A Woman's Choice? — On Women, Assisted Reproduction and Social Coercion
- 128 Downloads
This paper critically discusses an argument that is sometimes pressed into service in the ethical debate about the use of assisted reproduction. The argument runs roughly as follows: we should prevent women from using assisted reproduction techniques, because women who want to use the technology have been socially coerced into desiring children - and indeed have thereby been harmed by the patriarchal society in which they live. I call this the argument from coercion.
Having clarified this argument, I conclude that although it addresses important issues, it is highly problematic for the following reasons. First, if women are being coerced to desire to use AR, we should eradicate the coercive elements in pro-natalist ideology, not access to AR. Second, the argument seems to have the absurd implication that we should prevent all woman, whether fertile or not, to try to have children. Third, it seems probable that women's welfare will be greater if we let well informed and decision-competent women decide for themselves whether they want to use AR.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Boetzkes, E., Equality, Autonomy and Feminist Bioethics, in A. Donchin and L.M. Purdy (eds.), Embodying Bioethics, Recent Feminist Advances. Rowman and Littlefield Publishers, Inc., 1999, pp. 121–139.Google Scholar
- Brazier, M., Reproductive Rights: Feminism or Patriarchy? in J. Harris and S. Holm (eds.), The Future of Human Reproduction. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998, pp. 66–76.Google Scholar
- Brock, D.W., Life and Death. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
- Donchin, A., Feminist Critiques of New Fertility Technologies; Implications for Social Policy. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 21 (1996), pp. 475–498.Google Scholar
- Corea, G., The Mother Machine: Reproductive Technologies from Artificial Insemination to Artificial Wombs. The Women's Press, 1988.Google Scholar
- Harris, J., Rights and Reproductive Choice, in J. Harris and S. Holm (eds.), The Future of Human Reproduction. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998, pp. 5–37.Google Scholar
- Koch, L., IVF-an Irrational Choice?, Issues in Reproductive and Genetic Engineering 3(3), (1990), pp. 235–242.Google Scholar
- Lang, S.S., Women Without Children: The Reasons, the Rewards, the Regrets. New York: Pharos Books, 1991.Google Scholar
- Nozick, R., Coercion, in P. Laslett, W.G. Runciman and Q. Skinner (eds.), Philosophy, Politics and Society, 4th Series. Basil Blackwell, Oxford, 1972, pp. 101–135.Google Scholar
- Purdy, L.M., What Can Progress in Reproductive Technology Mean for Women, The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 21 (1996), pp. 499–514.Google Scholar
- Purdy, L.M., Assisted Reproduction, in P. Singer (ed.), Companion to Bioethics. Oxford: Blackwell, 1998, pp. 163–172.Google Scholar
- Robertson J.A., Children of Choice: Freedom and The New Reproductive Technology. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
- Rowland, R., Living Laboratories: Women and Reproductive Technologies. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
- Sen, A., Well-being, Agency and Freedom, Journal of Philosophy 82(4) (1985), pp. 169–221.Google Scholar
- Singer, P., New Assisted Reproductive Technology, in P. Singer and H. Kuhse (eds.), Bioethics, An Anthology. Blackwell, Oxford, 1999, pp. 99–102.Google Scholar
- Sumner, L.W., Welfare, Happiness & Ethics. Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1996.Google Scholar
- Warren M.A., Sex Selection. Individual Choice or Cultural Coercion?, in H. Kuhse and P. Singer (eds.), Bioethics: An Anthology. Blackwell Publishers Ltd., Oxford, 1999, pp. 137–142.Google Scholar