Advertisement

Journal of Elasticity

, Volume 70, Issue 1–3, pp 101–109 | Cite as

Geometrically-based Consequences of Internal Constraints

  • Donald E. Carlson
  • Eliot Fried
  • Daniel A. Tortorelli
Article

Abstract

When a body is subject to simple internal constraints, the deformation gradient must belong to a certain manifold. This is in contrast to the situation in the unconstrained case, where the deformation gradient is an element of the open subset of second-order tensors with positive determinant. Commonly, following Truesdell and Noll [1], modern treatments of constrained theories start with an a priori additive decomposition of the stress into reactive and active components with the reactive component assumed to be powerless in all motions that satisfy the constraints and the active component given by a constitutive equation. Here, we obtain this same decomposition automatically by making a purely geometrical and general direct sum decomposition of the space of all second-order tensors in terms of the normal and tangent spaces of the constraint manifold. As an example, our approach is used to recover the familiar theory of constrained hyperelasticity.

continuum mechanics internal constraints constitutive theory hyperelasticity 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    C. Truesdell and W. Noll, The non-linear field theories of mechanics. In: S. Flügge (ed.), Handbuch der Physik, Vol. III/3. Springer-Verlag, Berlin (1965).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    D.E. Carlson and D.A. Tortorelli, On hyperelasticity with internal constraints. J. Elasticity 42 (1996) 91–98.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    J. Casey and S. Krishnaswamy, On constrained thermoelastic materials. In: R.C. Batra and M.F. Beatty (eds), Contemporary Research in the Mechanics and Mathematics of Materials. CIMNE, Barcelona (1996) pp. 359–371.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    J. Casey and S. Krishnaswamy, A characterization of internally constrained thermoelastic materials. Mathematics and Mechanics of Solids 3 (1998) 71–89.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    J. Casey, A treatment of internally constrained materials. Trans. ASME J. Appl.Mech. 62 (1995) 542–544.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    J.L. Ericksen and R.S. Rivlin, Large elastic deformations of homogeneous anisotropic materials. J. Rational Mech. Anal. 3 (1954) 281–301.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    O.M. O'Reilly and A.R. Srinivasa, On a decomposition of generalized constraint forces. Proc. Roy. Soc. London A 457 (2001) 1307–1313.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    D.R. Anderson, D.E. Carlson and E. Fried, A continuum-mechanical theory for nematic elastomers. J. Elasticity 56 (1999) 33–58.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    M.E. Gurtin, An Introduction to Continuum Mechanics. Academic Press, New York (1981).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    G. Green, On the laws of reflection and refraction of light at the common surface of two noncrystallized media. Trans. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 7 (1839) 245–269.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    G. Green, On the propagation of light in crystallized media. Trans. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 7 (1841) 113–120.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    B.D. Coleman and W. Noll, The thermodynamics of elastic materials with heat conduction and viscosity. Arch. Rational Mech. Anal. 13 (1963) 167–178.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Donald E. Carlson
    • 1
  • Eliot Fried
    • 1
    • 2
  • Daniel A. Tortorelli
    • 1
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Theoretical and Applied MechanicsUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignUrbanaUSA
  2. 2.Department of Mechanical EngineeringWashington University in St. LouisSt. LouisUSA
  3. 3.Department of Mechanical and Industrial EngineeringUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignUrbanaUSA

Personalised recommendations