Advertisement

Grammars

, Volume 6, Issue 3, pp 155–168 | Cite as

Modeling Chaotic Series by Simple Eco-Grammar Systems with Reproduction, Death and Maturation of Agents

  • Sergio Anchorena
  • Blanca Cases
Article
  • 18 Downloads

Abstract

Grammar systems are abstract models of computation, in the field of Formal Language Theory, created to study the agent systems proposed by Artificial Intelligence. Eco-Grammar or EG systems are grammatical models of ecosystems. Simple Eco-Grammar Systems or SEG systems are a sub-class of EG. In this work we propose a model of SEG systems whose agents have capabilities ofReproduction, Death and Maturation, called SEG[RDM]. They are able to represent the dynamics of the Logistic equation developed by May in 1973, which is one of the main references in the study of chaos in the dynamics of populations in ecosystems. This work is going on the direction of approaching Artificial Intelligence, Theoretical Computer Sciences and Complex Systems.

artificial life Complex Systems Grammar Systems logistic equation multiagent systems 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alfonseca, M., A. Ortega and A. Suárez. Cellular Automata and Probabilistic L Systems, In Grammars and Automata for String Processing: From Mathematics and Computer Science to Biology, and Back. Taylor and Francis, London, 2003.Google Scholar
  2. Anchorena S. and B. Cases. Eco-Grammars to Model Biological Systems: Adding Probabilities to Agents. Proceedings of the European Conference on Artificial Life. ECAL 2001: Springer, Berlin, pp. 66'75, 2001.Google Scholar
  3. Cases, B. and M. Alfonseca. Eco-Grammar Systems applied to the analysis of the dynamics of populations in artificial worlds, In Proceedings of the International Workship on Grammar Systems 2000. Silesian University, Opava, pp. 265'281, 2000.Google Scholar
  4. Csuhaj-VarjÚ, E., J. Dassow, J. Kelemen and G. Paaun. Grammar Systems. A Grammatical Approach to Distribution and Cooperation, Gordon and Breach, London, 1994.Google Scholar
  5. Csuhaj-VarjÚ, J. Kelemen, A. Kelemenová and G. Paaun. Eco-Grammar Systems: A Grammatical Framework for Life-Like Interactions, Artificial Life, 3(1): 1'28, 1997.Google Scholar
  6. Dassow, J., G. Paaun and G. Rozenberg, Grammar Systems, In Handbook of Formal Languages. G. Rozenberg and A. Salomaa (eds.), vol. 2, pp. 155'210, Springer, Berlin, 1997.Google Scholar
  7. Freund, R. and A. Kelemenová eds., Proceedings of the International Workshop on Grammar Systems 2000, Silesian University, Opava, 2000.Google Scholar
  8. Martín-Vide, C. and V. Mitrana. Grammars and Automata for String Processing: From Mathematics and Computer Science to Biology, and Back. Taylor and Francis, London, 2003.Google Scholar
  9. Minsky, M. La Sociedad de la Mente. La Inteligencia Humana a la Luz de la Inteligencia Artificial; Galápago, Argentina, 1986.Google Scholar
  10. Montero, M. and F. Morán. Biofísica: Procesos de Auto-organización en Biología. Eudema Universidad, Madrid, 1992.Google Scholar
  11. Paaun, G. ed., Artificial Life: Grammatical Models, Black Sea University Press, Bucharest, 1995.Google Scholar
  12. Pollack, J.B. Connectionism: past, present, and future, Artificial Intelligence Review, 3, 1989.Google Scholar
  13. Rozenberg, G. and A. Salomaa. eds., Handbook of Formal Languages, 3 vols. Springer, Berlin, 1997.Google Scholar
  14. Salomaa, A. Developmental Models for Artificial Life: Basics of L Systems. In Artificial Life: Grammatical Models, G. Paaun, ed., Black Sea University, pp. 22'31, Bucharest, 1995.Google Scholar
  15. Solé, R. and S. Manrubia. Orden y Caos en Sistemas Complejos, Edicions UPC, Barcelona, 1996.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sergio Anchorena
    • 1
  • Blanca Cases
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Computer Languages and SystemsUniversity of the Basque CountrySan Sebastian-DonostiaSpain

Personalised recommendations