Foundations of Science

, Volume 9, Issue 3, pp 267–283

Abduction as a Logic and Methodology of Discovery: the Importance of Strategies

  • Sami Paavola
Article

Abstract

There are various ``classical'' argumentsagainst abduction as a logic of discovery,especially that (1) abduction is too weak amode of inference to be of any use, and (2) inbasic formulation of abduction the hypothesisis already presupposed to be known, so it isnot the way hypotheses are discovered in thefirst place. In this paper I argue, bybringing forth the idea of strategies,that these counter-arguments are weaker thanmay appear. The concept of strategiessuggests, inter alia, that many inferentialmoves are taken into account at the same time.This is especially important in abductivereasoning, which is basically a very weak modeof inference. The importance of strategicthinking can already be seen in Charles S.Peirce's early treatments of the topic, and N.R.Hanson's later writings on abductionalthough they did not use the concept of``strategies.'' On the whole, I am arguing thatthe focus should be more on methodologicalprocesses, and not only on validityconsiderations, which have dominated thediscussion about abduction.

abduction logic of discovery methodology strategies 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Achinstein, P.: 1970, Inference to Scientific Laws. In R.H. Stuwer (ed.), Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 5, 87–111.Google Scholar
  2. Achinstein, P.: 1971, Law and Explanation. An Essay in The Philosophy of Science. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  3. Achinstein, P.: 1987, Scientific Discovery andMaxwell's Kinetic Theory, Philosophy of Science 54: 409–434.Google Scholar
  4. Aliseda, A.: 1997, Seeking Explanations: Abduction in Logic, Philosophy of Science and Artificial Intelligence. Institute for Logic, Language, and Computation. Dissertation Series, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands.Google Scholar
  5. Aliseda, A.: 2001, A Place for Logic in ScientificMethodology:A Second Opportunity? A paper presented at the Model-Based Reasoning: Scientific Discovery, Technological Innovation, ValuesConference. Pavia, Italy, May 17–19.Google Scholar
  6. Anderson, D.R.: 1987, Creativity and the Philosophy of C.S. Peirce. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.Google Scholar
  7. Barlow, N. (ed.): 1958, The Autobiography of Charles Darwin, 1809–1882, with original omissions restored. St James's Place, London: Collins.Google Scholar
  8. Darwin, F.: 1892, Reminiscences of My Father's Everyday Life. In F. Darwin (ed.), Charles Darwin: His Life Told in an Autobiographical Chapter, and in a Selected Series of His Published Letters. London: John Murray, Albemarle Street 66–103.Google Scholar
  9. Eco, U. and T.A. Sebeok (eds.): 1988, The Sign of Three. Dupin, Holmes, Peirce. USA: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Fann, K.T.: 1970, Peirce's Theory of Abduction. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  11. Frankfurt, H.G.: 1958, Peirce's Account of Inquiry. The Journal of Philosophy55(14): 588–592.Google Scholar
  12. Gruber, H.E.: 1981, On the Relation Between 'Aha Experiences' and the Construction of Ideas, History of Science19: 41–59.Google Scholar
  13. Hanson, N.R.: 1961, Is There a Logic of Scientific Discovery. In H. Feigl and G. Maxwell (eds.), Current Issues in the Philosophy of Science. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc.Google Scholar
  14. Hanson, N.R.: 1965, Notes Toward a Logic of Discovery. In R.J. Bernstein (ed.), Perspectives on Peirce. New Haven/London: Yale University Press, 42–65.Google Scholar
  15. Hanson, N.R.: 1972, Patterns of Discovery. Cambridge: University Press, first printed 1958.Google Scholar
  16. Hintikka, J.: 1985, True and False Logic of Scientific Discovery, Communication and Cognition18(1/2): 3–14.Google Scholar
  17. Hintikka, J.: 1989, The Role of Logic in Argumentation,Monist72: 3–24.Google Scholar
  18. Hintikka, J.: 1998, What is Abduction? The Fundamental Problem of Contemporary Epistemology, Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society34(3): 503–533.Google Scholar
  19. Hintikka, J.: 1999, Is Logic the Key to All Good Reasoning? In J. Hintikka (ed.), Inquiry as Inquiry: A Logic of Scientific Discovery, Jaakko Hintikka Selected Papers, Volume 5. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  20. Hoffmann, M.: 1999, Problems with Peirce's Concept of Abduction, Foundations of Science4: 271–305.Google Scholar
  21. Jung, S.: 1996, The Logic of Discovery. An Interrogative Approach to Scientific Inquiry, American University Studies, Series V, Philosophy, Vol. 168. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  22. Kapitan, T.: 1992, Peirce and the Autonomy of Abductive Reasoning, Erkenntnis37: 1–26.Google Scholar
  23. Kuhn, T.S.: 1970, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 2nd edn., enlarged. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  24. Laudan, L.: 1980, Why Was the Logic of Discovery Abandoned. In T Nickles (ed.), Scientific Discovery, Logic, and Rationality. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company, 173–183.Google Scholar
  25. Liszka, J.J.: 1996, A General Introduction to the Semeiotic of Charles Sanders Peirce. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Magnani, L.: 1999. Model-Based Creative Abduction. In L. Magnani, N.J. Nersessian and P. Thagard (eds.), Model-Based Reasoning in Scientific Discovery. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.Google Scholar
  27. Nickles, T.: 1980a, Introductory Essay: Scientific Discovery and the Future of Philosophy of Science. In T. Nickles (ed.), Scientific Discovery, Logic, and Rationality. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  28. Nickles, T. (ed.): 1980b, Scientific Discovery, Logic, and Rationality. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  29. Nickles, T.: 1989, Heuristical Appraisal: A Proposal, Social Epistemology3(3): 175–188.Google Scholar
  30. Niiniluoto, I.: 1999a, Defending Abduction. Philosophy of Science66: S436–S451.Google Scholar
  31. Niiniluoto, I.: 1999b, Abduction and Geometrical Analysis. Notes on Charles S. Peirce and Edgar Allan Poe. In L. Magnani, N.J. Nersessian and P. Thagard (eds.), Model-Based Reasoning in Scientific Discovery. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.Google Scholar
  32. Peirce, C., S. (CP): 1931-1958, Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, vols. 1-6, C. Hartshorne and P. Weiss (eds.); vols. 7-8, A.W. Burks (ed.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Peirce, C., S. (HP): 1985, Historical Perspectives on Peirces Logic of Science. A History of Science, 2 vols., Carolyn Eisele (ed.). Berlin: Mouton Publishers.Google Scholar
  34. Peirce, C., S. (EP2): 1992-1998, The Essential Peirce. Selected Philosophical Writings, vol. 2 1893-1913, the Peirce Edition Project (ed.). Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Pera, M.: 1994, The Discourses of Science. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  36. Reichenbach, H.: 1938, Experience and Prediction. An Analysis of the Foundations and the Structure of Knowledge. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  37. Rescher, N.: 1995, Peirce on Abduction, Plausibility, and the Efficiency of Scientific Inquiry. In N. Rescher (ed.), Essays in the History of Philosophy. Avebury: Aldershot.Google Scholar
  38. Schon, D.: 1959, Comment on Mr. Hanson's "The Logic of Discovery", The Journal of Philosophy56(11): 500–503.Google Scholar
  39. Shelley, C.: 1996, Visual Abductive Reasoning in Archeology, Philosophy of Science63: 278–301.Google Scholar
  40. Sintonen, M.: 1996, Structuralism and the Interrogative Model of Inquiry. In W. Balzer and C.U. Moulines (eds.), Structuralist Theory of Science. Focal Issues, New Results. Berlin/New York: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  41. Thagard, P.: 2000, Coherence in Thought and Action. A Bradford Book. Cambridge,MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  42. Thagard, P. and C. Shelley: 1997, Abductive Reasoning: Logic, Visual Thinking, and Coherence. In M.L. Dalla Chiara, K. Doets, D. Mundici and J. van Bentham (eds.), Logic and Scientific Methods. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 413–427, on-line: http://cogsci.uwaterloo.ca/Articles/Pages/%7FAbductive.html.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sami Paavola

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations