Ethics and Information Technology

, Volume 5, Issue 4, pp 191–198

Real wrongs in virtual communities

  • Thomas M. Powers
Article

Abstract

Beginning with the well-knowncyber-rape in LambdaMOO, I argue that it ispossible to have real moral wrongs in virtualcommunities. I then generalize the account toshow how it applies to interactions in gamingand discussion communities. My account issupported by a view of moral realism thatacknowledges entities like intentions andcausal properties of actions. Austin's speechact theory is used to show that real people canact in virtual communities in ways that bothestablish practices and moral expectations, andwarrant strong identifications betweenthemselves and their online identities. Rawls'conception of a social practice is used toanalyze the nature of the wrong and thestage-setting aspect of engaging in a practice.

Austin LambdaMOO moral realism Rawls speech act theory virtual communities 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. J.L. Austin. How to Do Things With Words. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1962.Google Scholar
  2. A. Cicognani. On the Linguistic Nature of Cyberspace and Virtual Communities. Virtual Reality: Research, Development and Application, vol. 3, pp. 16-24. Springer-Verlag, London, 1998, also available at http://www.arch.su.edu.au/anna/papers/language.pdf, at 22.01.03Google Scholar
  3. A. Cicognani and M.L. Maher. Design Speech Acts. 'How to Do Things With Words' in Virtual Communities. Proceedings of CAAD Futures 1997. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 1997.Google Scholar
  4. Julian A. Dibbell. A Rape in Cyberspace: How an Evil Clown, a Haitian Trickster Spirit, Two Wizards, and a Cast of Dozens Turned a Database in to a Society. The Village Voice: 36-42, December 23, 1993, also available at http://www.juliandibbell.com/texts/bungle_vv.html, at 24.01.03.Google Scholar
  5. Nelson Goodman. Ways of Worldmaking. Hackett Publishing, Indianapolis, 1978.Google Scholar
  6. C. Huff, K. Miller and D.G. Johnson. Virtual Harms and Real Responsibility: a Rape in Cyberspace. IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, 23(2), 2003.Google Scholar
  7. John Rawls. Two Concepts of Rules. Philosophical Review, 64(1): 3-32, 1955.Google Scholar
  8. Georg Simmel. How Is Society Possible? In Donald N. Levine, editor, Georg Simmel: On Individuality and Social Forms. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1971 (original work published in 1908).Google Scholar
  9. Barry Smith. Towards a History of Speech Act Theory. In A. Burkhardt, editor, Speech Acts, Meanings and Intentions. Critical Approaches to the Philosophy of John R. Searle. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin/New York, 1990.Google Scholar
  10. J.R. Suler and W. Phillips. The Bad Boys of Cyberspace: Deviant Behavior in Multimedia Chat Communities. Cyber-Psychology and Behavior, 1: 275-294, 1998.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Thomas M. Powers

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations