Higher Education

, Volume 47, Issue 1, pp 1–20 | Cite as

Pathways to completion: Patterns of progression through a university degree

  • Rosalie Robinson
Article

Abstract

This paper outlines a technique for identifyingand representing pathways of studentprogression through a degree course. Considerable attention over the last decade indeveloping performance indicators of studentprogress, retention and completion in highereducation, has neglected indicators ofindividual student progression. Common studentoutcome performance indicators are based oncohort or census-like counts. A new techniqueis proposed for longitudinal analysis ofindividual student enrolment and unit of studycompletions, to create pathways at the studentlevel. The frequency of individual pathwaysindicate the common patterns of studentprogression at the course level. Pathwaypatterns convey important information aboutchanges in programs of study, and associationswith student characteristics. Pathway patternscomplement current student outcome performanceindicators. The pathway technique is simple,accurate, practical and applicable not only tostaff and students in making informed decisionsregarding the teaching and learning environmentbut also to universities and governments inplanning and policy development.

completion dropout longitudinal performance indicators progression retention student attrition student flow transfer university 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allen, D. (1999). ‘Desire to finish college: An empirical link between motivation and persistence’, Research in Higher Education 40(4), 461–485.Google Scholar
  2. Altbach, P.G. (1996). The International Academic Profession. Portraits of Fourteen Countries. Princeton: The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.Google Scholar
  3. Andrews, L., Aungles, P., Baker, S. and Sarris, A. (1997). Characteristics and Performance of Higher Education Institutions: A Preliminary Investigation (Occasional Papers Series). Canberra: Department of Employment, Education, Training and Youth Affairs, Higher Education Division.Google Scholar
  4. Bach, S.K., Banks,M.T., Kinnick,M.K., Ricks, M.F., Stoering, J.M. and Walleri, R.D. (2000). ‘Student attendance patterns and performance in an urban postsecondary environment’, Research in Higher Education 41(3), 315–330.Google Scholar
  5. Bean, J.P. (1980). ‘Dropouts and turnover: The synthesis and test of a causal model of student attrition’, Research in Higher Education 12, 155–187.Google Scholar
  6. Bean, J.P. (1985). ‘Interaction effects based on class level in an explanatory model of college student dropout syndrome’, American Educational Research Journal 22(1), 35–64.Google Scholar
  7. Cabrera, A., Nora, A. and Castaneda, M.B. (1993). ‘College persistence: Structural equations modelling test of an integrated model of student retention’, Journal of Higher Education 64(2), 125–139.Google Scholar
  8. Cave, M., Hanney, S., Kogan, M. and Trevett, G. (1991). The Use of Performance Indicators in Higher Education. London: Jessica Kingsley.Google Scholar
  9. Clarke, J.R. (1997). What Should Drive Educational Equity and Student Diversity in Australian Higher Education? Social Responsibility versus Reporting Obligation. Paper presented at the AIR 37th Annual Forum, Florida, May 17-22.Google Scholar
  10. Cobbin, D., Barlow, A. and Dennis, J. (1992). ‘A longitudinal study of the academic performance of Aboriginal students at the University of Western Sydney Nepean: 1985-1991’, in Cobbin, D. and Barlow, A.R. (eds.), Tertiary Access and Equity Initiatives: A Handbook for Evaluative Research. Sydney: AGPS, pp. 87–97.Google Scholar
  11. Cobbin, D.M. and Barlow, A.R. (1993). Progression of TAFE Transfer Students in Undergraduate Programs at UWS Nepean: Demographic and Performance Characteristics. Canberra: DEET.Google Scholar
  12. Department of Education Employment Training and Youth Affairs (1998). Performance indicators and the Course Performance Report at Queensland University of Technology (No. 28). Canberra: DEETYA.Google Scholar
  13. Department of Education Training and Youth Affairs (1998). The Characteristics and Performance of Higher Education Institutions (98-A). Canberra: DETYA.Google Scholar
  14. Department of Education Training and Youth Affairs (1999). Equity in Higher Education (99-A). Canberra: DETYA.Google Scholar
  15. Department of Employment Education and Training (1996). Diversity in Australian Higher Education Institutions, 1994 (No. 26). Canberra: DEET.Google Scholar
  16. Dickson, J., Fleet, A. and Watt, H.M.G. (2000). ‘Success or failure in a core university unit: What makes the difference?’, Higher Education Research and Development 19(1), 59–73.Google Scholar
  17. Dobson, I. and Sharma, R. (1993). ‘Student progress: A study of the experience in Victorian tertiary institutions’, Journal of Tertiary Education Administration 15(2), 203–211.Google Scholar
  18. Dobson, I., Sharma, R. and Haydon, A. (1996). ACTA Evaluation of the Relative Performance of Commencing Undergraduate Students in Australian Universities. Canberra: Australian Credit Transfer Agency.Google Scholar
  19. Dobson, I., Sharma, R. and Haydon, A. (1997). Commencing Undergraduates in Australian Universities: Enrolment and Performance Trends 1993-1995. Survey of Applicants for Undergraduate Higher Education Courses (ACN 008 502 930). Canberra: Australian Vice-Chancellors' Committee.Google Scholar
