Group Decision and Negotiation

, Volume 12, Issue 6, pp 501–515 | Cite as

An Integrated Group Decision-Making Method Dealing with Fuzzy Preferences for Alternatives and Individual Judgments for Selection Criteria

  • Guangquan Zhang
  • Jie Lu
Article

Abstract

Organizations often require decisions to be made by a group, and decision makers often have fuzzy preferences for alternatives and individual judgments when attempting to reach an optimal solution. In order to deal with the fuzziness of preference of decision makers, this paper proposes an integrated fuzzy group decision-making method. This method allows group members to express fuzzy preferences for alternatives and individual judgments for solution selection criteria. It also allowed for the weighting of group members. The method then aggregates these elements into a compromise group decision which is the most acceptable for the group as a whole. This method has been implemented and tested. An example is presented to illustrate the method.

decision-making methods fuzzy decision-making fuzzy preferences group decision-making 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alavi, M. and P. G. W. Keen. (1989). “Business Teams in an Information Age,” The Information Society 6(4), 179–195.Google Scholar
  2. Bhargava, H. K., R. Krishnan, and R. Muller. (1997). “Decision Support on Demand: Emerging Electronic Markets for Decision Technologies,” Decision Support Systems 3(19), 193–214.Google Scholar
  3. Bose, U., A. M. Davey, and D. L. Olson. (1997). “Multi-attribute Utility Methods in Group Decision Making: Past Applications and Potential for Inclusion in GDSS,” Omega 6(25), 691–706.Google Scholar
  4. Bui, T. (1989). Co-oP: A Group Decision Support System for Cooperative Multiple Criteria Group Decision-Making. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
  5. Chen, C. T. (2000). “Extensions of the TOPSIS for Group Decision-Making Under Fuzzy Environment,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems 1(114), 1–9.Google Scholar
  6. Chen, S. M. (2000). “Aggregation Fuzzy Opinions in the Group Decision-Making Environment,” Cybernetics and Systems 3(29), 363–376.Google Scholar
  7. Eom, S. B. (1998). “Relationships Between the Decision Support System Subspecialties and Reference Disciplines: An Empirical Investigation,” European Journal of Operational Research 1(104), 31–45.Google Scholar
  8. Hsu, H. M. and C. T. Chen. (1996). “Aggregation of Fuzzy Opinions under Group Decision-Making,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems 2(55), 241–253.Google Scholar
  9. Hwang, C. L. and A. S. M. Masud. (1979). Multiple Objective Decision-Making - Methods and Applications: A State of the Art Survey. Springer, New York.Google Scholar
  10. Iz, P. H. and M. T. Jelassi. (1990). “An Interactive Group Decision Aid for Multi-Objective Problems: An Empirical Assessment,” International Journal of Management Science 6(18), 245–253.Google Scholar
  11. Kacprzyk, J., M. Fedrizzi, and H. Nurmi. (1992). “Group Decision Making and Consensus Under Fuzzy Preference and Fuzzy Majority,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems 1(49), 21–31.Google Scholar
  12. Karacapilidis, N. and T. Gordon. (1995). “Dialectical Planning,” Proceedings of 14th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-95) - Workshop on Intelligent Manufacturing Systems, Montreal, Canada, 239–250.Google Scholar
  13. Karacapilidis, N. and C. Pappis. (2000). “Computer-Supported Collaborative Argumentation and Fuzzy Similarity Measures in Multiple Criteria Decision-Making,” Computers and Operations Research 7-8(27), 653–671.Google Scholar
  14. Korhonen, P. and J. Wallenius. (1990). “A Multiple Objective Linear Programming Decision Support System,” Decision Support Systems 6, 243–251.Google Scholar
  15. Lai, V. S., B. K. Wong, and W. Cheung. (2002). “Group Decision Making in a Multiple Criteria Environment: A Case Using the AHP in Software Selection,” European Journal of Operational Research 1(137), 134–144.Google Scholar
  16. Lee, H. M. (1996). “Group Decision-Making Using Fuzzy Set Theory for Evaluating the Rate of Aggregative Risk in Software Development,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems 2(80), 261–271.Google Scholar
  17. Lu, J. and M. A. Quaddus. (2001) “Integrating Knowledge Based Guidance System with Multiple Objective Decision Making,” The New Zealand Journal of Applied Computer and Information Technology 1(5), 53–59.Google Scholar
  18. Marimin, M., I. Hatono, and H. Tamura. (1998). “Linguistic Labels for Expressing Fuzzy Preference Relations in Fuzzy Group Decision Making,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics 2(28), 205–217.Google Scholar
  19. Nishizaki, I. and F. Seo. (1994). “Interactive Support for Fuzzy Trade-off Evaluation in Group Decision-Making,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems 3(68), 309–325.Google Scholar
  20. Rao, G. R. and M. Turoff. (2000). “A Hypermedia-Based Group Decision Support System to Support Collaborative Medical Decision-Making,” Decision Support Systems 2(30), 187–216.Google Scholar
  21. Sakawa, M. (1993). Fuzzy Sets and Interactive Multi-Objective Optimization. Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar
  22. Sakawa, M., H. Yano, and T. Yumine. (1987). “An Interactive Fuzzy Satisficing Method for Multi-Objective Linear Programming Problems and its Application,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics SMC 17, 654–661.Google Scholar
  23. Shim, J. P., M. Warkentin, J. F. Courtney, D. J. Power, R. Sharda, and C. Carlsson. (2002). “Past, Present, and Future of Decision Support Technology,” Decision Support Systems 2(33), 111–126.Google Scholar
  24. Vogel, D., R. Davison, and R. Shroff. (2001). “Socio-Cultural Learning: A Perspective on GSS Enabled Global Education,” Communications of AIS 9(7), 1–41.Google Scholar
  25. Yoon, K. P. and C. L. Hwang. (1995). Multiple Attribute Decision Making - An Introduction. SAGE Publications, Inc., Thousand Oaks.Google Scholar
  26. Zadeh, L. A. (1965). “Fuzzy Sets,” Inform and Control 3(8), 338–353.Google Scholar
  27. Zhang, G. Q. (1998). Fuzzy Number-Valued Measure Theory. Tsinghua University Press, Beijing.Google Scholar
  28. Zhang, G. Q. and J. Lu. (2002). “Group Decision Making Method with Fuzzy Preference of Decision Makers,” The International Conference of Group Decision and Negotiation, Perth, Australia, 26-28, August, 2002.Google Scholar
  29. Zhang, G. Q., Y. H. Wu, M. Remia, and J. Lu. (2002). “An a-fuzzy Max Order and Solution of Linear Constrained Fuzzy Optimization Problems,” Proceedings of the International Conference on Computational Mathematics and Modeling, Bangkok, Thailand, May 22-24, 2002, and East-West Journal of Mathematics Special Vol. May 2002, 84.Google Scholar
  30. Zhang, G. Q., Y. H. Wu, M. Remia, and J. Lu. (2003). “Formulation of Fuzzy Linear Programming Problems as Four-Objective Constrained Problems,” Applied Mathematics and Computation 2-3(139), 383–399.Google Scholar
  31. Zimmermann, H. J. (1978). “Fuzzy Programming and Linear Programming with Several Objective Functions,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems 1(1), 45–55.Google Scholar
  32. Zimmermann, H. J. (1987). Fuzzy Sets, Decision Making and Expert Systems. Kluwer-Nijhoff Publishing, Dordecht.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Guangquan Zhang
    • 1
  • Jie Lu
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Information TechnologyUniversity of Technology, SydneyBroadwayAustralia

Personalised recommendations