Advertisement

Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems

, Volume 68, Issue 2, pp 155–164 | Cite as

Fluxes of CO2 and CH4 in soil profiles of a mountainous watershed of Nepal as influenced by land use, temperature, moisture and substrate addition

  • B.M. Shrestha
  • B.K. Sitaula
  • B.R. Singh
  • R.M. Bajracharya
Article

Abstract

Effects of land use, moisture, temperature and substrate on production of CO2 and consumption of CH4 were measured in a series of laboratory incubation experiments on bulk soil samples from 0–10, 10–20, 20–40, 40–60, 60–80 and 80–100 cm soil depths under four dominant land uses [forest, grazing land, irrigated rice on level terraces (Khet), and upland maize–millet on sloping terraces (Bari)] of Mardi watershed (area=144 km2), Nepal. In addition, baseline physical and chemical properties of these soils were measured. The production of CO2-C day−1 per unit soil organic carbon (SOC) content in topsoil was lowest in grazing land, indicating a possibility of higher C sequestration with this land use than with other land uses. There was a decreasing trend of CO2 emission with soil depth in all land uses, as was also the case with the SOC content. The CO2 emission was increased by 90, 58, 27 and 23% for Bari, Khet, grazing and forest soil, respectively, with increase in moisture level from 40 to 60% (w/w). The CO2 release from forest soil went up from 15 to 50 μg CO2 g−1 dry soil with increase in temperature from 5 to 15 °C and it further increased to 67 μg CO2 g−1 at 20 °C with estimated Q10 values of 3.4 and 1.8, respectively. Significantly higher amounts of CO2 were emitted from all the land use types upon addition of glucose to the soil, indicating high potential of microbial activity. Consumption of CH4 was more rapid in the soil from 10 to 20 cm depth for all the land use types. There was a 89% increase in CH4 consumption in forest soil with increase in moisture level from 40 to 60%, while it was decreased by 38, 73, and 40% for Khet, Bari and grazing soil, respectively. Addition of (NH4)2SO4 inhibited CH4 oxidation in soils of all land uses, indicating a negative effect of N fertiliser input on CH4 uptake in soil.

CO2 emission CH4 consumption Land use Moisture Temperature 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson J.M. and Ingram J.S.I. (eds) 1993. Total organic carbon in soil: colorimetric method. In: Tropical Soil Biology and Fertility: A Handbook of Methods. 2nd edn. CAB International, Wallingford, UK, pp. 62–64.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson J.P.E. and Domsch K.H. 1978. A physiological method for the quantitative measurement of microbial biomass in soil. Soil Biol. Biochem. 10: 215–221.Google Scholar
  3. Awasthi K.D., Sitaula B.K., Singh B.R. and Bajracharya R.M. 2002. Land use changes and geo-morphometric analysis using GIS for two mountain watersheds of western Nepal. Land Degrad. Dev. 13: 1–19.Google Scholar
  4. Bajracharya R.M., Lal R. and Kimble J.M. 1998. Long-term tillage effect on soil organic carbon distribution in aggregates and primary particle fractions of two Ohio soils. In: Lal R., Kimble J.M., Follett R.F. and Stewart B.A. (eds), Management of Carbon Sequestration in Soil. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, pp. 113–123.Google Scholar
  5. Bajracharya R.M., Lal R. and Kimble J.M. 2000. Erosion effect on carbon dioxide concentration and carbon flux from an Ohio Alfisol. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 64: 694–700.Google Scholar
  6. Batjes N.H. 1996. The total C and N in soils of the world. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 47: 151–163.Google Scholar
  7. Batjes N.H. 1998. Mitigation of atmospheric CO2 concentrations by increased carbon sequestration in the soil. Biol. Fertil. Soils 27: 230–235.Google Scholar
  8. Bedard C. and Knowles R. 1989. Physiology, biochemistry, and specific inhibitors of CH4, NH4+, and co-oxidation by methanotrophs and nitrifiers. Microbiol. Rev. 53(1): 68–84.Google Scholar
  9. Blake G.R. and Harte K.H. 1986. Bulk density. In: Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 1. Physical and Mineralogical Methods, Agronomy Monograph. 2nd edn. American Society of Agronomy-Soil Science Society of America, Madison, WI, pp. 425–442.Google Scholar
  10. De Leenheer L. and De Boodt M. 1954. Discussion on aggregate analysis of soils by wet sieving. Transactions of the 5th International Congress on Soil Science, Leopoldville, Vol. 2, pp. 111–117.Google Scholar
  11. Dlugokencky E.J., Masaire K.A., Lang P.M., Tans P.P., Steele L.P. and Nisbet E.G. 1994. A dramatic decrease in the growth rate of atmospheric methane in northern hemisphere during 1992. Geophys. Res. Lett. 21: 45–48.Google Scholar
  12. Ekholm E.P. 1976. Losing Ground: Environmental Stress and Food Prospect. Vol. 24. WW Norton and Co., New York.Google Scholar
  13. Gilmour D.A. 1988. Not seeing the trees for the forest: a reappraisal of the deforestation crisis in two hills of Nepal. Mt. Res. Dev. 8(4): 343–350.Google Scholar
  14. Gorham E. 1991. Northern peatlands: role in the carbon cycle and probable responses to climatic warming. Ecol. Appl. 1: 182–195.Google Scholar
  15. Gurung N.R. 2000. Forest degradation/regeneration in the hills of Nepal: a study at watershed level. Noragric M.Sc. Thesis. Centre for International Environment and Development Studies, Agricultural University of Norway, Äs, Norway.Google Scholar
  16. Guthman J. 1997. Representing crisis: the theory of Himalayan environmental degradation and project of development in Post-Rana Nepal. Dev. Change 28(1): 45–69.Google Scholar
  17. Hansen S., Mæhlum J.E. and Bakken L.R. 1993. N2O and CH4 fluxes in soil influenced by fertilisation and tractor traffic. Soil Biol. Biochem. 25: 621–630.Google Scholar
  18. Houghton R.A. and Hackler J.L. 1999. Emission of carbon from forestry and land-use changes in tropical Asia. Glob. Change Biol. 5: 481–492.Google Scholar
  19. Hutsch B.W. 1998. Tillage and land use effect on methane oxidation rates and their vertical profile in soil. Biol. Fertil. Soils 27: 284–292.Google Scholar
  20. IPCC 1995. Climate Change 1995. Working Group 1. IPCC, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
  21. IPCC 2000. Land use, land-use change and forestry. IPCC special report. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
  22. Ives J.D. 1987. The theory of Himalayan environmental degradation-its validity and application challenged by recent research. Mt. Res. Dev. 7(3): 189–199.Google Scholar
  23. Jiang K., Masui T., Morita T. and Matsuoka Y. 2000. Long-term GHG emission scenario for Asia-Pacific and the world. Technol. Forecast Soc. 63(2-3): 207–229.Google Scholar
  24. Johansson M., Pell M. and Stenström J. 1998. Kinetics of substrate induced respiration (SIR) and denitrification: application to a soil amended with silver. Ambio 27: 40–44.Google Scholar
  25. Joshi J., Bhattarai T.N., Sthapit K.M. and Omura H. 1997. Soil erosion and sediment disaster in Nepal-A review. J. Fac. A Kyu. Univ. 42: 491–502.Google Scholar
  26. Joshi M., Mer G.S., Singh S.P. and Rawat Y.S. 1991. Seasonal pattern of total soil respiration in undisturbed and disturbed ecosystems of central Himalayas. Biol. Fertil. Soils 11: 267–272.Google Scholar
  27. Lal R. 1999. Soil management and restoration for C sequestration to mitigate the accelerated greenhouse effect. Prog. Environ. Sci. 1: 307–326.Google Scholar
  28. Lal R. 2002. Soil carbon dynamics in cropland and rangeland. Environ. Pollut. 116: 353–362.Google Scholar
  29. Lal R., Kimble J. and Stewart B.A. 1995. World soils as a source or sink for radiatively-active gases. In: Lal R. and Stewart B.A. (eds), Soil Management and Greenhouse Effect. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FL, pp. 1–8.Google Scholar
  30. Lomander A., Katterer T. and Andren O. 1998. Carbon dioxide evolution from top-and subsoil as affected by moisture and constant and fluctuating temperature. Soil Biol. Biochem. 30: 2017–2022.Google Scholar
  31. McLean E.O. 1982. Soil pH and lime requirement. In: Page A.L. (ed), Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 2. Chemical and Microbiological Properties. 2nd edn. American Society of Agronomy Monograph No. 9, ASA-SSSA, Inc., Madison, WI, pp. 199–224.Google Scholar
  32. Mer J.L. and Roger P. 2001. Production, oxidation, emission and consumption of methane by soils: a review. Eur. J. Soil Biol. 37: 25–50.Google Scholar
  33. Metz J.J. 1991. A reassessment of the causes and severity of Nepal environmental crisis. World Dev. 19(7): 805–820.Google Scholar
  34. Ojima D.S., Valentine D.W., Mosier A.R., Parton W.J. and Schimel D.S. 1993. Effect of land use change on methane oxidation in temperate forest and grassland soils. Chemosphere 26: 675–685.Google Scholar
  35. Paustian K., Robertson G.P. and Elliott E.T. 1995. Management impacts on carbon storage and gas fluxes (CO2, CH4) in midlatitude cropland. In: Lal et al. (eds), Soil and Global Change.Advances in Soil Science. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, pp. 69–83.Google Scholar
  36. Qi Y., Xu M. and Wu J. 2002. Temperature sensitivity of soil respiration and its effect on ecosystem carbon budget: nonlinearity begets surprises. Ecol. Model. 153: 131–142.Google Scholar
  37. Robertson G.P., Paul E.A. and Hardwood R.R. 2000. Greenhouse gases in intensive agriculture: contribution of individual gases to the radiative forcing of the atmosphere. Science 289: 1922–1925.Google Scholar
  38. SAS Institute 2000. SAS/Procedures Guide, Release 8 edition. SAS, Cary, NC.Google Scholar
  39. Singh S., Kumar S. and Jain M.C. 1997. Methane emission from two Indian soils planted with different rice cultivators. Biol. Fertil. Soils 25: 285–289.Google Scholar
  40. Singh S., Singh J.S. and Kashyap A.K. 1998. Contrasting pattern of methane flux in rice agriculture. Naturwissenschaften 85: 494–497.Google Scholar
  41. Sitaula B.K. and Bakken L.R. 1992. Sources and sink of climate gases (N2O, CH4, CO2 ), contribution of temperate forest soils and spatial variability. In: Lag J. (ed), Proceedings of International Symposium 'Chemical Climatology and Geomedical Problems', Oslo 1992. The Norwegian Academy of Science and Letters, Oslo, Norway.Google Scholar
  42. Sitaula B.K., Luo J. and Bakken L.R. 1992. Rapid analysis of climate gases by wide bore capillary gas chromatography. J. Environ. Qual. 21: 493–496.Google Scholar
  43. Sitaula B.K., Hansen S., Sitaula J.I.B. and Bakken L. 2000. Methane oxidation potentials and fluxes in agricultural soil: effect of fertilisation and soil compaction. Biogeochemistry 48: 323–339.Google Scholar
  44. Stenström J., Stenberg B. and Johanson M. 1998. Kinetics of substrate-induced respiration (SIR): theory. Ambio 27: 35–39.Google Scholar
  45. Thapa G.B. 1995. Land use land management and environment in a subsistence mountain economy in Nepal. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 57: 57–71.Google Scholar
  46. Winkler J.P., Cherry R.S. and Schlesinger W.H. 1996. The Q10 relationship of microbial respiration in a temperate forest soil. Soil Biol. Biochem. 28: 1067–1072.Google Scholar
  47. Yavit J.B., Downey D.M., Lang G.E. and Sextone A.J. 1990. Methane consumption in two temperate forest soils. Biogeochemistry 9: 39–52.Google Scholar
  48. Yavit J.B., Lang G.E. and Wieder R.K. 1987. Control of carbon mineralisation to CH4 and CO2 in anaerobic, Sphagnum-derived peat from Big Run Bog, West Virginia. Biogeochemistry 4: 141–157.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • B.M. Shrestha
  • B.K. Sitaula
  • B.R. Singh
  • R.M. Bajracharya

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations