Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Detecting Deception: The Benefit of Looking at a Combination of Behavioral, Auditory and Speech Content Related Cues in a Systematic Manner

  • Published:
Group Decision and Negotiation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

People communicate with each other across distance in a variety of ways, for example, via the telephone, via electronic forms of communication (the written word) or via videolinks. In this article, behavioral, auditory and speech content related cues which research has shown discriminate (to some extent) between liars and truth tellers will be discussed. Although research has indicated that people are generally poor at detecting deceit, some recent studies suggest that looking at nonverbal, auditory and speech content related responses in an objective and systematic manner will lead to more accurate classifications of liars and truth tellers. These studies will be discussed. Apart from examining the available cues objectively and systematically, lie detection might further improve if the lie detector employs certain communication techniques. In the final part of this article we will discuss some of these techniques.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akehurst, L. and A. Vrij. (1999). “Creating Suspects in Police Interviews,” Journal of Applied Social Psychology 29, 192–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Akehurst, L., G. Köhnken, A. Vrij, and R. Bull. (1996). “Lay Persons' and Police Officers' Beliefs Regarding Deceptive Behaviour,” Applied Cognitive Psychology 10, 461–471.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alonso-Quecuty, M. L. (1992). “Deception Detection and Reality Monitoring: A New Answer to an Old Question?” in F. Lösel, D. Bender, and T. Bliesener (eds.), Psychology and Law: International Perspectives. Berlin, Germany: Walter de Gruyter, 328–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alonso-Quecuty, M. L. (1996). “Detecting Fact from Fallacy in Child and Adult Witness Accounts,” in G. Davies, S. Lloyd-Bostock, M. McMurran, and C. Wilson (eds.), Psychology, Law, and Criminal Justice: International Developments in Research and Practice. Berlin, Germany: Walter de Gruyter, 74–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alonso-Quecuty, M. L., E. Hernandez-Fernaud, and L. Campos. (1997). “Child Witnesses: Lying About Something Heard,” in S. Redondo, V. Garrido, J. Perez, and R. Barbaret (eds.), Advances in Psychology and Law. Berlin, Germany: Walter de Gruyter, 129–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baskett, G. D. and R. O. Freedle. (1974). “Aspects of Language Pragmatics and the Social Perception of Lying,” Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 3, 117–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bond, C. F. and W. E. Fahey. (1987). “False Suspicion and the Misperception of Deceit,” British Journal of Social Psychology 26, 41–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bond, C. F., A. Omar, U. Pitre, B. R. Lashley, L. M. Skaggs, and C. T. Kirk. (1992). “Fishy-Looking Liars: Deception Judgment from Expectancy Violation,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 63, 969–977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandt, D. R., G. R. Miller, and J. E. Hocking. (1980a). “The Truth-Deception Attribution: Effects of Familiarity on the Ability of Observers to Detect Deception,” Human Communication Research 6, 99–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandt, D. R., G. R. Miller, and J. E. Hocking. (1980b). “Effects of Self-Monitoring and Familiarity on Deception Detection,” Communication Quarterly 28, 3–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bull, R. (1998). “Obtaining Information From Child Witnesses,” in A. Memon, A. Vrij, and R. Bull (eds.), Psychology and Law: Truthfulness, Accuracy and Credibility. Maidenhead, England: McGraw-Hill, 188–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buller, D. B. and J. K. Burgoon. (1996). “Interpersonal Deception Theory,” Communication Theory 6, 203–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buller, D. B., J. B. Stiff, and J. K. Burgoon. (1996). “Behavioral Adaptation in Deceptive Transactions: Fact or Fiction: Reply to Levine and McCornack.” Human Communication Research 22, 589–603.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgoon, J. K. and D. B. Buller. (1994). “Interpersonal Deception: III. Effects of Deceit on Perceived Communication and Nonverbal Behavior Dynamics,” Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 18, 155–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgoon, J. K., D. B. Buller, and L. K. Guerrero. (1995). “Interpersonal Deception IX: Effects of Social Skill and Nonverbal Communication on Deception Success and Detection Accuracy,” Journal of Language and Social Psychology 14, 289–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgoon, J. K., D. B. Buller, L. Dillman, and J. B. Walther. (1995). “Interpersonal Deception IV: Effects of Suspicion on Perceived Communication and Nonverbal Behavior Dynamics,” Human Communication Research 22, 163–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgoon, J. K., D. B. Buller, A. S. Ebesu, C. H. White, and P. A. Rockwell. (1996). “Testing Interpersonal Deception Theory: Effects of Suspicion on Communication Behaviors and Perception,” Communication Theory 6, 243–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgoon, J. K., D. B. Buller, K. Floyd, and J. Grandpre. (1996). “Deceptive Realities: Sender, Receiver, and Observer Perspectives in Deceptive Conversations,” Communication Research 23, 724–748.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgoon, J. K., D. B. Buller, C. H. White, W. Afifi, and A. L. S. Buslig. (1999). “The Role of Conversation Involvement in Deceptive Interpersonal Interactions,” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 25, 669–685.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chartrand, T. L. and J. A. Bargh. (1999). “The Chameleon Effect: The Perception-Behavior Link and Social Interaction,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 76, 893–910.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, M. and D. Hadiks. (1995). “Demeanor and Credibility,” Semiotica 106, 5–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • DePaulo, B. M. (1994). “Spotting Lies: Can Humans Learn to do Better?” Current Directions in Psychological Science 3, 83–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • DePaulo, B. M. and S. E. Kirkendol. (1989). “The Motivational Impairment Effect in the Communication of Deception,” in J. C. Yuille (ed.), Credibility Assessment. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer, 51–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • DePaulo, B. M. and H. S. Friedman. (1998). “Nonverbal Communication,” in D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, and G. Lindzey (eds.), The Handbook of Social Psychology. Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill, 3–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • DePaulo, B. M., D. E. Anderson, and H. Cooper. (1999, October). Explicit and Implicit Deception Detection. Paper presented at the Society of Experimental Social Psychologists, St. Louis.

  • DePaulo, B. M., J. J. Lindsay, B. E. Malone, L. Muhlenbruck, K. Charlton, and H. Cooper. (2003). “Cues to Deception,” Psychological Bulletin 129, 74–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • DePaulo, B. M., J. L. Stone, and G. D. Lassiter. (1985). “Deceiving and Detecting Deceit,” in B. R. Schenkler (ed.), The Self and Social Life, New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, 323–370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekman, P. (1985/2001). Telling Lies. New York: W. W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekman, P. and W. V. Friesen. (1972). “Hand Movements,” Journal of Communication 22, 353–374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekman, P. and M. G. Frank. (1993). “Lies that Fail,” in M. Lewis and C. Saarni (eds.), Lying and Deception in Everyday Life. New York, NY: Guildford Press, 184–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekman, P. and W. V. Friesen. (1974). “Detecting Deception from the Body or Face,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 29, 288–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekman, P., W. V. Friesen, and K. R. Scherer. (1976). “Body Movement and Voice Pitch in Deceptive Interaction,” Semiotica 16, 23–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feeley, T. H., M. A. deTurck, and M. J. Young. (1995). “Baseline Familiarity in Lie Detection,” Communication Research Reports 12, 160–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, N. J. and W. L. Fleisher. (2002). Effective Interviewing and Interrogation Techniques. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gudjonsson, G. H. (1992). The Psychology of Interrogations, Confessions and Testimony. Chichester, England: Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrigan, J. A. and D. M. O'Connell. (1996). “Facial Movements During Anxiety States,” Personality and Individual Differences 21, 205–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hess, J. E. (1997). Interviewing and Interrogation for Law Enforcement. Reading, United Kingdom: Anderson Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hocking, J. E. and D. G. Leathers. (1980). “Nonverbal Indicators of Deception: A New Theoretical Perspective,” Communication Monographs 47, 119–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Höfer, E., L. Akehurst, and G. Metzger. (1996, August). Reality Monitoring: A Chance for Further Development of CBCA? Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the European Association on Psychology and Law in Sienna, Italy.

