Advertisement

GeoJournal

, Volume 59, Issue 3, pp 191–207 | Cite as

Advances in travel geometry and urban modelling

  • Geoffrey Hyman
  • Les MayhewEmail author
Article

Abstract

Urban travel geometry is a generalization of patterns of movement in cities and regions where route configuration and prevailing traffic speeds constrain or direct movement in distinctive and repeatable patterns. In this paper we use these properties to construct time surfaces on which distance equates to the time of travel in the urban plane. Such surfaces can be two- or three-dimensional and are useful in the study of urban structure, locational analysis, transport planning and traffic management. A particular niche addressed in this paper is non-conformal time surface transformations in which speed or the cost of travel is constrained according to co-ordinate directions. It is argued that such models may be more suited to gridded and orbital-radial cities than previously used conformal transformations. After explaining the rationale behind the approach, a mathematical basis is developed and several calibrated examples are provided based on regions in the UK. The paper concludes with some examples of potential applications, and an annex provides a detailed mathematical framework.

isochrones locational analysis map transformations time surfaces urban geometry 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alonso W., 1965: Location and Land Use. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
  2. Angel S. and Hyman G., 1976: Urban Fields. Pion, London.Google Scholar
  3. Angel S. and Hyman G., 1972: Transformations and Geographic Theory. Geographical Analysis 4(4): 99–118.Google Scholar
  4. Anjoumani A., 1981: Market area analysis with a rectangular grid network. Environment and Planning A 13: 943–954.Google Scholar
  5. Hyman G. and Mayhew L., 1983: On the geometry of emergency service medical provision in cities. Environment and Planning A 15: 1669–1690.Google Scholar
  6. Hyman G. and Mayhew L., 2000: The properties of route catchments in orbital-radial cities. Environment and Planning B: Planning and design 27: 843–863.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hyman G. and Mayhew L., 2001: Market area analysis under orbital-radial routing with applications to the study of airport location. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 25: 195–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hyman G. and Mayhew L., 2002: Optimising the Benefits of Urban Road User Charging. Transport Policy 9: 189–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Klein R., 1988: Abstract Voronoi diagrams and their applications. Lecture notes in Computer Science 333 (International Workshop on Computational Geometry). Berlin Springer-Verlag, 138–154.Google Scholar
  10. Krause E.F., 1986: Taxicab geometry: An adventure in non-Euclidean geometry. Dover Publications, Mineola, NY.Google Scholar
  11. Mayhew L., 1981: Automated isochrones and the locations of emergency medical facilities in cities. Professional Geographer 33: 423–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Mayhew L., 1986: Urban Hospital Location. George Allen & Unwin Ltd, UK.Google Scholar
  13. Mayhew L., 2000: Using geometry to evaluate strategic road proposals in orbital-radial Cities. Urban Studies 37(13): 2515–2532.Google Scholar
  14. Okabe A., Boots B. and Sugihara K., 1992: Spatial Tessellations-Concepts and Applications of Voronoi Diagrams. John Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  15. Tobler W., 1963: Geographic area and map projections. Geographical Review 53: 59–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Tobler W., 1997: Visualizing the Impact of Transportation on Spatial Relations. Presentation to the Western Regional Science Association meeting, Hawaii. Department of Geography, The University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106-4060.Google Scholar
  17. Tobler W., 1999: The World is shriveling as it shrinks? Presentation to International ESRI Conference, San Diego, California.Google Scholar
  18. Tobler W., 2001: Quibla Maps. Presentation to the California Map Society, University of Southern California.Google Scholar
  19. Wardrop J.G., 1969: Minimum cost paths in urban areas. Beitrage zur Theorie des Verkehrsflusses, Strassenbau und Strassenverkehrstechnik 86: 184–190.Google Scholar
  20. Warntz W., 1967: Global science and the tyranny of space. Papers and Proceedings of the Regional Science Association 19: 7–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department for TransportU.K
  2. 2.Faculty of Actuarial Science & StatisticsCass Business School, City UniversityLondonU.K.

Personalised recommendations