Health Care Analysis

, Volume 11, Issue 3, pp 259–267 | Cite as

The Meaning of Quality in Health Care: A Conceptual Analysis

  • P. P. M. Harteloh


During the past three decades, there has been an ongoing debate on the quality of health care. Defining quality is an important part of it. This paper offers a review of definitions and a conceptual analysis in order to understand and explain the differences between them. The analysis results in a semantic rule, expressing the meaning of quality as an optimal balance between possibilities realised and a framework of norms and values. This rule is postulated as a formal criterion of meaning, e.g. when (correctly) applied people understand each other. The rule suits the abstract nature of the term “quality.” Quality doesn't exist as such. It is constructed in an interaction between people. This interaction is guided by rules in order to transfer information, e.g. communicate on quality. The rule improves our ability to discuss the debate on quality and to develop a theory grounding actions such as quality assurance or quality improvement.

quality of health care conceptual analysis definitions of quality theory of meaning philosophy health policy 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Abelson, A. (1972) Definition. In P. Edwards (Ed.), The Encyclopedia of Philosophy. New York: Macmillan and the Free Press.Google Scholar
  2. Berkestein van, Th.M.G. and Colsen, P.J.A. (1989) Kwaliteit van zorg. Medisch Contact 44, 423–426 (in Dutch).Google Scholar
  3. Blumenthal, D. (1996a) Quality of Care—What is it? New England Journal of Medicine 335, 891–893.Google Scholar
  4. Blumenthal, D. (1996b) The Origins of the Quality-of-Care Debate. New England Journal of Medicine 335, 1146–1149.Google Scholar
  5. Campbell, S.M. and Buetow, R.S.A. (2000) Defining Quality of Care. Social Science and Medicine 51, 1611–1625.Google Scholar
  6. Caper, Ph. (1974) The Meaning of Quality in Medical Care. New England Journal of Medicine 29, 1136–1137.Google Scholar
  7. Caper, Ph. (1988) Defining Quality in Medical Care. Health Affairs Spring, 49–60.Google Scholar
  8. Casparie, A.F. (1989) Kwaliteit in de gezondheidszorg: huidige inzichten en toekomstige ontwikkelingen. Medisch Contact 44, 477-482 (in Dutch).Google Scholar
  9. Committee on Quality in Health Care in America (2001) Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21th Century. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  10. Crosby, P.B. (1979) Quality Is Free. New York: New American Library.Google Scholar
  11. Davidson, D. (1984) Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press. Essays 1, 2, and 4.Google Scholar
  12. Donabedian, A. (1980) Explorations in Quality Assessment and Monitoring. Vol. 1: The Definition of Quality and Approaches to its Assessment. Ann Arbor, MI: Health Administration Press.Google Scholar
  13. Feigenbaum, A.V. (1983) Total Quality Control. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  14. Gudmundsson, G.H. and Maack, P.K. (1991) In Search of a Theory of Quality. In Proceedings of the 35th Annual Conference of the European Orginization for Quality (EOQ). Prague: EOQ.Google Scholar
  15. Harteloh, P.P.M. and Verheggen, F.W.S.M. (1994) Quality Assurance in Health Care. From a Traditional Towards a Modern Approach. Health Policy 27, 261–270.Google Scholar
  16. Harteloh, P.P.M. (2000) The Meaning of Quality in Health Care: From Intuition to Rational Reconstruction (Dissertation). Rotterdam: Erasmus University Rotterdam (EUR).Google Scholar
  17. Harvey, G. (1996) Quality in Health Care: Traditions, Influences and Future Directions. International Journal for Quality in Health Care 8, 341–350.Google Scholar
  18. ISO (International Organisation for Standardisation) (1994) Quality Management and Quality Assurance. Vocabulary (ISO 8402: 1994). Geneva: ISO.Google Scholar
  19. Juran, J.M. (1974) Quality Control Handbook. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  20. Kasdorp, J.P., Pannenborg, Ch.O. and Wijnberg, B. (1982) Kwaliteitsmeting in de gezondheidszorg. Een signaal van de Harmonisatieraad Welzijnsbeleid. Medisch Contact 37, 1023-1025 (in Dutch).Google Scholar
  21. Laffel, G. and Blumenthal, D. (1989) The Case for Using Industrial Quality Management Science in Health Care Organizations. JAMA 262, 2869–2873.Google Scholar
  22. Lohr, K.N., K.D. and Yordy, S.O. (1988) The Current Issues in Quality of Care. Health Affairs Spring: 5–18.Google Scholar
  23. Lohr, K.H. and Harris-Wehling, J.H. (1991) Medicare: A Strategy for Quality Assurance, I: A Recapitulation of the Study and a Definition of Quality of Care. Quality Review Bulletin 17, 6–9.Google Scholar
  24. Morehead, M.A. (1967) The Medical Audit as an Operational Tool. American Journal of Public Health 57, 1643–1656.Google Scholar
  25. Munchow, O.B. (1986) The Term “Quality.” Quality Review Bulletin 12, 310.Google Scholar
  26. NRV., Nationale Raad voor de Volksgezondheid (1990) Discussienota Algemeen Begrippenkader Kwaliteitsbevordering. Zoetermeer: NRV, publikatie 13/90 (in Dutch).Google Scholar
  27. Reerink, E. (1983) De kwaliteit van het medisch handelen in het ziekenhuis. Medisch Contact 38, 346-348 (in Dutch).Google Scholar
  28. Simons, A.J. and van Mansvelt, J. (1976) Intercollegiale Toetsing in Algemene Ziekenhuizen (rapport). Utrecht: Centraal Begeleidingsorgaan voor de Intercolegiale Toetsing (CBO) (in Dutch).Google Scholar
  29. Steffen, G.E. (1988) Quality Medical Care: A Definition. JAMA 260, 56–61.Google Scholar
  30. Vuori, H. (1980) Optimal and Logical Quality: Two Neglected Aspects of the Quality of Health Services. Medical Care 13, 975–985.Google Scholar
  31. Wittgenstein, L. (1958) Philosophical Investigations. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. P. M. Harteloh
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Health Policy and Management. P. P. M. HartelohErasmus MC/Erasmus University RotterdamRotterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations