Why Occam’S Razor
Ensemble theories have received a lot of interest recently as a means of explaining a lot of the detailed complexity observed in reality by a vastly simpler description “every possibility exists” and a selection principle (Anthropic Principle) “we only observe that which is consistent with our existence.” In this paper I show why, in an ensemble theory of the universe, we should be inhabiting one of the elements of that ensemble with least information content that satisfies the anthropic principle. This explains the effectiveness of aesthetic principles such as Occam’s razor in predicting usefulness of scientific theories. I also show, with a couple of reasonable assumptions about the phenomenon of consciousness, that the linear structure of quantum mechanics can be derived.
Key wordsOccam’s razor anthropic principle ensemble theories multiverse failure of induction foundation of quantum mechanics
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.E. P. Wigner,Symmetries and Reflections (MIT Press, Cambridge, 1967).Google Scholar
- 2.J. D. Barrow and F. J. Tipler,The Anthropic Cosmological Principle (Clarendon, Oxford, 1986).Google Scholar
- 4.Jürgen Schmidhuber, “A computer scientist’s view of life, the universe and everything,” In C. Freska, M. Jantzen, and R. Valk, eds.,Foundations of Computer Science: Potential-Theory-Cognition, volume 1337 ofLecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 201–208 (Springer, Berlin, 1997).Google Scholar
- 5.Jürgen Schmidhuber, “Algorithmic theories of everything,” Technical Report IDSIA-20-00, IDSIA, Galleria 2, 6928 Manno (Lugano), Switzerland, 2000; arXiv:quant-ph/0011122.Google Scholar
- 7.J. Leslie,The End of the World (Routledge, London, 1996).Google Scholar
- 9.John Leslie,Universes (Routledge, New York, 1989).Google Scholar
- 10.Bruno Marchai, “Conscience et mécanisme,” Technical Report TR/IRIDIA/95, Brussels University, 1995.Google Scholar
- 11.Bruno Marchai, “Computation, consciousness and the quantum,”Teorie e modelli 6, 29–44 (2001).Google Scholar
- 16.Ramamurti Shankar,Principles of Quantum Mechanics (Plenum, New York, 1980).Google Scholar
- 17.Victor Stenger, “The comprehensible cosmos,” Draft book: http://spot.colorado.edu/~vstenger/nothing.html.Google Scholar
- 19.Steven Weinberg,Dreams of a Final Theory (Pantheon, New-York, 1992).Google Scholar
- 20.Bryce de Witt and R. Neill Graham,The Many Worlds Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1973).Google Scholar