Human Studies

, Volume 26, Issue 4, pp 431–448 | Cite as

Ethnomethodology as Radical Sociology: An Expansive Appreciation of Melvin Pollner's 'Constitutive and Mundane Versions of Labeling Theory'

  • T.J. Berard
Article

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Atkinson, J.M. 1978. Discovering Suicide: Studies in the Social Organization of Sudden Death. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
  2. Becker, H.S. 1963. Outsiders: Studies in the Sociology of Deviance [published with a new chapter, Labelling Theory Reconsidered, © 1973]. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  3. Berard, T.J. 2002. Moving Forward by Looking Back: Revisiting Melvin Pollner's “Constitutive and Mundane Versions of Labeling Theory.” Human Studies 25(4): 495-498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bernstein, R.J. 1985. Science, Rationality, and Incommensurability. In: Beyond Objectivism and Relativism: Science, Hermeneutics, and Praxis, pp. 51-108. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
  5. Blum, A.F. 1970. The Corpus of Knowledge as a Normative Order: Intellectual Critiques of the Social Order of Knowledge and the Commonsense Features of Bodies of Knowledge. In: J. McKinney and E. Tiryakian (Eds.), Theoretical Sociology: Perspectives and Developments, pp. 319-336. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
  6. Blumer, H. 1969. Sociological Analysis and the “Variable.” In: Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method, pp. 127-139. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  7. Coulter, J. 1973. Approaches to Insanity: A Philosophical and Sociological Study. London: Martin Robertson.Google Scholar
  8. Coulter, J. 1991. The Grammar of Schizophrenia. In: W.F. Flack, D. Miller, and M. Wiener (Eds.), What is Schizophrenia?, pp. 161-171. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  9. Coulter, J. 1996. Chance, cause and conduct: probability theory and the explanation of human action. In: S.G. Shanker (Ed.), Philosophy of Science, Logic and Mathematics in the 20 th Century, Vol. IX of the Routledge History of Philosophy, ch. 8.Google Scholar
  10. Erikson, K.T. 1962. Notes on the Sociology of Deviance. Social Problems 9: 307-314.Google Scholar
  11. Garfinkel, H. 1967. Studies in Ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  12. Garfinkel, H. 2002. In: A.W. Rawls (Ed.), Ethnomethodology's Program: Working Out Durkheim's Aphorism. New York: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
  13. Garfinkel, H. and Wieder, D.L. 1992. Two Incommensurable, Asymetrically Alternate Technologies of Social Analysis. In: G. Watson and R. Seiler (Eds.), Text in Context: Contributions to Ethnomethodology, pp. 175-206. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  14. Gill, V.T. and Maynard, D.W. 1995. On “Labeling” in Actual Interaction: Delivering and Receiving Diagnoses of Developmental Disabilities. Social Problems 42(1): 11-37.Google Scholar
  15. Goode, E. 1975. On Behalf of Labeling Theory. Social Problems 22(5): 570-583.Google Scholar
  16. Kitsuse, J.I. 1962. Societal Reaction to Deviant Behavior: Problems of Theory and Method. Social Problems 9(3): 247-256.Google Scholar
  17. Kuhn, T.S. 1970. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 2nd edition, enlarged. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  18. Lakatos, I. and Musgrave, A. (Eds.). 1970. Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Lemert, E.M. 1951. Social Pathology. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  20. Plummer, K. 1996. Labelling Theory. In: A. Kuper and J. Kuper (Eds.), The Social Science Encyclopedia, 2nd edition, pp. 444-445. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  21. Pollner, M. 1974. Sociological and Common-Sense Models of the Labelling Process. In: R. Turner (Ed.), Ethnomethodology, pp. 27-40. Baltimore: Penguin.Google Scholar
  22. Pollner, M. 1978. Constitutive and Mundane Versions of Labeling Theory. Human Studies 1: 269-288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Pollner, M. 1987. Mundane Reason: Reality in Everyday and Sociological Discourse. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Potter, J. 1996. Representing Reality: Discourse, Rhetoric and Social Construction. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  25. Sacks, H. 1963. Sociological Description. Berkeley Journal of Sociology 8(1): 1-16.Google Scholar
  26. Tannenbaum, F. 1938. Crime and the Community. New York: Ginn and Co.Google Scholar
  27. Zimmerman, D. and Pollner, M. 1970. The Everyday World as a Phenomenon. In: J.D. Douglas (Ed.), Understanding Everyday Life: Toward the Reconstruction of Sociological Knowledge, pp. 80-103. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • T.J. Berard
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Justice StudiesKent State UniversityKentUSA

Personalised recommendations