Advertisement

Familial Cancer

, Volume 3, Issue 2, pp 85–91 | Cite as

Prognosis in DNA Mismatch Repair Deficient Colorectal Cancer: are all MSI Tumours Equivalent?

  • A. J. Clark
  • R. Barnetson
  • S. M. Farrington
  • M. G. Dunlop
Article

Abstract

Microsatellite instability (MSI) in colorectal tumours is the hallmark of defective DNA mismatch repair (MMR) and high level MSI can be detected in up to 15% of incident colorectal cancers. MSI in sporadic colorectal tumours is primarily due to epigenetic silencing of MLH1 while MSI is almost universal in tumours from HNPCC family members due to germline MMR gene mutation with loss or mutational inactivation of the second copy as a somatic event. There is evidence that tumour MSI is associated with a better outcome than the generality of large bowel malignancy. However, although MSI occurs in both sporadic colorectal cancer and in tumours arising in patients with germline MMR gene mutations, cancer survival should not be considered to be equivalent for these two groups with MSI tumours simply because both exhibit similarities in molecular phenotype. Here, we review the evidence on prognosis in patients with sporadic MSI tumours compared to those who have inherited a germline DNA MMR repair gene defect. In addition, we explore whether there are variables that afford opportunity to distinguish three groups on the basis of MSI status, namely: sporadic MSI tumours; MSI tumours in carriers of germline MMR gene defects; microsatellite stable (MSS) tumours. Differences in prognosis between these three groups is important because it underpins the rationale for surveillance and early identification of tumours in MMR gene carriers, as well as refining understanding of the influence of MSI on cancer progression. Furthermore, we discuss the effect of MSI on the effectiveness of chemotherapy regimens.

colorectal cancer DNA mismatch repair genetics microsatellite instability prognosis 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Halford S, Sasieni P, Rowan A et al. Low-level microsatellite instability occurs in most colorectal cancers and is a nonrandomly distributed quantitative trait. Cancer Res 2002; 62: 53–7.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Laiho P, Launonen V, Lahermo P et al. Low-level microsatellite instability in most colorectal carcinomas. Cancer Res 2002; 62: 1166–70.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bubb VJ, Curtis LJ, Cunningham C et al. Microsatellite instability and the role of hMSH2 in sporadic colorectalcancer. Oncogene 1996;%20; 12: 2641–9.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Forster S, Sattler HP, Hack M et al. Microsatellite instability in sporadic carcinomas of the proximal colon:association with diploid DNA content,negative protein expression of p53,and distinct histomorphologic features. Surgery 1998; 123: 8–13.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gryfe R, Kim H, Hsieh ET et al. Tumor microsatellite instability and clinical outcome in young patients with colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 2000; 342: 69–77.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Halling KC, French AJ, McDonnell SK et al. Microsatellite instability and 8p allelic imbalance in stage B2 and C colorectal cancers. J Natl Cancer Inst 1999; 91: 1295–303.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ionov Y, Peinado MA, Malkhosyan S et al. Ubiquitous somatic mutations in simple repeated sequences reveal a new mechanism for colonic carcinogenesis. Nature 1993; 363: 558–61.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kim H, Jen J, Vogelstein B, Hamilton SR. Clinical and pathological characteristics of sporadic colorectal carcinomas with DNA replication errors in microsatellite sequences. Am J Pathol 1994; 145: 148–56.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lothe RA, Peltomaki P, Meling GI et al. Genomic instability in colorectal cancer:relationship to clinicopathological variables and family history. Cancer Res 1993; 53: 5849–52.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lukish JR, Muro K, DeNobile J et al. Prognostic significance of DNA replication errors in young patients with colorectal cancer. Ann Surg 1998; 227: 51–6.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Thibodeau SN, Bren G, Schaid D. Microsatellite instability in cancer of the proximal colon. Science 1993; 260: 816–9.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wright CM, Dent OF, Barker M et al. Prognostic significance of extensive microsatellite instability in sporadic clinicopathological stage C colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 2000; 87: 1197–202.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Curran B, Lenehan K, Mulcahy H et al. Replication error phenotype,clinicopathological variables,and patient outcome in Dukes 'Bstage II (T3,N0,M0)colorectal cancer. Gut 2000; 46: 200–4.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Feeley KM, Fullard JF, Heneghan MA et al. Microsatellite instability in sporadic colorectal carcinoma is not an indicator of prognosis. J Pathol 1999; 188: 7–14.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Johannsdottir JT, Bergthorsson JT, Gretarsdottir S et al. Replication error in colorectal carcinoma:association with loss of heterozygosity at mismatch repair loci and clinicopathological variables. Anticancer Res 1999; 19: 1821–6.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ko JM, Cheung MH, Kwan MW et al. Genomic instability and alterations in Apc,Mcc and Dcc in Hong Kong patients with colorectal carcinoma. tiInt J Cancer} 1999; %20; vn84}: 404–9.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Messerini L, Ciantelli M, Baglioni S et al. Prognostic significance of microsatellite instability in sporadic mucinous colorectal cancers. Hum Pathol 1999; 30: 629–34.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Salahshor S, Kressner U, Fischer H et al. Microsatellite instability in sporadic colorectal cancer is not an independent prognostic factor. Br J Cancer 1999; 81: 190–3.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Boland CR, Thibodeau SN, Hamilton SR et al. A National Cancer Institute Workshop on Microsatellite Instability for cancer detection and familial predisposition:development of international criteria for the determination of microsatellite instability in colorectal cancer. Cancer Res 1998; 58: 5248–57.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Aaltonen LA, Salovaara R, Kristo P et al. Incidence of hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer and the feasibility of molecular screening for the disease. N Engl J Med 1998; 338: 1481–7.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Liu B, Farrington SM, Petersen GM et al. Genetic instability occurs in the majority of young patients with colorectal cancer. Nat Med 1995; 1: 348–52.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Cunningham JM, Christensen ER, Tester DJ et al. Hypermethylation of the hMLH1 promoter in colon cancer with microsatellite instability. Cancer Res 1998; 58: 3455–60.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Herman JG, Umar A, Polyak K et al. Incidence and functional consequences of hMLH1 promoter hypermethylation in colorectal carcinoma. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1998; 95: 6870–5.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kuismanen SA, Holmberg MT, Salovaara R et al. Epigenetic phenotypes distinguish microsatellite-stable and-unstable colorectal cancers. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1999; 96: 12661–6.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Veigl ML, Kasturi L, Olechnowicz J et al. Biallelic inactivation of hMLH1 by epigenetic gene silencing,a novel mechanism causing human MSI cancers. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1998; 95: 8698–702.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Farrington SM, Lin-Goerke J, Ling J et al. Systematic analysis of hMSH2 and hMLH1 in young colon cancer patients and controls. Am J Hum Genet 1998; 63: 749–59.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Farrington SM, McKinley AJ, Carothers AD et al. Evidence for an age-related influence of microsatellite instability on colorectal cancer survival. Int J Cancer 2002;%20; 98: 844–50.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Liu B, Parsons R, Papadopoulos N et al. Analysis of mismatch repair genes in hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer patients. Nat Med 1996; 2: 169–74.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Aarnio M, Mustonen H, Mecklin JP, Jarvinen HJ. Prognosis of colorectal cancer varies in different high-risk conditions. Ann Med 1998; 30: 75–80.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Lynch HT, Smyrk T. Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (Lynch syndrome).An updated review. Cancer 1996; 78: 1149–67.