Advertisement

European Journal of Law and Economics

, Volume 18, Issue 2, pp 223–237 | Cite as

‘Full’ Compensation Criteria: An Enquiry into Relative Merits

  • Ram Singh
Article

Abstract

The principle of ‘full’ compensation is said to restore the victim of an accident to the position he was in before the tort. The conventional ‘pre-tort position’ of the victim is taken to be the one in which he bears no accident losses at all. Therefore, a negligent injurer is required to compensate his victim fully. In an interesting paper in this journal, Van Wijck and Winters (2001) have reinterpreted the ‘pre-tort position’ of the victim, and proposed an ‘alternative’ specification of liability for the purpose of compensation. We study the relative merits of the two compensation criteria. We show that while the alternative compensation criterion is indeed insightful from economic as well as legal point of view, at the same time it suffers from some serious limitations.

tort liability rules alternative compensation criterion non-identical individuals court errors economic efficiency 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baird, D. G., Gertner, R. H., & Picker, R. C. (1994). Game Theory and the Law, London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Carney, W. J. (2000). “Limited Liability' in Encyclopedia of Law and Economics.” B. Bouckaert & G. De Geest (eds.), Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 659–691.Google Scholar
  3. Cooter, R. D. & Ulen, T. S. (1998). Law and Economics, 2nd edn., New York: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  4. Emons, W. (1990). “Efficient Liability Rules for an Economy with Non-Identical Individuals.” Journal of Public Economics. 42, 89–104.Google Scholar
  5. Emons, W. & Sobel, J. (1991). “On the Effectiveness of Liability Rules When Agents are Not identical.” Review of Economic Studies. 58, 375–390.Google Scholar
  6. Endres, A & Ludeke, A. (1998). “Limited Liability and Imperfect Information-On the Existence of Safety Equilibria Under Products Liability Law.” European Journal of Law and Economics.5,153–165.Google Scholar
  7. Grady, M. F. (1988). “Discontinuities and Information Burdens: Review of the Economic Structure or Tort Law by William M. Landes and Richard A. Posner.” George Washington Law Review. 56, 658–678.Google Scholar
  8. Halpern, P. (1998). “Limited and Extended Liability Regimes.” In The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics and The Law.Macmillan Reference Limited, pp. 581–91.Google Scholar
  9. Hart, H. L. A. & Honore, T. (1985). Causation in the Law. 2nd edn., Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Honore, T. (1997). “Necessary and Sufficient Condition in Tort Law.” In D. G. Owen, (ed.), Philosophical Foun-dations of Tort Law. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  11. Kahan, M. (1989). “Causation and Incentives to Take Care under the Negligence Rule.” Journal of Legal Studies. 18, 427–447.Google Scholar
  12. Kaplow, L. (1998). “Accuracy in Adjudication.” In The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economicsand The Law. Macmillan Reference Limited, pp. 1–7.Google Scholar
  13. Kaplow, L. & Shavell, S. (1999). “Economic Analysis of Law.” NBER Working Paper. No. 6960.Google Scholar
  14. Keeton, W. Page (ed.) (1984). Prosser and Keeton on the Law of Torts, St. Paul, Minn: West Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  15. Maresinis, B. S. & Deakin, S. F. (1994). Tort Law, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  16. Miceli, T. J. (1997). Economics of the Law: Torts, Contracts, Property, Litigation, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Shavell, S. (1987). Economic Analysis of Accident Law, Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Singh, R. (2003). “Efficiency of 'Simple' Liability Rules WhenCourts Make Erroneous Estimation of the Damage,” European Journal of Law and Economics. 16, 39–58.Google Scholar
  19. Singh, R. (2002). “Causation-consistent' Liability, Economic Efficiency and the Law of Torts.” CDE, Delhi School of Economics Working Paper. Series No 107.Google Scholar
  20. Van Wijck, P. V. & Winters, J. K. (2001). “The Principle of Full Compensation in Tort Law.” European Journal of Law and Economics. 11(3), 319–332.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ram Singh
    • 1
  1. 1.Centre for the Study of Law and GovernanceJawaharlal Nehru UniversityNew Delhi-India

Personalised recommendations