Educational Psychology Review

, Volume 16, Issue 3, pp 235–266 | Cite as

Problem-Based Learning: What and How Do Students Learn?

Abstract

Problem-based approaches to learning have a long history of advocating experience-based education. Psychological research and theory suggests that by having students learn through the experience of solving problems, they can learn both content and thinking strategies. Problem-based learning (PBL) is an instructional method in which students learn through facilitated problem solving. In PBL, student learning centers on a complex problem that does not have a single correct answer. Students work in collaborative groups to identify what they need to learn in order to solve a problem. They engage in self-directed learning (SDL) and then apply their new knowledge to the problem and reflect on what they learned and the effectiveness of the strategies employed. The teacher acts to facilitate the learning process rather than to provide knowledge. The goals of PBL include helping students develop 1) flexible knowledge, 2) effective problem-solving skills, 3) SDL skills, 4) effective collaboration skills, and 5) intrinsic motivation. This article discusses the nature of learning in PBL and examines the empirical evidence supporting it. There is considerable research on the first 3 goals of PBL but little on the last 2. Moreover, minimal research has been conducted outside medical and gifted education. Understanding how these goals are achieved with less skilled learners is an important part of a research agenda for PBL. The evidence suggests that PBL is an instructional approach that offers the potential to help students develop flexible understanding and lifelong learning skills.

problem-based learning constructivist learning environments learning processes problem solving self-directed learning 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Abrandt Dahlgren, M., and Dahlgren, L. O. (2002). Portraits of PBL: Students' experiences of the characteristics of problem-based learning in physiotherapy, computer engineering, and psychology. Instr. Sci. 30: 111-127.Google Scholar
  2. Albanese, M. A., and Mitchell, S. (1993). Problem-based learning: A review of literature on its outcomes and implementation issues. Acad. Med. 68: 52-81.Google Scholar
  3. Ames, C. (1992). Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. J. Educ. Psychol. 84: 261-271.Google Scholar
  4. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control, Freeman, New York.Google Scholar
  5. Barron, B. J. S. (2002). Achieving coordination in collaborative problem-solving groups. J. Learn. Sci. 9: 403-437.Google Scholar
  6. Barrows, H. S. (2000). Problem-Based Learning Applied to Medical Education, Southern Illinois University Press, Springfield.Google Scholar
  7. Barrows, H., and Kelson, A. C. (1995). Problem-Based Learning in Secondary Education and the Problem-Based Learning Institute (Monograph 1), Problem-Based Learning Institute, Springfield, IL.Google Scholar
  8. Barrows, H. S., and Tamblyn, R. (1980). Problem-Based Learning: An Approach to Medical Education, Springer, New York.Google Scholar
  9. Bereiter, C., and Scardamalia, M. (1989). Intentional learning as a goal of instruction. In Resnick, L. B. (ed.), Knowing, Learning, and Instruction: Essays in Honor of Robert Glaser, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 361-392.Google Scholar
  10. Biggs, J. B. (1985). The role of metalearning in study processes. Br. J. Educ. Psychol. 55: 185-212.Google Scholar
  11. Blumberg, P., and Michael, J. A. (1992). Development of self-directed learning behaviors in a partially teacher-directed problem-based learning curriculum. Teach. Learn. Med. 4: 3-8.Google Scholar
  12. Blumenfeld, P. C., Marx, R. W., Soloway, E., and Krajcik, J. S. (1996). Learning with peers: From small group cooperation to collaborative communities. Educ. Res. 25(8): 37-40.Google Scholar
  13. Boud, D., and Feletti, G. (1991). The Challenge of Problem Based Learning, St. Martin's Press, New York.Google Scholar
  14. Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., and Cocking, R. (2000). How People Learn, National Academy Press, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  15. Bransford, J. D., and McCarrell, N. S. (1977). A sketch of a cognitive approach to comprehension: Some thoughts about understanding what it means to comprehend. In Johnson-Laird, P. N., and Wason, P. C. (eds.), Thinking: Readings in Cognitive Science, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp. 377-399.Google Scholar
  16. Bransford, J. D., Vye, N., Kinzer, C., and Risko, R. (1990). Teaching thinking and content knowledge: Toward an integrated approach. In Jones, B. F., and Idol, L. (eds.), Dimensions of Thinking and Cognitive Instruction, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 381-413.Google Scholar
  17. Bridges, E. M. (1992). Problem-Based Learning for Administrators, ERIC Clearinghouse on Educational Management, Eugene, OR.Google Scholar
  18. Brown, A. L. (1995). The advancement of learning. Educ. Res. 23(8): 4-12.Google Scholar
  19. Chi, M. T. H., Bassok, M., Lewis, M. W., Reimann, P., and Glaser, R. (1989). Self-explanations: How students study and use examples in learning to solve problems. Cogn. Sci. 13: 145-182.Google Scholar
  20. Chi, M. T. H., DeLeeuw, N., Chiu, M., and LaVancher, C. (1994). Eliciting self-explanations improves understanding. Cogn. Sci. 18: 439-477.Google Scholar
  21. Chi, M. T. H., Feltovich, P., and Glaser, R. (1981). Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices. Cogn. Sci. 5: 121-152.Google Scholar
  22. Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt (1997). The Jasper Project: Lessons in Curriculum, Instruction, Assessment, and Professional Development, Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.Google Scholar
  23. Cohen, E. G. (1994). Restructuring the classroom: Conditions for productive small groups. Rev. Educ. Res. 64: 1-35.Google Scholar
  24. Collins, A., Brown, J. S., and Newman, S. E. (1989). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the crafts of reading, writing, and mathematics. In Resnick, L. B. (ed.), Knowing, Learning, and Instruction: Essays in Honor of Robert Glaser, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 453-494.Google Scholar
  25. DeGrave, W. S., Boshuizen, H. P. A., and Schmidt, H. G. (1996). Problem-based learning: Cognitive and metacognitive processes during problem analysis. Instr. Sci. 24: 321-341.Google Scholar
  26. Derry, S. J., Lee, J., Kim, J.-B., Seymour, J., and Steinkuehler, C. A. (2001, April). From ambitious vision to partially satisfying reality: Community and collaboration in teacher education. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Seattle, WA.Google Scholar
  27. Derry, S. J., Levin, J. R., Osana, H. P., Jones, M. S., and Peterson, M. (2000). Fostering students' statistical and scientific thinking: Lessons learned from an innovative college course. Am. Educ. Res. J. 37: 747-773.Google Scholar
  28. Derry, S. J., Siegel, M., Stampen, J., and the STEP team (2002). The STEP system for collaborative case-based teacher education: Design, evaluation, and future directions. In Stahl, G. (ed.), Proceedings of CSCL 2002, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 209-216.Google Scholar
  29. Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and Education, Macmillan, New York.Google Scholar
  30. Dochy, F., Segers, M., Van den Bossche, P., and Gijbels, D. (2003). Effects of problem-based learning: A meta-analysis. Learn. Instr. 13: 533-568.Google Scholar
  31. Dods, R. F. (1997). An action research study of the effectiveness of problem-based learning in promoting the acquisition and retention of knowledge. J. Educ. Gifted 20: 423-437.Google Scholar
  32. Dolmans, D. H. J. M., and Schmidt, H. G. (2000). What directs self-directed learning in a problem-based curriculum? In Evensen, D. H., and Hmelo, C. E. (eds.), Problem-Based Learning: A Research Perspective on Learning Interactions Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, pp. 251-262.Google Scholar
  33. Duch, B. J., Groh, S. E., and Allen, D. E. (2001). The Power of Problem-Based Learning, Stylus, Steerling, VA.Google Scholar
  34. Dweck, C. S. (1991). Self-theories and goals: Their role in motivation, personality, and development. In Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 1990, University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln, pp. 199-235.Google Scholar
  35. Ertmer, P., Newby, T. J., and MacDougall, M. (1996). Students' responses and approaches to case-based instruction: The role of reflective self-regulation. Am. Educ. Res. J. 33: 719-752.Google Scholar
  36. Evensen, D. (2000). Observing self-directed learners in a problem-based learning context: Two case studies. In Evensen, D., and Hmelo, C. E. (eds.), Problem-Based Learning: A Research Perspective on Learning Interactions, Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, pp. 263-298.Google Scholar
  37. Evensen, D. H., Salisbury-Glennon, J., and Glenn, J. (2001). A qualitative study of 6 medical students in a problem-based curriculum: Towards a situated model of self-regulation. J. Educ. Psychol. 93: 659-676.Google Scholar
  38. Faidley, J., Evensen, D. H., Salisbury-Glennon, J., Glenn, J., and Hmelo, C. E. (2000). How are we doing? Methods of assessing group processing in a problem-based learning context. In Evensen, D. H., and Hmelo, C. E. (eds.), Problem-Based Learning: A Research Perspective on Learning Interactions, Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, pp. 109-135.Google Scholar
  39. Ferrari, M., and Mahalingham, R. (1998). Personal cognitive development and its implications for teaching and learning. Educ. Psychol. 33: 35-44.Google Scholar
  40. Gallagher, S., and Stepien, W. (1996). Content acquisition in problem-based learning: Depth versus breadth in American studies. J. Educ. Gifted 19: 257-275.Google Scholar
  41. Gallagher, S. A., Stepien, W. J., and Rosenthal, H. (1992). The effects of problem-based learning on problem solving. Gifted Child Q. 36: 195-200.Google Scholar
  42. Gick, M. L., and Holyoak, K. J. (1980). Analogical problem solving. Cogn. Psychol. 12: 306-355.Google Scholar
  43. Gick, M. L., and Holyoak, K. J. (1983). Schema induction and analogical transfer. Cogn. Psychol. 15: 1-38.Google Scholar
  44. Goodman, L. J., Erich, E., Brueschke, E. E., Bone, R. C., Rose, W. H., Williams, E. J., and Paul, H. A. (1991). An experiment in medical education: A critical analysis using traditional criteria. JAMA 265: 2373-2376.Google Scholar
  45. Greeno, J. G., Collins, A., and Resnick, L. B. (1996). Cognition and learning. In Berliner, D. C., and Calfee, R. C. (eds.), Handbook of Educational Psychology, Macmillan, New York, pp. 15-46.Google Scholar
  46. Hmelo, C. E. (1994). Development of Independent Thinking and Learning Skills: A Study of Medical Problem-Solving and Problem-Based Learning, Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN.Google Scholar
  47. Hmelo, C. E. (1998). Problem-based learning: Effects on the early acquisition of cognitive skill in medicine. J. Learn. Sci. 7: 173-208.Google Scholar
  48. Hmelo, C. E., and Ferrari, M. (1997). The problem-based learning tutorial: Cultivating higher-order thinking skills. J. Educ. Gifted 20: 401-422.Google Scholar
  49. Hmelo, C. E., Gotterer, G. S., and Bransford, J. D. (1997). A theory-driven approach to assessing the cognitive effects of PBL. Instr. Sci. 25: 387-408.Google Scholar
  50. Hmelo, C. E., and Guzdial, M. (1996). Of black and glass boxes: Scaffolding for learning and doing. In Edelson, D. C., and Domeshek, E. A. (eds.), Proceedings of ICLS 96, AACE, Charlottesville, VA, pp. 128-134.Google Scholar
  51. Hmelo, C. E., Holton, D., and Kolodner, J. L. (2000). Designing to learn about complex systems. J. Learn. Sci. 9: 247-298.Google Scholar
  52. Hmelo, C. E., and Lin, X. (2000). The development of self-directed learning strategies in problem-based learning. In Evensen, D., and Hmelo, C. E. (eds.), Problem-Based Learning: Research Perspectives on Learning Interactions, Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, pp. 227-250.Google Scholar
  53. Hmelo, C., Shikano, T., Bras, B., Mulholland, J., Realff, M., and Vanegas, J. (1995). A problem-based course in sustainable technology. In Budny, D., Herrick, R., Bjedov, G., and Perry, J. B. (eds.), Frontiers in Education 1995, American Society for Engineering Education, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  54. Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2000). Knowledge recycling: Crisscrossing the landscape of educational psychology in a Problem-Based Learning Course for Preservice Teachers. J. Excell. Coll. Teach. 11: 41-56.Google Scholar
  55. Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2002). Collaborative ways of knowing: Issues in facilitation. In Stahl, G. (ed.), Proceedings of CSCL 2002, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 199-208.Google Scholar
  56. Hmelo-Silver, C. E., and Barrows, H. S. (2003). Facilitating collaborative ways of knowing. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
  57. Hmelo-Silver, C. E., and Barrows, H.S. (2002, April). Goals and strategies of a constructivist teacher. Paper presented at American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, New Orleans, LA.Google Scholar
  58. Kilpatrick, W. H. (1918). The project method. Teach. Coll. Rec. 19: 319-335.Google Scholar
