Geotechnical & Geological Engineering

, Volume 22, Issue 3, pp 439–455 | Cite as

Geotechnical aspects and ground response studies in Bhuj earthquake, India

  • T. G. Sitharam
  • L. Govindaraju


The extent of damage and affected areas in Bhuj earthquake (26th January 2001) has provided a unique opportunity to evaluate a wide range of geotechnical issues. A large area in the Rann of Kutch experienced massive liquefaction resulting in ground subsidence and lateral flow. A large number of dams in the Kutch district suffered moderate to severe damages. Many buildings were damaged and collapsed in the city of Ahmedabad situated on the bank of the Sabarmati River. In this paper, the ground response studies at a site in Ahmedabad City along with observations of geotechnical aspects such as ground cracking, sand volcanoes and liquefaction of soils associated with the Bhuj earthquake are discussed. The ground response studies indicate that the varying degree of damage to multistorey buildings in Ahmedabad in the close proximity of Sabarmati river area was essentially due to the collapse and undesirable settlement of partly saturated silty sand deposits. Large settlements are attributed to amplification of the ground and the near resonance condition.

amplitude earthquake frequency liquefaction seismic response of soils 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bhandari, N. and Sharma, B.K. (2001) Damage pattern due to January, 2001 Bhuj Earthquake, India: importance of site amplification and interference of shear waves, Abstracts of International Conference on Seismic Hazard with Particular reference to Bhuj Earthquake of January 26, 2001, 3-5 October, New Delhi, pp. 19-21.Google Scholar
  2. Erten, D. (1995) Cyclic undrained behavior of silty sand, Journal of Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 14, 115–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Kusala, R., Rajendran, C.P., Mahesh, T. and Tuttle, P. (2001) The 2001 Kutch (Bhuj) earthquake: coseismic surface features and their significance, Current Science, 80(11) (Research Article).Google Scholar
  4. Murthy, C.V.R., Umesh, D., Jaswant, A., Shailedra, K., Chaubey and Sudhir, K. J. (2001) Preliminary field report on Gujarat Eathquake, The Indian Concrete Journal, Earthquake report, pp. 4, News Letter, April, 2001, Indian Geotechnical Society.Google Scholar
  5. NISA II/DISPLAY III. (1998) Training Manual Version 8.0, Engineering Mechanics Research Corporation, MI, USA.Google Scholar
  6. Rao, K.S. and William M.K. (2001) The Bhuj earthquake and lessons from the damages, News Letter, Indian Geotechnical Society, 33(2), 3–10.Google Scholar
  7. Schnable, P.B., Lysmer, J. and Seed, H.B. (1972) SHAKE-A computer program for earthquake response analysis of horizontally layered sites, EERC Report 72-12. Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
  8. Shannon, H-H. L. (1992) Analysis of the multicollinearity of regression equations of shear wave velocities, Soils and Foundations, 32(1), 205–214.Google Scholar
  9. Sitharam, T.G., Srinivasa Murthy, B.R. and Aravind, M.K. (2001) A post-mortem report of the collapse of the structures in Ahmedabad during Bhuj earthquake, Proceedings Indian Geotechnical Conference, 14-16 December, Indore (M.P.), India, pp. 344-347.Google Scholar
  10. Srivastav, S.K. (2001) Bhuj earthquake of 26th January, 2001-some pertinent questions, Abstracts of International Conference on Seismic Hazard with Particular Reference to Bhuj Earthquake of January 26, 2001, 3-5 October, New Delhi, India, pp. 3-5.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • T. G. Sitharam
    • 1
  • L. Govindaraju
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Civil EngineeringIndian Institute of ScienceBangaloreIndia

Personalised recommendations