    • 2
  1. 1.Aquatic Biology and Fisheries Center, Department of BiologyBall State UniversityMuncieU.S.A
  2. 2.Department of Forestry and Natural ResourcesPurdue UniversityWest LafayetteU.S.A

Personalised recommendations