  20. Gallagher, M. and Conn, W. (1994). Diversity and Performance of Australian Universities (No. 22). Canberra: DEET.Google Scholar
  21. Higher Education Funding Council for England (1999). Performance Indicators in Higher Education: First Report of the Performance Indicators Steering Group (PISG) (99/11). HEFCE.Google Scholar
  22. Holder, G.M., Jones, J., Robinson, R.A. and Krass, I. (1999). ‘Academic literacy skills and progression rates amongst pharmacy students’, Higher Education Research and Development 18(1), 19–30.Google Scholar
  23. Jones, J., Krass, I., Holder, G.M. and Robinson, R.A. (2000). ‘Selecting pharmacy students with appropriate communication skills’, American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education 64, 68–73.Google Scholar
  24. Kearney, G., Townsend, B. and Kearney, T. (1995). ‘Multiple-transfer students in a public urban university: Background characteristics and interinstitutional movements’, Research in Higher Education 36(3), 323–344.Google Scholar
  25. Lewis, D.E. (1994). The Performance at University of Equity Groups and Students Admitted via Alternative Modes of Entry (No. 246). Canberra: DEET.Google Scholar
  26. Linke, R.D. (1991a). Performance Indicators in Higher Education: Report of a Trial Evaluation Study Commissioned by the Commonwealth Department of Employment Education and Training (Vol. 1, Report and Recommendations). Canberra: AGPS.Google Scholar
  27. Linke, R.D. (1991b). Performance Indicators in Higher Education: Report of a Trial Evaluation Study Commissioned by the Commonwealth Department of Employment Education and Training (Vol. 2, Supplementary Papers). Canberra: AGPS.Google Scholar
  28. McClelland, A.A. and Kruger, P.W. (1993). An Investigation of the Subsequent Performance in Tertiary Studies of Students Admitted Through the Queensland Tertiary Admissions Centre in 1989-1990. Canberra: DEET.Google Scholar
  29. McGivney, V. (1996). Staying or Leaving the Course: Non-Completion and Retention of Mature Students in Further and Higher Education. Leicester: NIACE.Google Scholar
  30. McKinnon, K.R., Walker, S.H. and Davis, D. (2000). Benchmarking: A Manual for Australian Universities (No. 6441). Canberra: DETYA.Google Scholar
  31. Murtaugh, P.A., Burns, L.D. and Schuster, J. (1999). ‘Predicting the retention of university students’, Research in Higher Education 40(3), 355–371.Google Scholar
  32. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (1998). Education at a Glance OECD Indicators: Key Comparisons and Trends. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  33. Ozga, J. and Sukhnandan, L. (1998). ‘Undergraduate non-completion: Developing an explanatory model’, Higher Education Quarterly 52(3), 316–333.Google Scholar
  34. Pascarella, E.T. and Chapman, D.W. (1983). ‘A multi-institutional, path analytic validation of Tinto's model of college withdrawal’, American Educational Research Journal 20(1), 87–102.Google Scholar
  35. Pascarella, E.T. and Terenzini, P.T. (1980). ‘Predicting freshman persistence and voluntary dropout decisions from a theoretical model’, Journal of Higher Education 51, 60–75.Google Scholar
  36. Pascarella, E.T. and Terenzini, P.T. (1991). How College Affects Students: Findings and Insights from Twenty Years of Research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  37. Price, D., Harte, J., and Cole, M. (1992). Student Progression in Higher Education: A Study of Attrition at Northern Territory University (92/181). Canberra: DETYA.Google Scholar
  38. Ramsey, E., Tranter, D., Sumner, R. and Barrett, S. (1996). Outcomes of a University's Flexible Admissions Policies (96/8). Canberra: DETYA.Google Scholar
  39. Shah, C. and Burke, G. (1999). ‘An undergraduate student flow model: Australian higher education’, Higher Education 37, 359–375.Google Scholar
  40. Sharma, R. and Burgess, Z. (1994). ‘Student discontinuation at a technological higher education institution’, Journal of Tertiary Education Administration 16(2), 225–238.Google Scholar
  41. Tinto, V. (1975). ‘Dropout from higher education: A theoretical synthesis of recent research’, Review of Educational Research 45(1), 89–125.Google Scholar
  42. Tinto, V. (1988). ‘Stages of student departure: Reflections on the longitudinal character of student leaving’, Journal of Higher Education 59(4), 438–455.Google Scholar
  43. Tinto, V. (1993). Leaving College: Rethinking the Causes and Cures of Student Attrition (2nd edn.). Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  44. Urban, M., Jones, E., Smith, G., Evans, C., Maclachlan, M. and Karmel, T. (1999). Completions: Undergraduate Academic Outcomes for 1992 Commencing Students (99-G). Canberra: DETYA.Google Scholar
  45. West, L.H.T. (1985). ‘Differential predication of first-year university performance for students from different social backgrounds’, Australian Journal of Education 29, 175–187.Google Scholar
  46. Yorke, M. (1998). ‘Performance indicators relating to student development: Can they be trusted?’, Quality in Higher Education 4(1), 45–61.Google Scholar
  47. Yorke, M., Bell, R., Dove, A., Haslam, L., Hughes Jones, H., Longden, B., O'Connell, C., Typuszak, R. and Ward, J. (1997). Undergraduate Non-completion in Higher Education in England (No.1). Bristol: HEFCE.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rosalie Robinson
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Education/A35University of SydneyAustralia (E-mail

Personalised recommendations