Human Studies

, Volume 27, Issue 3, pp 221–239 | Cite as

Husserl and the Penetrability of the Transcendental and Mundane Spheres

  • Robert Arp


There is a two-fold problem the phenomenologist must face: the first has to do with thinking like a phenomenologist given that one is always already steeped in the mundane sphere; the second has to do with the phenomenologist entering into dialogue with those scientists, psychologists, sociologists and other laypersons who still remain in the mundane sphere. I address the first problem by giving an Husserlian-inspired account of the movement from the mundane to the transcendental, and show that there are decent prospects for getting life-world folks to start thinking like phenomenologists. I address the second problem by showing that Husserl has himself caught in a dilemma: either the reduction takes place and no communication is possible between phenomenologist and non-phenomenologist, or the reduction does not take place and the phenomenological method remains a psychological makeshift, supposedly accessible to Husserl and his esoteric followers.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Barnes, J. (1987). Early Greek Philosophy. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  2. Buckley, R.P. (1992). Husserl, Heidegger and the Crisis of Philosophical Responsibility. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  3. Cairns, D. (1976). In R.M. Zaner (Ed.), Conversations with Husserl and Fink. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  4. Carr, D. (1977). Kant, Husserl, and the nonempirical ego. The Journal of Philosophy 74 (11): 682–690.Google Scholar
  5. Carr, D. (1999). The Paradox of Subjectivity: The Self in the Transcendental Tradition. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Crowell, S.G. (2001). Husserl, Heidegger, and the Space of Meaning: Paths Toward Transcen-dental Phenomenology. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Farber, M. (1962). The Foundation of Phenomenology: Edmund Husserl and the Quest for a Rigorous Science of Philosophy. New York: Paine-Whitman Publishers.Google Scholar
  8. Fink, E. (1970). The Phenomenological Philosophy of Edmund Husserl and Contemporary Criticism. In R.O. Elveton (Ed. and Trans.), The Phenomenology of Husserl: Selected Critical Readings. Chicago: Quadrangle Press, pp. 90–147.Google Scholar
  9. Fink, E. (1972). What Does the Phenomenology of Edmund Husserl Want to Accomplish? (The Phenomenological Idea of Laying-a-Ground). In A. Grugan (Trans.), Research in Phenomenology, Vol. II, New York: Humanities Press, pp. 13–39.Google Scholar
  10. Fink, E. (1995). In R. Bruzina (Ed. and trans.), Sixth Cartesian Meditation: The Idea of a Transcendental Theory of Method. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Frege, G. (1905). Review of E. Husserl's philosophy of arithmetic. Mind 81(14): 324–325.Google Scholar
  12. Frege, G. (1960). The Foundations of Arithmetic. In J.L. Austin (Trans.). New York: Harper.Google Scholar
  13. Hagan, S. and Hirafuji, M. (2001). Constraints on an emergent formulation of conscious. Mental states. Journal of Consciousness Studies 8(9/10): 99–122.Google Scholar
  14. Heidegger, M. (1962). Being and Time. In J. Macquarrie and E. Robinson (Trans.). New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  15. Heidegger, M. (1966). Discourse on Thinking. J.M. Anderson and H.E. Freund (Trans.). New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  16. Heidegger, M. (1971). Plato's Doctrine of Truth, J. Barlow. In W. Barrett and H.D. Aiken (Eds. and Trans.), Philosophy in the Twentieth Century, Vol. III: Contemporary European Thought, pp. 67–91. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  17. Hopkins, B.C. (1991). On the paradoxical inception and motivation of transcendental philosophy in Plato and Husserl. Man and World 24: 27–47.Google Scholar
  18. Husserl, E. (1970). The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology: An Introduction to Phenomenological Philosophy. In D. Carr (Trans.). Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Husserl, E. (1995). Cartesian Meditations: An Introduction to Phenomenology. In D. Cairns (Trans.). London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  20. Irwin, T. (1989). Classical Thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Kant, I. (1929). The Critique of Pure Reason. In N. Kemp-Smith (Trans.). NewYork: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  22. Keller, P. (1999). Husserl and Heidegger on Human Experience. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  23. King, J. (1982). Ontology and subjectivity in Husserl and Schutz. International Studies in Philosophy 14: 33–56.Google Scholar
  24. Kockelmans, J.J. (1994). Edmund Husserl's Phenomenology. West Lafayette: Purdue University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Kreis, F. (1930). Phänomenologie und Kritizismus. In (Ed.), Heidelberger Abhandlungen zur Philosophie und ihrer Geschichte, pp. 119–145. Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr.Google Scholar
  26. MacDonald, P.S. (2000). Descartes and Husserl: The Philosophical Project of Radical Beginnings. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  27. Mayr, E. (1996). The autonomy of biology: The position of biology among the sciences. Quarterly Review of Biology 71: 98–106.Google Scholar
  28. McGaughey, D.R. (1976). Husserl and Heidegger on Plato's cave allegory: A study of philosophical influence. International Philosophical Quarterly 16(3): 335–349.Google Scholar
  29. Mohanty, J.N. (1996). Kant and Husserl. Husserl Studies 13(1): 19–30.Google Scholar
  30. Moran, D. (2000). Introduction to Phenomenology. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  31. Mouillie, J. (1997). Le Fait De Vivre Dans la Phenomenology: Elements Critiques a Partir de Husserl. In A. Tymieniecka (Ed.), Life: Phenomenology of Life as the Starting Point of Philosophy. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 89–100.Google Scholar
  32. Natanson, M. (1973a). Introduction. In M. Natason (Ed.), Phenomenology and the Social Sciences: Vol. 1. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Natanson, M. (1973b). Edmund Husserl: Philosopher of Infinite Tasks. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Nietzsche, F. (1980). On the Advantage and Disadvantage of History for Life. In P. Preuss (Trans.) Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.Google Scholar
  35. Overgaard, S. (2002). Epoche and solipsistic reduction. Husserl Studies 18(3): 209–222.Google Scholar
  36. Robinson, H. (2000). Kant on Apriority, Syntheticity, and Judgments. In O.K. Wiegand et al. (Eds.), Phenomenology on Kant, German Idealism, Hermeneutics and Logic: Philosophical Essays in Honor of Thomas M. Seebohm. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 225–248.Google Scholar
  37. Rollinger, R.D. (1999). Husserl's Position in the School of Brentano. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  38. Scheler, M. (1960). On The Eternal in Man. In B. Noble (Trans.). New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  39. Scheler, M. (1970). The Nature of Sympathy. In P.Heath (Trans.). Hamden: Archon Books.Google Scholar
  40. Schutz, A. (1962a). The Paradox of the Transcendental Ego. In H. Wagner and G. Psathas (Eds.), Collected Papers IV. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  41. Schutz, A. (1962b). Symbol, Reality and Society. In M. Natanson (Ed.), Collected Papers I: The Problem of Social Reality. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  42. Silberstein, M. (2001). Converging on emergence: Consciousness, causation and explanation. Journal of Consciousness Studies 8(9/10): 61–98.Google Scholar
  43. Solomon, R. and Higgins K. (1993). The Age of German Idealism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  44. Stewart, D. and Mickunas, A. (1974). Exploring Phenomenology: A Guide to the Field and Its Literature. Chicago: American Library Association.Google Scholar
  45. Ströker, E. (1987). The Husserlian Foundations of Science. Washington, DC: Center for Advanced Research in Phenomenology & University Press of America.Google Scholar
  46. Wagner, H. and Psathas, G. (1962). Notes. In H. Wagner and G. Psathas (Eds.), Alfred Schutz: Collected Papers, Volume IV. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  47. Welton, D. (1999). Introduction: The Development of Husserl's Phenomenology. In D. Welton (Ed.), The Essential Husserl: Basic Writings in Transcendental Phenomenology. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, pp. 3–279.Google Scholar
  48. Zaner, R.M. (1970a). The Way of Phenomenology: Criticism as a Philosophical Discipline. New York: Pegasus Books.Google Scholar
  49. Zaner, R.M. (1970b). The Phenomenology of Epistemic Claims and Its Bearing on the Essence of Philosophy. In M. Natanson (Ed.), Phenomenology and Social Reality: Essays in Memory of Alfred Schutz. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, pp. 17–34.Google Scholar
  50. Zaner, R.M. (1975). On the Sense of Method in Phenomenology. In E. Pivčevic (Ed.), Phenomenology and Philosophical Understanding. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  51. Zocher, R. (1932). Husserls Phänomenologie und Scuppes Logik: Ein Beitrag zur Kritik des intuitionistischen Ontologismus in der Immanenzidee. Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert Arp
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PhilosophySaint Louis UniversitySt.LouisU.S.A

Personalised recommendations