Advertisement

International Journal of Fracture

, Volume 127, Issue 2, pp 119–146 | Cite as

On the use of space-time finite elements in the solution of elasto-dynamic fracture problems

  • Hao HuangEmail author
  • Francesco Costanzo
Article

Abstract

The use of a discontinuous Galerkin (DG) formulation for the solution of dynamic fracture problems in linear elastic media with and without cohesive zones is explored. The results are compared with closed-form as well as numerical solutions available from the literature. The effectiveness of the space-time finite element method in the study of dynamic fracture problems is demonstrated, especially in those cases in which dynamic fracture occurs along with time discontinuous loading.

Dynamic fracture discontinuous Galerkin FEM space-time finite element method 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allen, D.H., Jones, R.H. and Boyd, J.G. Boyd: (1994). 'Micromechanical Analysis of a Continuous Fiber Metal Matrix Composite including the Effects of Matrix Viscoplasticity and Evolving Damage'. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids 42, 505–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barenblatt, G.I.: (1962). 'The Mathematical Theory of Equilibrium Cracks in Brittle Fracture'. In: A.S. Argon (ed.): Advances in Applied Mechanics, Vol. VII. New York: Academic Press, pp. 55–129.Google Scholar
  3. Costanzo, F.: (1998). A continuum theory of cohesive zone models: Deformation and constitutive equations. International Journal of Engineering Science 36, 1763–1792.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  4. Costanzo, F.: (2001). An analysis of 3D crack propagation using cohesive zone models and the theory of configurational forces. Mathematics and Mechanics of Solids 6(2), 149–173.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. Costanzo, F. and Allen, D.H. (1995). A continuum thermodynamic analysis of cohesive zone models'. International Journal of Engineering Science 33, 2197–2219.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  6. Costanzo, F. and Huang, H. (2003). Proof of unconditional stability for a single-field discontinuous Galerkin finite element formulation for linear elastodynamics. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering. Submitted for publication.Google Scholar
  7. Costanzo, F. and Walton, J.R. (1997). A study of dynamic crack growth in elastic materials using a cohesive zone model. International Journal of Engineering Science 35, 1085–1114.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  8. Costanzo, F. and Walton, J.R. (2002). Steady growth of a crack with a temperature sensitive cohesive zone. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids 50, 1649–1679.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  9. Dugdale, D.S. (1960). Yielding of steel sheets containing slits. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids 8, 100–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fineberg, J., Gross, S.P., Marder, M. and Swinney, H.L. (1992). Instability in the propagation of fast cracks. Physical Review B 45(10), 5146–5154.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  11. Fineberg, J. and Marder, M.P. (1999). Instability in dynamic fracture. Physics Reports 313, 1–108.CrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  12. Freund, L.B. (1990). Dynamic Fracture Mechanics, Cambridge monographs on mechanics and applied mathematics. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Geubelle, P.H. and Breitenfeld, M.S. (1997). Numerical analysis of dynamic debonding under anti-plane shear loading. International Journal of Fracture 85, 265–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Geubelle, P.H. and Rice, J.R. (1995). A spectral method for three-dimensional elastodynamic fracture problems. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids 43(11), 1791–1824.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  15. Gurtin, M.E. (1981). An Introduction to Continuum Mechanics, Vol. 158 of Mathematics in science and engineering. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  16. Gurtin, M.E. and Podio Guidugli, P. (1996). Configurational forces and the basic laws for crack propagation. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids 44(6), 905–927.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  17. Gurtin, M.E. and Shvartsman, M.M. (1997). Configurational forces and the dynamics of planar cracks in threedimensional bodies. Journal of Elasticity 48, 167–191.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  18. Gurtin, M.E. and Yatomi, C. (1980). On the energy release rate in elastodynamic crack propagation. Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis 74, 231–247.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  19. Huang, H. (2002). 'A Space-Time Finite Element Method for the Modeling of Dynamic Fracture in Elastic Materials with Cohesive Zones'. Ph.d., The Pennsylvania State University.Google Scholar
  20. Huang, H. and Costanzo, F. (2002). On the use of space-time finite elements in the solution of elasto-dynamic problems with strain discontinuities'. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 191(46), 5315–5343.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  21. Hughes, T.J.R. and Hulbert, G.M. (1988). Space-time finite element methods for elastodynamics: Formulations and error estimates. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 66(3), 339–363.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  22. Hulbert, G.M. and Hughes, T.J.R. (1990). Space-time finite element methods for second-order hyperbolic equations. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 84(3), 327–348.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  23. Johnson, E. (1992). Process region influence on crack branching. International Journal of Fracture 57, R27–R29.Google Scholar
  24. Kanninen, M.F. and Popelar, C.H. (1985). Advanced Fracture Mechanics. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Kishimoto, K., Aoki, S. and Sakata, M. (1980). On the path independent J-integral. Engineering Fracture Mechanics 13, 387–394.Google Scholar
  26. Liu, W.K., Chang, H., Chen, J.-S. and Belytschko, T. (1988). Arbitrary langrangian-eulerian Petrov-Galerkin finite elements for nonlinear continua. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 68, 259–310.Google Scholar
  27. Ma, C.-C. (1990). A dynamic crack model with viscous resistance to crack opening: Antiplane shear mode. Engineering Fracture Mechanics 37(1), 127–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Marder, M. (1999). Molecular dynamics of cracks. Computing in Science and Engineering 48–55.Google Scholar
  29. Marder,M. and Gross, S.P. (1995). Origin of crack tip instabilities. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids 43, 1–48.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  30. Marder, M. and Liu, X. (1993). Instability in lattice fracture. Physical Review Letters 71(15), 2417–2420.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  31. Nakamura, T., Shih, C.F. and Freund, L.B. (1985). Computational methods based on an energy integral in dynamic fracture. International Journal of Fracture 27, 229–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Needleman, A. (1987). A continuum model for void nucleation by inclusion debonding. Journal of Applied Mechanics 54, 525–531.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  33. Nguyen, Q.S. (1981). 'A Thermodynamic Description of the Running Crack Problem'. In: S. Nemat-Nasser (ed.): Three-Dimensional Constitutive Relations and Ductile Fracture, IUTAMSymposium. Durdan: North-Holland Publishing Company International Union of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics (IUTAM), pp. 315–330.Google Scholar
  34. Nishioka, T. and Atluri, S.N. (1983). Path-independent integrals, energy release rates, and general solutions of near-tip fields in mixed-mode dynamic fracture mechanics. Engineering Fracture Mechanics 18(1), 1–22.Google Scholar
  35. Press, W.H., Teukolsky, S.A., Vetterling, W.T. and Flannery, B.P. (1994). Numerical Recipes in FORTRAN-2nd Edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Siegmund, T., Fleck, N.A. and Needleman, A. (1997). Dynamic crack growth across an interface. International Journal of Fracture 85, 381–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Xu, X.-P. and Needleman, A. (1994). nNumerical simulations of fast crack growth in brittle solids. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids 42(9), 1397–1434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Xu, X.-P. and Needleman, A. (1996). Numerical simulation of dynamic crack growth along an interface'. International Journal of Fracture 74, 289–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Yang, B. and Ravi-Chandar, K. (1996). On the role of the process zone in dynamic fracture. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids 44, 1955–1976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Zhou, S.J., Lomdahl, P.S., Thomson, R. and Holian, B.L. (1995). Dynamic crack processes via molecular dynamics. Technical Report LA-UR-95-3721, Los Alamos National Laboratory.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil and Environmental EngineeringUniversity of South FloridaTampaUSA
  2. 2.Engineering Science and Mechanics DepartmentThe Pennsylvania State UniversityUniversity ParkUSA

Personalised recommendations