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Sankila R, Aaltonen LA, Jarvinen HJ, Mecklin JP. Better survival rates in patients with MLH1-associated hereditary colorectal cancer. Gastroenterology 1996; 110: 682–7.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Lin KM, Shashidharan M, Ternent CA et al. Colorectal and extracolonic cancer variations in MLH1/MSH2 hereditary nonpo-lyposis colorectal cancer kindreds and the general population. Dis Colon Rectum 1998; 41: 428–33.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Jarvinen HJ, Aarnio M, Mustonen H et al. Controlled 15-year trial on screening for colorectal cancer in families with hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer. Gastroenterology 2000; 118: 829–34.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Bertario L, Russo A, Sala P et al. Survival of patients with hereditary colorectal cancer:comparison of HNPCC and colorec-tal cancer in FAP patients with sporadic colorectal cancer. Int J Cancer 1999; 80: 183–7.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Kee F, Collins BJ, Patterson CC. Prognosis in familial non-polyposis colorectal cancer. Gut 1991; 32: 513–6.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Slattery ML, Kerber RA. The impact of family history of colon cancer on survival after diagnosis with colon cancer. Int J Epidemiol 1995; 24: 888–96.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Bignami M, Casorelli I, Karran P. Mismatch repair and response to DNA-damaging antitumour therapies. Eur J Cancer 2003; 39: 2142–9.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Karran P, Hampson R. Genomic instability and tolerance to alkylating agents. Cancer Surv 1996; 28: 69–85.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Carethers JM, Chauhan DP, Fink D et al. Mismatch repair pro ciency and in vitro response to 5-.uorouracil. Gastroenterology 1999; 117: 123–31.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Kat A, Thilly WG, Fang WH et al. An alkylation-tolerant, mutator human cell line is deficient in strand-specific mismatch repair. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1993; 90: 6424–8.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Griffin S, Branch P, Xu YZ, Karran P. DNA mismatch binding and incision at modified guanine bases by extracts of mammalian cells:implications for tolerance to DNA methylation damage. Biochemistry 1994; 33: 4787–93.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Aebi S, Kurdi-Haidar B, Gordon R et al. Loss of DNA mismatch repair in acquired resistance to cisplatin. Cancer Res 1996; 56: 3087–90.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Fallik D, Borrini F, Boige V et al. Microsatellite instability is a predictive factor of the tumor response to irinotecan in patients with advanced colorectal cancer. Cancer Res 2003; 63: 5738–44.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Peters GJ, van Groeningen CJ, van der Wilt CL et al. Time course of inhibition of thymidylate synthase in patients treated with fluorouracil and leucovorin. Semin Oncol 1992; 19: 26–35.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    van Laar JA, Rustum YM, Ackland SP et al. Comparison of 5-fluoro-2 '-deoxyuridine with 5-fluorouracil and their role in the treatment of colorectal cancer. Eur J Cancer 1998; 34: 296–306.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Aebi S, FinkD, Gordon R et al. Resistanceto cytotoxic drugsin DNA mismatch repair-deficient cells. Clin Cancer Res 1997; 3: 1763–7.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Meyers M, Wagner MW, Hwang HS et al. Role of the hMLH1 DNA mismatch repair protein in fluoropyrimidine-mediated cell death and cell cycle responses. Cancer Res 2001; 61: 5193–201.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Pocard M, Bras-Goncalves R, Hamelin R et al. Response to 5-fluorouracil of orthotopically xenografted human colon cancers with a microsatellite instability:influence of P53 status. Anticancer Res 2000; 20: 85–90.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Benhattar J, Cerottini JP, Saraga E et al.p53 mutations as a possible predictor of response to chemotherapy in metastatic colorectal carcinomas. Int J Cancer 1996; 69: 190–2.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Efficacy of adjuvant fluorouracil and folinic acid in colon cancer. International Multicentre Pooled Analysis of Colon Cancer Trials (IMPACT)investigators. Lancet 1995; 345: 939–44.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Rosty C, Chazal M, Etienne MC et al. Determination of micro-satellite instability,p53 and K-RAS mutations in hepatic metasta-ses from patients with colorectal cancer:relationship with response to 5-.uorouracil and survival. Int J Cancer 2001;%20; 95: 162–7.Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Liang JT, Huang KC, Lai HS et al. High-frequency microsatellite instability predicts better chemosensitivity to high-dose 5-fluorouracil plus leucovorin chemotherapy for stage IV sporadic colo-rectal cancer after palliative bowel resection. Int J Cancer 2002; %20; 101: 519–25.Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Elsaleh H, Joseph D, Grieu F et al. Association of tumour site and sex with survival bene t from adjuvant chemotherapy in colorectal cancer. Lancet 2000;%20; 355: 1745–50.Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Hemminki A, Mecklin JP, Jarvinen H et al. Microsatellite instability is a favorable prognostic indicator in patients with colorectal cancer receiving chemotherapy. Gastroenterology 2000; 119: 921–8.Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Watanabe T, Wu TT, Catalano PJ et al. Molecular predictors of survival after adjuvant chemotherapy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 2001;%19; 344: 1196–206.Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Barratt PL, Seymour MT, Stenning SP et al. DNA markers predicting bene t from adjuvant fluorouracil in patients with colon cancer:a molecular study. Lancet 2002; 360: 1381–91.Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Ribic CM, Sargent DJ, Moore MJ et al. Tumor microsatellite-instability status as a predictor of benefit from fluorouracil-based adjuvant chemotherapy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 2003; 349: 247–57.Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Carethers JM, Smith EJ, Behling CA et al. Use of 5-fluorouracil and survival in patients with microsatellite-unstable colorectal cancer. Gastroenterology 2004; 126: 394–401.Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Iacopetta B, Elsaleh H, Zeps N. Microsatellite instability in colon cancer. N Engl J Med 2003; 349: 1774–6.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. J. Clark
    • 1
  • R. Barnetson
    • 1
  • S. M. Farrington
    • 1
  • M. G. Dunlop
    • 1
  1. 1.Colon Cancer Genetics Group, Academic Coloproctology, Division of OncologyUniversity of Edinburgh, Western General HospitalEdinburghUK

Personalised recommendations