Evolutionary Ecology

, Volume 18, Issue 2, pp 113–120 | Cite as

Has inbreeding depression led to avoidance of sib mating in the Glanville fritillary butterfly (Melitaea cinxia)?

Article

Abstract

Previous work on the Glanville fritillary butterfly (Melitaea cinxia) shows substantial inbreeding depression in both of our two study regions, Finland and southern France. The influence of inbreeding depression on population dynamics should depend on the strength of inbreeding avoidance. We conducted mate choice experiments to ascertain whether and to what extent butterflies avoid mating with their sibs. Experiments with similar design were done in the laboratory with Finnish butterflies and in the field with French butterflies. Each female was given a choice of mates with equal opportunity to mate with a sib or with a non-sib. In neither experiment was there a trend towards avoidance of sib mating. 95% confidence intervals for the proportion of non-sib matings were 12–62% in the laboratory experiment and 28–69% in the field experiment. Any preference for non-sibs must be slight, and can provisionally be ignored in modelling the dynamics of M. cinxia populations.

inbreeding avoidance inbreeding depression mate choice Melitaea cinxia metapopulation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ball, S.J., Adams, M., Possingham, H.P. and Keller, M.A. (2000) The genetic contribution of single male immigrants to small, inbred populations: a laboratory study using Drosophila melanogaster. Heredity 84, 677–684.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bateson, P. (1978) Sexual imprinting and optimal outbreeding. Nature 273, 659–660.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bateson, P. (1982) Preferences for cousins in Japanese quail. Nature 295, 236–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cockburn, A., Scott, M.P. and Scotts, D.J. (1985) Inbreeding avoidance and male-biased natal dispersal in Antechinus spp. (Marsupialia: Dasyuridae). Anim. Behav. 33, 908–915.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Colegrave, N. and Ruxton, G.D. (2003) Confidence intervals are a more useful complement to nonsignificant tests than are power calculations. Behav. Ecol. 14, 446–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Crawley, M.J. (1997) Sex. In M.J. Crawley (ed.) Plant Ecology. 2nd edn. Blackwell Science, pp. 156–213.Google Scholar
  7. Dobson, F.S., Chesser, R.K., Hoogland, J.L., Sugg, D.W. and Foltz, D.W. (1997) Do black-tailed prairie dogs minimize inbreeding? Evolution 51, 970–978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Futuyma, D.J. (1997) Evolutionary Biology. 3rd edn. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachu-setts.Google Scholar
  9. Gibbs, H.L. and Grant, P.R. (1989) Inbreeding in Darwin's Medium Ground Finches (Geospiza fortis). Evolution 43, 1273–1284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Haikola, S., Fortelius, W., O'Hara, R.B., Kuussaari,M., Wahlberg, N., Saccheri, I.J., Singer, M.C. and Hanski, I. (2001) Inbreeding depression and the maintenance of genetic load in Melitaea cinxia metapopulations. Conserv. Genet. 2, 325–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hanski, I. (1999) Metapopulation Ecology. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  12. Hanski, I., Pakkala, T., Kuussaari, M. and Lei, G. (1995a) Metapopulation persistence of an endangered butterfly in a fragmented landscape. Oikos 72, 21–28.Google Scholar
  13. Hanski, I., Pöyry, J., Pakkala, T. and Kuussaari, M. (1995b) Multiple equilibria in metapopulation dynamics. Nature 377, 618–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hanski, I. and Singer, M.C. (2001) Extinction-colonization dynamics and host-plant choice in butterfly metapopulations. Am. Nat. 158, 341–353.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Hedrick, P.W. and Kalinowski, S.T. (2000) Inbreeding depression in conservation biology. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 31, 139–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hoogland, J.L. (1982) Prairie dogs avoid extreme inbreeding. Science 215, 1639–1641.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Ingvarsson, P.K. (2001) Restoration of genetic variation lost — the genetic rescue hypothesis. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16, 62–63.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Joron, M. and Brakefield, P.M. (2003) Captivity masks inbreeding effects on male mating success in butterflies. Nature 424, 191–194.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Keane, B. (1990) The effect of relatedness on reproductive success and mate choice in the white-footed mouse, Peromyscus leucopus. Anim. Behav. 39, 264–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Keane, B., Creel, S.R. and Waser, P.M. (1996) No evidence of inbreeding avoidance or inbreeding depression in a social carnivore. Behav. Ecol. 7, 480–489.Google Scholar
  21. Keller, L. and Passera, L. (1993) Incest avoidance, fluctuating asymmetry, and the consequences of inbreeding in Iridomyrmex humilis, an ant with multiple queen colonies. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 33, 191–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Koenig, W.D. and Pitelka, F.A. (1979) Relatedness and inbreeding avoidance: counterploys in the communally nesting acorn woodpecker. Science 206, 1103–1105.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Krackow, S. and Matuschak, B. (1991) Mate choice for non-siblings in wild house mice: evidence from a choice test and a reproductive test. Ethology 88, 99–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kuussaari, M. (1998) Biology of the Glanville fritillary butterfly (Melitaea cinxia). PhD thesis, University of Helsinki, Finland.Google Scholar
  25. Kuussaari, M., Nieminen, M. and Hanski, I. (1996) An experimental study of migration in the Glanville fritillary butterfly Melitaea cinxia. J. Anim. Ecol. 65, 791–801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kuussaari, M., Saccheri, I., Camara, M. and Hanski, I. (1998) Allee effect and population dynamics in the Glanville fritillary butterfly. Oikos 82, 384–392.Google Scholar
  27. Markow, T.A. (1997) Assortative fertilization in Drosophila. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94, 7756–7760.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Nieminen, M., Singer, M.C., Fortelius, W., Schöps, K. and Hanski, I (2001) Experimental confirmation that inbreeding depression increases extinction risk in butterfly populations. Am. Nat. 157, 237–244.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Olsson, M., Shine, R., Madsen, T., Gullberg, A. and Tegelström, H. (1996) Sperm selection by females. Nature 383, 585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Palo, J., Varvio, S.-L., Hanski, I. and Väinölä, R. (1995) Developing microsatellite markers for insect population structure: complex variation in a checkerspot butterfly. Hereditas 123, 295–300.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Peacock, M.M. and Smith, A.T. (1997) Nonrandom mating in pikas Ochotona princeps: evidence for inbreeding between individuals of intermediate relatedness. Mol. Ecol. 6, 801–811.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Richards, C.M. (2000) Inbreeding depression and genetic rescue in a plant metapopulation. Am. Nat. 155, 383–394.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Saccheri, I., Kuussaari, M., Kankare, M., Vikman, P., Fortelius, W. and Hanski, I. (1998) Inbreeding and extinction in a butterfly metapopulation. Nature 392, 491–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Simmons, L.W. (1991) Female choice and the relatedness of mates in the field cricket, Gryllus bimaculatus. Anim. Behav. 41, 493–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Thrall, P.H., Richards, C.M., McCauley, D.E. and Antonovics, J. (1998) Metapopulation collapse: the consequences of limited gene-flow in spatially structured populations. In J. Bascompte and R.V. Solé (eds.) Modeling spatiotemporal dynamics in ecology. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 83–104.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Tvärminne Zoological StationHankoFinland
  2. 2.Department of Ecology and Systematics, Division of Population BiologyUniversity of HelsinkiFinland
  3. 3.Institut des Sciences de l'EvolutionUniversité de Montpellier 2MontpellierFrance
  4. 4.Section of Integrative BiologyUniversity of TexasAustinUSA
  5. 5.Institut des Sciences de l'EvolutionUniversité de Montpellier 2MontpellierFrance

Personalised recommendations