Environmental and Ecological Statistics

, Volume 11, Issue 2, pp 113–138 | Cite as

Multiscale advanced raster map analysis system: Definition, design and development

  • G.P. Patil
  • J. Balbus
  • G. Biging
  • J. JaJa
  • W. L. Myers
  • C. Taillie

Abstract

This paper brings together a multidisciplinary initiative to develop advanced statistical and computational techniques for analyzing, assessing, and extracting information from raster maps. This information will provide a rigorous foundation to address a wide range of applications including disease mapping, emerging infectious diseases, landscape ecological assessment, land cover trends and change detection, watershed assessment, and map accuracy assessment. It will develop an advanced map analysis system that integrates these techniques with an advanced visualization toolbox, and use the system to conduct large case studies using rich sets of raster data, primarily from remotely sensed imagery. As a result, it will be possible to study and evaluate raster maps of societal, ecological, and environmental variables to facilitate quantitative characterization and comparative analysis of geospatial trends, patterns, and phenomena. In addition to environmental and ecological studies, these techniques and tools can be used for policy decisions at national, state, and local levels, crisis management, and protection of infrastructure. Geospatial data form the foundation of an information-based society. Remote sensing has been a vastly under-utilized resource involving a multi-million dollar investment at the national levels. Even when utilized, the credibility has been at stake, largely because of lack of tools that can assess, visualize, and communicate accuracy and reliability in timely manner and at desired confidence levels. Consider an imminent 21st century scenario: What message does a multi-categorical map have about the large landscape it represents? And at what scale, and at what level of detail? Does the spatial pattern of the map reveal any societal, ecological, environmental condition of the landscape? And therefore can it be an indicator of change? How do you automate the assessment of the spatial structure and behavior of change to discover critical areas, hot spots, and their corridors? Is the map accurate? How accurate is it? How do you assess the accuracy of the map? How do we evaluate a temporal change map for change detection? What are the implications of the kind and amount of change and accuracy on what matters, whether climate change, carbon emission, water resources, urban sprawl, biodiversity, indicator species, human health, or early warning? And with what confidence? The proposed research initiative is expected to find answers to these questions and a few more that involve multi-categorical raster maps based on remote sensing and other geospatial data. It includes the development of techniques for map modeling and analysis using Markov Random Fields, geospatial statistics, accuracy assessment and change detection, upper echelons of surfaces, advanced computational techniques for geospatial data mining, and advanced visualization techniques.

echelons and families of echelons surface topology and upper level sets geographic surveillance elevated cluster detection change detection and regional change patterns analysis multiscale assessment regional echelon partitions hotspots critical areas corridors outbreaks multicriteria rankings and fuzzy ranks posets Hasse diagrams and linear extensions elevated cluster prioritization environmental factor prioritization multicriteria comparisons and decisions multiscale landscape pattern metrics scaling domains multiscale fragmentation profiles eigen values as fractals modeling and simulation devices Markov random fields multivariate disjunctive indicator geostatistics and hierarchical Markov transition matrix models uncertainity analysis confidence statements statistical significance inferential geoinformatics userfriendly software system for multiscale map and surface analysis geospatial data management data mining data analysis visualization and communication MARMAP 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Agresti, A. (1996) Categorical Data Analysis, Wiley, New York, 1990.Google Scholar