  • Inbau, F. E., J. E. Reid, and J. P. Buckley. (1986). Criminal Interrogation and Confessions, 3rd Ed. Baltimore, Md.: Williams & Wilkins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inbau, F. E., J. E. Reid, J. P. Buckley, and B. C. Jayne. (2001). Criminal Interrogation and Confessions, 4th Ed. Gaithersburg, Maryland: Aspen Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M. K. and C. L. Raye. (1981). “Reality Monitoring,” Psychological Review, 88, 67–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M. K. and C. L. Raye, C. L. (1998). “False Memories and Confabulation,” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2, 137–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M. K., S. Hashtroudi, and D. S. Lindsay. (1993). “Source Monitoring,” Psychological Bulletin 114, 3–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Köhnken, G. (1999, July). Statement Validity Assessment. Paper presented at the pre-conference programme of applied courses 'Assessing credibility' organised by the European Association of Psychology and Law, Dublin, Ireland.

  • Köhnken, G., E. Schimossek, E. Aschermann, and E. Höfer. (1995). “The Cognitive Interview and the Assessment of the Credibility of Adult's Statements,” Journal of Applied Psychology 80, 671–684.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krauss, R. M. (1981). “Impression Formation, Impression Management, and Nonverbal Behaviors,” in E. T. Higgins, C. P. Herman, and M. P. Zanna (eds.), Social Cognition: The Ontario Symposium, vol 1. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 323–341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraut, R. E. (1980). “Humans as Lie Detectors: Some Second Thoughts,” Journal of Communication 30, 209–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamb, M. E., K. J. Sternberg, P. W. Esplin, I. Hershkowitz, and Y. Orbach. (1997). “Assessing the Credibility of Children's Allegations of Sexual Abuse: A Survey of Recent Research,” Learning and Individual Differences 9, 175–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann, S. (2001). Suspects, Lies and Videotape: An Investigation into Telling and Detecting Lies in Police/Suspect Interviews. Unpublished PhD thesis. University of Portsmouth (United Kingdom), Psychology Department.

  • Mann, S., A. Vrij, and R. Bull. (in press). “Detecting True Lie: Police Officers' Ability to Detect Suspects' Lies,” Journal of Applied Psychology.

  • Mann, S., A. Vrij, and R. Bull. (2002). “Suspect, Lies and Videotapes: An Analysis of Authentic High-Stake Liars,” Law and Human Behavior 26, 365–376.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manzanero, A. L. and M. Diges. (1996). “Effects of Preparation on Internal and External Memories,” in G. Davies, S. Lloyd-Bostock, M. McMurran, and C. Wilson (eds.), Psychology, Law, and Criminal Justice: International Developments in Research and Practice. Berlin, Germany: Walter de Gruyter, 56–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G. R. and J. B. Stiff. (1993). Deceptive Communication. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moston, S. J. and T. Engelberg. (1993). “Police Questioning Techniques in Tape Recorded Interviews with Criminal Suspects,” Policing and Society 3, 223–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moston, S. J., G. M. Stephenson, and T. M. Williamson. (1992). “The Effects of Case Characteristics on Suspect Behaviour During Police Questioning,” British Journal of Criminology 32, 23–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ofshe, R. J. and R. A. Leo. (1997). “The Decision to Confess Falsely: Rational Choice and Irrational Action,” Denver University Law Review 74, 979–1112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raskin, D. C. and P. W. Esplin. (1991). “Statement Validity Assessment: Interview Procedures and Content Analysis of Children's Statements of Sexual Abuse,” Behavioral Assessment 13, 265–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, K. P., M. E. Lamb, J. L. Zale, and D. W. Randall. (1998). Qualitative Differences in Children's Accounts of Confirmed and Unconfirmed Incidents of Sexual Abuse. Paper presented at the biennial meeting of the American Psychology-Law Society, Redondo Beach, March 5-7.

  • Seager, P. (2001). Improving the Ability of Individuals to Detect Lies. Unpublished PhD-thesis. University of Hertfordshire (United Kingdom), Psychology Department.

  • Sporer, S. L. (1997). “The Less Travelled Road to Truth: Verbal Cues in Deception Detection in Accounts of Fabricated and Self-Experienced Events,” Applied Cognitive Psychology 11, 373–397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steller, M. (1989). “Recent Developments in Statement Analysis,” in J. C. Yuille (ed.), Credibility Assessment. Deventer, the Netherlands: Kluwer, 135–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steller, M. and G. Köhnken. (1989). “Criteria-Based Content Analysis,” in D. C. Raskin (ed.), Psychological Methods in Criminal Investigation and Evidence. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag, 217–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tecce, J. J. (1992). “Psychology, Physiology and Experimental,” in McGraw-Hill Yearbook of Science and Technology. New York: McGraw-Hill, 375–377.

    Google Scholar 

  • Undeutsch, U. (1967). “Beurteilung der Glaubhaftigkeit von Aussagen,” in U. Undeutsch (ed.), Handbuch der Psychologie Vol. 11: Forensische Psychologie. Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe, 26–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vrij, A. (2000). Detecting Lies and Deceit: The Psychology of Lying and the Implications for Professional Practice. Chichester: Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vrij, A. (2001). “Implicit Lie Detection,” The Psychologist 14, 58–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vrij, A. and G. R. Semin. (1996). “Lie Experts' Beliefs About Nonverbal Indicators of Deception,” Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 20, 65–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vrij, A. and S. Heaven. (1999). “Vocal and Verbal Indicators of Deception as a Function of Lie Complexity,” Psychology, Crime, & Law 4, 401–413.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vrij, A. and S. Mann. (2001). “Telling and Detecting Lies in a High-Stake Situation: The Case of a Convicted Murderer,” Applied Cognitive Psychology 15, 187–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vrij, A. and S. Mann. (2003). “Deceptive Responses and Detecting Deceit,” in P. W. Halligan, C. Bass, and D. Oakley (eds.), Malingering and Illness Deception: Clinical and Theoretical Perspectives. Oxford: University Press, 67–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vrij, A., K. Edward, and R. Bull. (2001a). “People's Insight into their Own Behaviour and Speech Content While Lying,” British Journal of Psychology 92, 373–389.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vrij, A., K. Edward, and R. Bull. (2001b). “Police Officers' Ability to Detect Deceit: The Benefit of Indirect Deception Measures,” Legal and Criminological Psychology 6, 185–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vrij, A., K. Edward, and R. Bull. (2001c). “Stereotypical Verbal and Nonverbal Responses While Deceiving Others,” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 27, 899–909.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vrij, A., K. Edward, K. P. Roberts, and R. Bull. (2000). “Detecting Deceit Via Analysis of Verbal and Nonverbal Behavior,” Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 24 (4), 239–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vrij, A., L. Akehurst, S. Soukara, and R. Bull. (in press). “Detecting Deceit Via Analyses of Verbal and Nonverbal Behaviour in Adults and Children,” Human Communication Research.

  • Vrij, J. (2001). “Verzet tegen angst,” Kontakt door Aantreden 56 (5), 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallbott, H. G. and K. R. Scherer. (1991). “Stress Specificities: Differential Effects of Coping Style, Gender, and Type of Stressor on Automatic Arousal, Facial Expression, and Subjective Feeling,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 61, 147–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, C. H. and J. K. Burgoon. (2001). “Adaptation and Communicative Design: Patterns of Interaction in Truthful and Deceptive Conversations,” Human Communication Research 27, 9–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiseman, R. (1995). “The Megalab Truth Test,” Nature 373, 391.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerman, M., B. M. DePaulo, and R. Rosenthal. (1981). “Verbal and Nonverbal Communication of Deception,” in L. Berkowitz (ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, vol. 14. New York, NY: Academic Press, 1–57.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Psychology Department, University of Portsmouth, King Henry Building, King Henry 1 Street, Portsmouth, PO1 2DY, UK

    Aldert Vrij & Samantha Mann

Authors
  1. Aldert Vrij
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Samantha Mann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vrij, A., Mann, S. Detecting Deception: The Benefit of Looking at a Combination of Behavioral, Auditory and Speech Content Related Cues in a Systematic Manner. Group Decision and Negotiation 13, 61–79 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:GRUP.0000011946.74290.bc

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:GRUP.0000011946.74290.bc

Keywords

Search

Navigation