  59. Kilpatrick, W. H. (1921). Dangers and difficulties of the project method and how to overcome them: Introductory statement: Definition of terms. Teach. Coll. Rec. 22: 282-288.Google Scholar
  60. Kolodner, J. L. (1993). Case-Based Reasoning, Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA.Google Scholar
  61. Kolodner, J. L., Hmelo, C. E., and Narayanan, N. H. (1996). Problem-based learning meets case-based reasoning. In Edelson, D. C., and Domeshek, E. A. (eds.), Proceedings of ICLS 96, AACE, Charlottesville, VA, pp. 188-195.Google Scholar
  62. Koschmann, T. D., Myers, A. C., Feltovich, P. J., and Barrows, H. S. (1994). Using technology to assist in realizing effective learning and instruction: A principled approach to the use of computers in collaborative learning. J. Learn. Sci. 3: 225-262.Google Scholar
  63. Krajcik, J., Blumenfeld, P., Marx, R., and Soloway, E. (2000). Instructional, curricular, and technological supports for inquiry in science classrooms. In Minstrell, J., and Van Zee, E. H. (eds.), Inquiring Into Inquiry Learning and Teaching in Science, American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington, DC, pp. 283-315.Google Scholar
  64. Krajcik, J., Marx, R., Blumenfeld, P., Soloway, E., and Fishman, B. (2000, April). Inquiry-based science supported by technology: Achievement among urban middle school students. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.Google Scholar
  65. Lampert, M. (2001). Teaching Problems and the Problems of Teaching, Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.Google Scholar
  66. Leontiev, A. N. (1978). Activity, Consciousness, and Personality (M. J. Hall, Trans.), Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.Google Scholar
  67. Lesgold, A., Rubinson, H., Feltovich, P., Glaser, R., Klopfer, D., and Wang, Y. (1988). Expertise in a complex skill: Diagnosing x-ray pictures. In Chi, M. T. H., Glaser, R., and Farr, M. J. (eds.), The Nature of Expertise, Erlbaum. Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 311-342.Google Scholar
  68. Linn, M. C., and Hsi, S. (2000). Computers, Teachers, Peers: Science Learning Partners, Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.Google Scholar
  69. Mennin, S. P., Friedman, M., Skipper, B., Kalishman, S., and Snyder, J. (1993). Performances on the NBME I, II, and III by medical students in the problem-based and conventional tracks at the University of New Mexico. Acad. Med. 68: 616-624.Google Scholar
  70. Needham, D. R., and Begg, I. M. (1991). Problem-oriented training promotes spontaneous analogical transfer. Memory-oriented training promotes memory for training. Mem. Cogn. 19: 543-557.Google Scholar
  71. Norman, G. R., Brooks, L. R., Colle, C., and Hatala, H. (1998). Relative effectiveness of instruction in forward and backward reasoning. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA.Google Scholar
  72. Norman, G. R., Trott, A. D., Brooks, L. R., and Smith, E. K. (1994). Cognitive differences in clinical reasoning related to postgraduate training. Teach. Learn. Med. 6: 114-120.Google Scholar
  73. Novick, L. R., and Hmelo, C. E. (1994). Transferring symbolic representations across nonisomorphic problems. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 20: 1296-1321.Google Scholar
  74. Novick, L. R., and Holyoak, K. J. (1991). Mathematical problem solving by analogy. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 17: 398-415.Google Scholar
  75. O'Donnell, A. M. (1999). Structuring dyadic interaction through scripted cooperation. In O'Donnell, A. M., and King, A. (eds.), Cognitive Perspectives on Peer Learning, Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, pp. 179-196.Google Scholar
  76. Palincsar, A. S., and Herrenkohl, L. R. (1999). Designing collaborative contexts: Lessons from three research programs. In O'Donnell, A. M., and King, A. (eds.), Cognitive Perspectives on Peer Learning,Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, pp. 151-178.Google Scholar
  77. Patel, V. L., Groen, G. J., and Norman, G. R. (1991). Effects of conventional and problem-based medical curricula on problem solving. Acad. Med. 66: 380-389.Google Scholar
  78. Patel, V. L., Groen, G. J., and Norman, G. R. (1993). Reasoning and instruction in medical curricula. Cogn. Instr. 10: 335-378.Google Scholar
  79. Pea, R. D. (1993). Practices of distributed intelligence and designs for education. In Salomon, G., and Perkins, D. (eds.), Distributed Cognitions: Psychological and Educational Considerations, Cambridge University Press, New York, pp. 47-87.Google Scholar
  80. Perfetto, G. A., Bransford, J. D., and Franks, J. J. (1983). Constraints on access in a problem-solving context. Mem. Cogn. 11: 24-31.Google Scholar
  81. Puntambekar, S., and Kolodner, J. L. (1998). The design diary: A tool to support students in learning science by design. In Bruckman, A. S., Guzdial, M., Kolodner, J., and Ram, A. (eds.), Proceedings of ICLS 98, AACE, Charlottesville, VA, pp. 230-236.Google Scholar
  82. Ram, P. (1999). Problem-based learning in undergraduate instruction: A sophomore chemistry laboratory. J. Chem. Educ. 76: 1122-1126.Google Scholar
  83. Ramsden, P. (1992). Learning to Teach in Higher Education, Routledge, New York.Google Scholar
  84. Salomon, G. (1993). No distribution without individual cognition: A dynamic interactional view. In Salomon, G., and Perkins, D. (eds.), Distributed Cognitions: Psychological and Educational Considerations,Cambridge University Press, New York, pp. 111-138.Google Scholar
  85. Salomon, G., and Perkins, D. N. (1989). Rocky roads to transfer: Rethinking mechanisms of a neglected phenomenon. Educ. Psychol. 24: 113-142.Google Scholar
  86. Schmidt, H. G., DeVolder, M. L., De Grave, W. S., Moust, J. H. C., and Patel, V. L. (1989). Explanatory models in the processing of science text: The role of prior knowledge activation through small-group discussion. J. Educ. Psychol. 81: 610-619.Google Scholar
  87. Schmidt, H. G., Machiels-Bongaerts, M., Hermans, H., ten Cate, T. J., Venekamp, R., and Boshuizen, H. P. A. (1996). The development of diagnostic competence: Comparison of a problem-based, an integrated, and a conventional medical curriculum. Acad. Med. 71: 658-664.Google Scholar
  88. Schmidt, H. G., and Moust, J. H. C. (2000). Factors affecting small-group tutorial learning: A review of research. In Evensen, D., and Hmelo, C. E. (eds.), Problem-Based Learning: A Research Perspective on Learning Interactions, Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, pp. 19-51.Google Scholar
  89. Schwartz, D. L., and Bransford, J. D. (1998). A time for telling. Cogn. Instr. 16: 475-522.Google Scholar
  90. Schoenfeld, A. H. (1985). Mathematical Problem Solving, Academic Press, Orlando, FL.Google Scholar
  91. Shikano, T., and Hmelo, C. E. (1996, April). Students' learning strategies in a problem-based curriculum for sustainable technology. Paper presented at American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, New York.Google Scholar
  92. Steinkuehler, C. A., Derry, S. J., Hmelo-Silver, C. E., and DelMarcelle, M. (2002). Cracking the resource nut with distributed problem-based learning in secondary teacher education. J. Distance Educ. 23: 23-39.Google Scholar
  93. Stepien, W. J., and Gallagher, S. A. (1993). Problem-based learning: As authentic as it gets. Educ. Leadersh. 50(7): 25-29.Google Scholar
  94. Torp, L., and Sage, S. (2002). Problems as Possibilities: Problem-Based Learning for K-12 Education, 2nd edn., ASCD, Alexandria, VA.Google Scholar
  95. Vernon, D. T., and Blake, R. L. (1993). Does problem-based learning work?: A meta-analysis of evaluative research. Acad. Med. 68: 550-563.Google Scholar
  96. Vye, N. J., Goldman, S. R., Voss, J. F., Hmelo, C., and Williams, S. (1997). Complex math problem-solving by individuals and dyads: When and why are two heads better than one? Cogn. Instr. 15: 435-484.Google Scholar
  97. Webb, N. M., and Palincsar, A. S. (1996). Group processes in the classroom. In Berliner, D., and Calfee, R. (eds.), Handbook of Educational Psychology, MacMillan, New York, pp. 841-876.Google Scholar
  98. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity, Cambridge University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  99. White, B. Y., and Frederiksen, J. R. (1998). Inquiry, modeling, and metacognition: Making science accessible to all students. Cogn. Instr. 16: 3-118.Google Scholar
  100. Williams, S. M. (1992). Putting case based learning into context: Examples from legal, business, and medical education. J. Learn. Sci. 2: 367-427.Google Scholar
  101. Williams, S. M., Bransford, J. D., Vye, N. J., Goldman, S. R., and Carlson, K. (1993). Positive and negative effects of specific knowledge on mathematical problem solving. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, Atlanta, GA.Google Scholar
  102. Zimmerman, B. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory Pract. 41, 64-71.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Educational Psychology, RutgersThe State University of New JerseyNew Brunswick

Personalised recommendations