  2. Aldous, D. (1987) On the Markov chain simulation method for uniform combinatorial distributions and simulated annealing. Probability in the Engineering and Informational Sciences, 1, 33-46.Google Scholar
  3. Azencott, R. (1989) Simulated annealing. Seminaire Bourbaki, No. 697. Asterique, 161–162, 223-37.Google Scholar
  4. Azencott, R. (ed.) (1992) Simulated Annealing, Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  5. Barone, P., Frigessi, A., and Piccioni, M. (1990) Stochastic Models, Statistical Methods, Algorithms in Image Analysis, Lecture Notes in Statistics, No. 74. Springer-Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
  6. Besag, J. (1974) Spatial interaction and the statistical analysis of lattice systems (with discussion). Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 36, 192-236.Google Scholar
  7. Biging, G.S., Colby, D.R., and Congalton, R.G. (1998) Chapter 15: Sampling systems for change detection accuracy assessment. In Remote Sensing Change Detection: Environmental Monitoring Methods and Applications, R.S. Lunnetta and C.D. Elvidge (eds), Ann Arbor Press, Chelsea, MI, pp. 281-308.Google Scholar
  8. Breidt, F.J. (1995a) Markov chain designs for one-per-stratum sampling. Survey Methodology, 21(1), 63-70.Google Scholar
  9. Breidt, F.J. (1995b) Markov chain designs for one-per-stratum spatial sampling. In Proceedings of the Section on Survey Research Methods, American Statistical Association, Washington, DC, pp. 356-61.Google Scholar
  10. Bremaud, P. (1999) Markov Chains: Gibbs Fields, Monte Carlo Simulation, and Queues, Springer, New York.Google Scholar
  11. Brightwell, G. and Winkler, P. (1991) Counting linear extensions. Order, 8, 225-42.Google Scholar
  12. CENR Integrating the Nation's Environmental Monitoring and Research Networks and Programs: A Proposed Framework. National Science and Technology Council, Committee on Environment and Natural Resources, Washington, DC, 1997.Google Scholar
  13. Christman, M.C. (2000) A review of quadrat-based sampling of rare, geographically clustered populations. J. Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics, 5(2), 168-201.Google Scholar
  14. Christman, M.C. (2003) Adaptive two-stage one-per-stratum sampling. Environmental and Ecological Statistics, 10, 43-60.Google Scholar
  15. Congalton, R.G. (1988) Using spatial autocorrelation analysis to explore errors in maps generated from remotely sensed data. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 54(5), 587-92.Google Scholar
  16. Congalton, R. (1991) A review of assessing the accuracy of classification of remotely sensed data. Remote Sensing of the Environment, 37, 35-45.Google Scholar
  17. Congalton, R.G. and Green, K. (1999) Assessing the Accuracy of Remotely Sensed Data: Principles and Practices, Lewis Publishers, Boco Raton, FL.Google Scholar
  18. Cressie, N.A.C. (1991) Statistics for Spatial Data, John Wiley & Sons, New York.Google Scholar
  19. Deutsch, C.V. and Journel, A.G. (1989) GSLIB: Geostatistical Software Library and User's Guide (second edition), Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  20. Di Battista, G., Eades, P., Tamassia, R., and Tollis, I.G. (1999) Graph Drawing: Algorithms for the Visualization of Graphs, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey.Google Scholar
  21. Dubois, D. and Prade, H. (1980) Fuzzy Sets and Systems: Theory and Applications, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  22. Dykes, J.A. (1997) Exploring spatial data representation with dynamic graphics. Computers and Geosciences, 23, 345-70.Google Scholar
  23. Ehlschlaeger, C.R., Shortridge, M., and Goodchild, M.F. (1997) Visualizing spatial data uncertainty using animation. Computers and Geosciences, 23(4), 387-96.Google Scholar
  24. Filar, J.A., Ross, N.P., and Wu, M.L. (1999) Environmental assessment based on multiple indicators. CEIS, U.S. EPA, Washington, DC, pp. 1-30.Google Scholar
  25. Finn, J.T. Study Proposal: Accuracy assessment of vegetation and biodiversity maps of southern New England. http://149.170.199.144/new_gis/NewEng/maine/accuracy.htm 6 pp.Google Scholar
  26. Fishburn, P.C. (1985) Interval Orders and Interval Graphs: A Study of Partially Ordered Sets, Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  27. Foody, G.M., Palubinskas, G., Lucas, R.M., Curran, P.J., and Honzak, M. (1996) Identifying terrestrial carbon sinks: Classification of succession stages in regenerating tropical forest from Landsat TM data. Remote Sens. Environ., 55, 205-16.Google Scholar
  28. Fuller, W.A. (1999) Environmental surveys over time. Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics, 4(4), 331-45.Google Scholar
  29. Gahegan, M.N. and O'Brien, D.L. (1997) A strategy and architecture for the visualization of complex geographical datasets. International Journal of Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence, 11(2), 239-61.Google Scholar
  30. Gahegan, M. (1998) Scatterplots and scenes: Visualization techniques for exploratory spatial analysis. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 22(1), 43-56.Google Scholar
  31. Geman, D. (1990) Random fields and inverse problems in imaging. Lecture Notes in Mathematics, No. 1427, Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 117-93.Google Scholar
  32. Geman, S. and Geman, D. (1984) Stochastic relaxation, Gibbs distribution, and the Bayesian restoration of images. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 6, 721-41.Google Scholar
  33. Gidas, B. (1995) Metropolis-type Monte Carlo simulation algorithms and simulated annealing. In Topics in Contemporary Probability and its Applications, J. Laurie Snell (ed.), pp. 159-233.Google Scholar
  34. Gimel'Farb, G.L. (1999) Image Textures and Gibbs Random Fields, Kluwer, Boston.Google Scholar
  35. Goldberg, D.E. (1989) Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization, and Machine Learning, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  36. Goovaerts, P. (1997) Geostatistics for Natural Resources Evaluation, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  37. Guyon, X. (1995) Random Fields on a Network: Modeling, Statistics, and Applications, Springer-Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
  38. Hargis, C.D., Bissonette, J.A., and David, J.L. (1998) The behavior of landscape metrics commonly used in the study of habitat fragmentation. Landscape Ecology, 13, 167-86.Google Scholar
  39. Johnson, G.D. (1999) Landscape Pattern Analysis for Assessing Ecosystem Condition: Development of a Multi-Resolution Method and Application to Watershed Delineated Landscapes in Pennsylvania, Ph.D. Thesis, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA.Google Scholar
  40. Johnson, G.D., Myers, W.L., Patil, G.P., and Taillie, C. (1999a) Multiresolution fragmentation profiles for assessing hierarchically structured landscape patterns. Ecological Modeling, 116, 293-301.Google Scholar
  41. Johnson, G.D., Myers, W.L., Patil, G.P., and Taillie, C. (1999b) Characterizing watershed-delineated landscapes in Pennsylvania using conditional entropy profiles. Landscape Ecology (under revision).Google Scholar
  42. Johnson, G.D., Myers, W.L., Patil, G.P., and Taillie, C. (2001) Fragmentation profiles for real and simulated landscapes. Environmental and Ecological Statistics, 8(1), 5-20.Google Scholar
  43. Johnson, G.D., Myers, W.L., Patil, G.P., and Walrath, D. (1998) Multiscale analysis of the spatial distribution of breeding bird species richness using the echelon approach. In Assessment of Biodiversity for Improved Forest Planning, P. Bachmann, M. Kohl, and R. Paivinen (eds), Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 135-50.Google Scholar
  44. Johnson, G.D. and Patil, G.P. (1998) Quantitative multiresolution characterizations of landscape patterns for assessing the status of ecosystem health in watershed management areas, Ecosystem Health, 4(3), 177-87.Google Scholar
  45. Kalton, G. and Anderson, D.W. (1986) Sampling rare populations. J. R. Statist. Soc. A., 149(1), 65-82.Google Scholar
  46. Karzanov, A. and Khachiyan, L. (1991) On the conductance of order Markov chains. Order, 8, 7-15.Google Scholar
  47. Kenwright, D., Banks, D. Bryson, S. Haimes, R., van Liere, R., and Uselton, S. (1999) Automation or interaction: What's best for big data? Proc. IEEE Visualization '99, San Francisco, CA.Google Scholar
  48. Khorram, S., Biging, G.S., Chrisman, N.R., Colby, D.R., Congalton, R.G., Dobson, J.E. Ferguson, R.L., Goodchild, M.F., Jensen, J.R., and Mace, T.H. (1999) Accuracy Assessment of Remote Sensing Derived Change Detection, ASPRS Monograph Series, American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Bethesda, MD, 64 pp.Google Scholar
  49. Khorram, S., Brockhaus, J.A., and Geraci, A.L. (1991) A regional assessment of land use/land cover types in Sicily with TM data. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 12(1), 69-78.Google Scholar
  50. Kulldorff, M. (1997) A spatial scan statistic. Communications in Statistics—Theory and Methods, 26(6), 148-96.Google Scholar
  51. Kulldorff, M. and Nagarwalla, N. (1994) Spatial disease clusters: Detection and inference. Statistics in Medicine, 13, 1-12.Google Scholar
  52. Kurihara, K., Myers, W.L., and Patil, G.P. (1999) The relationship of the population and land cover patterns in Tokyo area based on remote sensing data. Technical Report 99-1103, Center for Statistical Ecology and Environmental Statistics, Department of Statistics, Penn State University, University Park, PA.Google Scholar
  53. Kyriakidis, P.C. and Dungan, J.L. (2001) Assessing thematic classification accuracy and the impact of inaccurate spatial data on ecological model predictions. Environmental and Ecological Statistics, 8(4), 311-30.Google Scholar
  54. Lo, C.P. and Faber, B.J. (1997) Integration of Landsat thematic mapper and census data for quality of life assessment. Remote Sensing of Environmen, 62, 143-57.Google Scholar
  55. Lunetta, R.S. and Elvidge, C.D. (1998) Remote Sensing Change Detection: Environmental Monitoring Methods and Applications, Ann Arbor Press, Chelsea, MI.Google Scholar
  56. MacEachren, A.M., Wachowitz, M., Edsall, R., Haug, D., and Masters, R. (1999) Constructing knowledge from multivariate spatio-temporal data: Integrating geographical visualization with knowledge discovery in database methods. International Journal of Geographic Information Science, 13(4), 311-34.Google Scholar
  57. McGarigal, K. and Marks, B. (1995) FRAGSTATS: Spatial pattern analysis program for quantifying landscape structure. General Technical Report PNW-GTR-351. Portland, OR, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station.Google Scholar
  58. Metropolis, N., Rosenbluth, A.W., Rosenbluth, M.N., Teller, A.H., and Teller, E. (1953) Equations of state calculations by fast computing machines. Journal of Chemical Physics, 21, 1087-91.Google Scholar
  59. Mihalisin, T., Timlin, J., and Schwegler, J. (1991) Visualizing multivariate functions, data and distributions. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 19(13), pp. 28-35.Google Scholar
  60. Mitas, L., Brown, W.M., and Mirasova, H. (1997) Role of dynamic cartography in simulations of landscape processes based on multivariate fields. Computers and Geosciences, 23(4), 437-46.Google Scholar
  61. Moisen, G.G. and Edwards, T.C., Jr., (1999) Use of generalized linear models and digital data in a forest inventory of Northern Utah. Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics, 4(4), 372-90.Google Scholar
  62. Myers, D.E. (1982) Matrix formulation of co-kriging. Journal of the International Association for Mathematical Geology, 14, 249-57.Google Scholar
  63. Myers, W.L., Patil, G.P., and Joly, K. (1997) Echelon approach to areas of concern in synoptic regional monitoring. Environmental and Ecological Statistics, 4(2), 131-52.Google Scholar
  64. Myers, W.L., Patil, G.P., and Taillie, C. (1995) Comparative paradigms for biodiversity assessment. Invited paper at the IUFRO Symposium in Chiang-mai, Thailand. In Measuring and Monitoring Biodiversity in Tropical and Temperate Forests, T.J. Boyle and B. Boontawee (eds), CIFOR, Bogor, Indonesia, pp. 67-85.Google Scholar
  65. Myers, W.L., Patil, G.P., and Taillie, C. (1999) Conceptualizing pattern analysis of spectral change relative to ecosystem health. Ecosystem Health, 5(4), 285-93.Google Scholar
  66. Neggers, J. and Kim, H.S. (1998) Basic Posets, World Scientific, Singapore.Google Scholar
  67. Newman, M.E.J. and Barkema, G.T. (1999) Monte Carlo Methods in Statistical Physics, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  68. Nusser, S.M. and Goebel, J.J. (1997) The national resources inventory: A long-term multi-resource monitoring program. Environmental and Ecological Statistics, 4, 181-204.Google Scholar
  69. Olson, J.M., Brown, D.G., Campbell, D.J., and Berry, L. (1996) A hierarchical approach to the integration of social and physical data sets: The Rwanda Society-Environmentl Project. Human Dimensions Quarterly, 4(1), 14-17.Google Scholar
  70. Opsomer, J.D. and Nusser, S.M. (1999) Sample designs for watershed assessment. Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics, 4(4), 429-42.Google Scholar
  71. Osleeb, J.P. and Kahn, S. (1999) Integration of geographic information. In Tools to Aid Environmental Decision Making, V.H. Dale, and M.R. English (eds), Springer-Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
  72. Patil, G.P., Johnson, G.D., Myers, W.L., and Taillie, C. (2000) Multiscale statistical approach to critical-area analysis and modeling of watersheds and landscapes. In Statistics for the 21st Century: Methodologies for Applications of the Future, C.R. Rao and G.J. Szekely (eds), Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, pp. 293-310.Google Scholar
  73. Patil, G.P., Myers, W.L., Luo, Z., Johnson, G.D., and Taillie, C. (1999) Multiscale assessment of landscapes and watersheds with synoptic multivariate spatial data in environmental and ecological statistics. Mathematical and Computer Modeling. (In press).Google Scholar
  74. Patil, G.P. and Taillie, C. (1999) A Markov model for hierarchically scaled landscape patterns. In Bull. of the International Statistical Institute, Vol. 58, Book 1, pp. 89-92.Google Scholar
  75. Patil, G.P. and Taillie, C. (2000a) Modeling and interpreting the accuracy assessment error matrix for a doubly classified map. Technical Report 99-0502, Center for Statistical Ecology and Environmental Statistics, Department of Statistics, Penn State University, University Park, PA.Google Scholar
  76. Patil, G.P. and Taillie, C. (2000b) A multiscale hierarchical Markov transition matrix model for generating and analyzing thematic raster maps. Technical Report 2000-0603, Center for Statistical Ecology and Environmental Statistics, Department of Statistics, Penn State University, University Park, PA.Google Scholar
  77. Patil, G.P. and Taillie, C. (2000) Analytic solution of the regularized latent truth model for binary maps. Technical Report 2000-0601, Center for Statistical Ecology and Environmental Statistics, Department of Statistics, Penn State University, University Park, PA.Google Scholar
  78. Pearson, K. (1901) Mathematical contributions to the theory of evolution. VII. On the correlation of characters not quantitatively measurable. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series A, 200, 1-66.Google Scholar
  79. Peterson, M.P. (1999) Active legends for interactive cartographic animation. International Journal of Geographic Information Science, 13(4), 375-84.Google Scholar
  80. Rauscher, H.M. and Hacker, R. (1989) Overview of artificial intelligence applications in natural resource management. J. Knowledge Engineering, 2, 30-42.Google Scholar
  81. Rhyne, T.-M. (2000) Scientific visualization in the next millennium. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 20(1), 20-1.Google Scholar
  82. Riitters, K.H., O'Neill, R.V., Hunsaker, C.T., Wickham, J.D., Yankee, D.H., Timmins, S.P., Jones, K.B., and Jackson, B.L. (1995) A factor analysis of landscape pattern and structure metrics. Landscape Ecology, 10, 23-9.Google Scholar
  83. Riley, R.H., Phillips, D.L., Schuft, M.J., and Garcia, M.C. (1997) Resolution and error in measuring land-cover change: Effects on estimating net carbon release from Mexican terrestrial ecosystems. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 18, 121-37.Google Scholar
  84. Robertson P.K. (1997) Visualizing spatial data: The problem of paradigms. International Journal of Pattern recognition and Artificial Intelligence, 11(2), 263-73.Google Scholar
  85. Rodriguez-Iturbe, I. and Rinaldo, A. (1997) Fractal River Basins: Chance and Self-Organization, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, p. 547.Google Scholar
  86. Saaty, T.L. (1999) Decision Making for Leaders: The Analytic Hierarchy Process for Decisions in a Complex World (1999/2000 edition), 3rd rev. ed., Vol. 2, RWS Publications, Pittsburgh.Google Scholar
  87. Samet, H. (1990) Applications of Spatial Data Structures: Computer Graphics, Image Processing, and GIS, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.Google Scholar
  88. Senay, H. and Ignatius, E. (1998) Rules and principles of scientific data visualization. URL: http://homer.cs.gsu.edu/classes/percept/visrules.htm.Google Scholar
  89. Smits, P.C. and Myers, W.L. Echelon approach to characterize and understand spatial structures of change in multi-temporal remote-sensing imagery. IEEE Trans. Geoscience and Remote Sensing. (under revision).Google Scholar
  90. Stehman, S.V. (1996a) Use of auxiliary data to improve the precision of estimators of thematic map accuracy. Remote Sens. Environ., 58, 169-76.Google Scholar
  91. Stehman, S.V. (1996b) Cost-effective, practical sampling strategies for accuracy assessment of large-area thematic maps. In Spatial Accuracy Assessment in Natural Resources and Environmental Sciences: Second International Symposium, General Technical Report RM-GTR-277, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, CO, pp. 485-92.Google Scholar
  92. Stehman, S.V. (1997a) Estimating standard errors of accuracy assessment statistics under cluster sampling. Remote Sens. Environ., 60, 258-69.Google Scholar
  93. Stehman, S.V. (1997b) Selecting and interpreting measures of thematic classification accuracy. Remote Sens. Environ., 62, 77-89.Google Scholar
  94. Stehman, S.V. (1999a) Basic probability sampling designs for thematic map accuracy assessment. Int. J. Remote Sensing, 20(12), 2423-41.Google Scholar
  95. Stehman, S.V. (1999b) Comparing thematic maps based on map value. Int. J. Remote Sensing, 20(12), 2347-66.Google Scholar
  96. Stehman, S.V. (1999c) Estimating the kappa coefficient and its variance under stratified random sampling. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 62, 402-7.Google Scholar
  97. Stehman, S.V. (2000) Practical implications of design-based sampling inference for thematic map accuracy assessment. Remote Sens. Environ., 72, 35-45.Google Scholar
  98. Thompson, S.K. (1982) Adaptive Sampling of Spatial Point Processes, Ph.D. Thesis, Oregon State University.Google Scholar
  99. Thompson, S.K. (1992) Sampling, John Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  100. Thompson, S.K. and Seber, G.A.F. (1996) Adaptive Sampling, John Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  101. Tran, L.T. and Duckstein, L. Comparison of fuzzy numbers using a fuzzy distance measure. Environmental and Ecological Statistics (in review).Google Scholar
  102. Treinish, L.A. (1999) Task-specific visualization design. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, September/October 1999, John Wiley and Sons, New York, pp. 72-7.Google Scholar
  103. Trotter, W.T. (1992) Combinatorics and Partially Ordered Sets, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.Google Scholar
  104. Wickham, J.D., O'Neill, R.V., Riitters, K.H., Wade, T.G., and Jones, K.B. (1997) Sensitivity of selected landscape pattern metrics to land-cover misclassification and difference in land-cover composition. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 63(4), 397-402.Google Scholar
  105. Winkler, G. (1995) Image Analysis, Random Fields and Dynamic Monte Carlo Methods: A Mathematical Introduction, Springer, New York.Google Scholar
  106. Younes, L. (1988) Estimation and annealing for Gibbsian fields. Annales de l'Institut Henri Poincare—Probabilities et Statistiques, 24, 269-94.Google Scholar
  107. Younes, L. (1991) Maximum likelihood estimation for Gibbsian fields. In Spatial Statistics and Imaging, A. Possolo (ed.), pp. 403-26.Google Scholar
  108. Zadeh, L.A. (1965) Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 8, 338-53.Google Scholar
  109. Zeleny, M. (1982) Multiple Criteria Decision Making, McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  110. Zimmerman, H.J. (1987) Fuzzy Sets, Decision Making, and Expert Systems, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • G.P. Patil
    • 1
  • J. Balbus
    • 2
  • G. Biging
    • 3
  • J. JaJa
    • 4
  • W. L. Myers
    • 1
  • C. Taillie
    • 1
  1. 1.Center for Statistical Ecology and Environmental Statistics, Department of StatisticsThe Pennsylvania State UniversityUniversity Park
  2. 2.Center for Risk Science and Public Health, Department of Occupational and Environmental HealthGeorge Washington UniversityWashington
  3. 3.ESPM-Division of Ecosystem SciencesUniversity of CaliforniaBerkeley
  4. 4.University of Maryland Institute for Computer StudiesUniversity of MarylandCollege Park

Personalised recommendations