Educational Psychology Review

, Volume 16, Issue 3, pp 207–234 | Cite as

A New Perspective on Perspective Taking: A Multidimensional Approach to Conceptualizing an Aptitude

Article

Abstract

Social perspective taking (SPT) is thought to be important in its own right and is often associated with other important skills, such as interpersonal conflict resolution. Previous research on SPT, however, has conceptualized it as a unidimensional construct leaving scholars with an insufficient understanding of this aptitude and how it relates to valued educational outcomes. To best understand SPT, a multidimensional approach should include assessments of personal characteristics (including the propensity and the ability to engage in SPT) and features of the situation (including features of the SPT task and the larger context). Using Richard Snow's conceptualization of aptitudes as a framework, this article illustrates the problems with treating SPT as a unidimensional construct, defines SPT as a complex aptitude, and provides a taxonomy of SPT to promote understanding and to guide future research in this area. The taxonomy organizes and reviews the existing literature that relates personal and situational characteristics to SPT aptitude. Where research has not yet been conducted, this article hypothesizes how these characteristics might relate to SPT aptitude.

perspective taking conflict resolution aptitude motivation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Allport, G. W. (1954). The Nature of Prejudice, Addison-Wesley, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  2. Batson, C. D., Early, S., and Salvarani, G. (1995). Immorality from empathy-induced altruism: When compassion and justice conflict. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 68(6): 1042-1054.Google Scholar
  3. Bernstein, W. M., and Davis, M. H. (1982). Perspective-taking, self-consciousness, and accuracy in person perception. Basic Appl. Soc. Psychol. 3(1): 1-19.Google Scholar
  4. Bissonnette, V. L., Rusbult, C. E., and Kilpatrick, S. D. (1997). Empathic accuracy and marital conflict resolution. In Ickes, W. J. (ed.), Empathic Accuracy, Guilford Press, New York, (pp. 251-281).Google Scholar
  5. Brewer, M. B. (1979). In-group bias in the minimal intergroup situation: A cognitive-motivational analysis. Psychol. Bull. 86: 307-324.Google Scholar
  6. Colvin, C. R., Vogt, D., and Ickes, W. J. (1997). Why do friends understand each other better than strangers do? In Ickes, W. J. (ed.), Empathic Accuracy, Guilford Press, New York, (pp. 169-193).Google Scholar
  7. Corcoran, K. O., and Mallinckrodt, B. (2000). Adult attachment, self-efficacy, perspective taking, and conflict resolution. J. Counsel. Dev. 78(4): 473-483.Google Scholar
  8. Corno, L., Cronbach, L. J., Kupermintz, H., Lohman, D. F., Mandinach, E. B., Porteus, A. W., et al. (2002). Remaking the Concept of Aptitude: Extending the Legacy of Richard E. Snow, Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.Google Scholar
  9. Davis, M. H. (1983). Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 44(1): 113-126.Google Scholar
  10. Davis, M. H., and Franzoi, S. L. (1991). Stability and change in adolescent self-consciousness and empathy. J. Res. Pers. 25(1): 70-87.Google Scholar
  11. Davis, M. H., and Kraus, L. A. (1997). Personality and empathtic accuracy. In Ickes, W. J. (ed.), Empathic Accuracy, Guilford Press, New York, pp. 144-168.Google Scholar
  12. Deutsch, M. (1993). Educating for a peaceful world. Am. Psychol. 48(5): 510-517.Google Scholar
  13. Deutsch, M. (2000). Cooperation and competition. In Deutsch, M., and Coleman, P. T. (eds.), The Handbook of Conflict Resolution: Theory and Practice, 1st edn., Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, pp. 21-40.Google Scholar
  14. Devine, P. (1995). Prejudice and out-group perception. In Tesser, A. (ed.), Advanced Social Psychology, McGraw-Hill, New York, pp. 466-524.Google Scholar
  15. Drolet, A., Larrick, R., and Morris, M. W. (1998). Thinking of others: How perspective taking changes negotiators' aspirations and fairness perceptions as a function of negotiator relationships. Basic Appl. Soc. Psychol. 20(1): 23-31.Google Scholar
  16. Eccles, J. (1984). Sex differences in achievement patterns. In Sonderegger, T. B. (ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln, Vol. 32, pp. 97-132.Google Scholar
  17. Eisenberg, N., Murphy, B. C., and Shepard, S. (1997). The development of empathic accuracy. In Ickes, W. J. (ed.), Empathic Accuracy, Guilford Press, New York, pp. 73-116.Google Scholar
  18. Ekman, P. (1993). Facial expression and emotion. Am. Psychol. 48(4): 384-392.Google Scholar
  19. Fiske, S. T. (1995). Social cognition. In Tesser, A. (ed.), Advanced Social Psychology, McGraw-Hill, New York, pp. 145-194.Google Scholar
  20. Foster, S. J. (2001). Historical empathy in theory and practice: Some final thoughts. In Davis, O. L., Yeager, E. A., and Foster, S. J. (eds.), Historical Empathy and Perspective Taking in the Social Studies, Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham, MD, pp. 167-181.Google Scholar
  21. Galinsky, A. D., and Moskowitz, G. B. (2000). Perspective-taking: Decreasing stereotype expression, stereotype accessibility, and in-group favoritism. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 78(4): 708-724.Google Scholar
  22. Graham, T., and Ickes, W. J. (1997). When women's intuition isn't greater than men's. In Ickes, W. J. (ed.), Empathic Accuracy, The Guilford Press, New York, pp. 117-143.Google Scholar
  23. Gustafsson, J. E. (1984). A unifying model for the structure of intellectual abilities. Intelligence 8(3): 179-203.Google Scholar
  24. Hodges, S. D., and Wegner, D. M. (1997). Automatic and controlled empathy. In Ickes, W. J. (ed.), Empathic Accuracy, Guilford Press, New York, pp. 311-340.Google Scholar
  25. Hoffman, M. L. (2000). Empathy and Moral Development: Implications for Caring and Justice, Cambridge University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  26. Ickes, W. J. (ed.) (1997). Empathic Accuracy, The Guilford Press, New York.Google Scholar
  27. Ickes, W. J., Stinson, L., Bissonnette, V., and Garcia, S. (1990). Naturalistic social cognition: Empathic accuracy in mixed-sex dyads. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 59(4): 730-742.Google Scholar
  28. Johnson, D. W. (1975). Cooperativeness and social perspective taking. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 31: 241-244.Google Scholar
  29. Jones, E. E., and Nisbett, R. E. (1971). The actor and the observer: Divergent perceptions of the causes of behavior. In Jones, E. E., Kanouse, D. E., Kelly, H. H., Nisbett, R. E., Valins, S., and Weiner, B. (eds.), Attribution: Perceiving the Causes of Behavior, General Learning Press, Morristown, NJ, pp. 79-94.Google Scholar
  30. Kohlberg, L. (1994). Kohlberg's Original Study of Moral Development, Garland, New York.Google Scholar
  31. Martinez, M. E. (2000). Education as the Cultivation of Intelligence, Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.Google Scholar
  32. Mendoza, R. (1997). Emotional Versus Situational Inductions of Empathy: Effects on Interpersonal Understanding and Punitiveness, Unpublished dissertation, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
  33. Morris, M. W., and Peng, K. (1994). Culture and cause: American and Chinese attributions for social and physical events. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 67(6): 949-971.Google Scholar
  34. Nucci, L. (1989). Challenging conventional wisdom about morality: The domain approach to values education. In Nucci, L. (ed.), Moral Development and Character Education: A Dialogue,McCutchan, Berkeley, CA, pp. 183-203.Google Scholar
  35. O'Donoghue, T., and Rabin, M. (2000). Risky behavior among youths: Some issues from behavioral economics. In Gruber, J. (ed.), Risky Behavior Among Youths: An Economic Analysis, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 29-67.Google Scholar
  36. Oswald, P. A. (2002). The interactive effects of affective demeanor, cognitive processes, and perspective-taking focus on helping behavior. J. Soc. Psychol. 142(1): 120-132.Google Scholar
  37. Roeser, R. W., Eccles, J. S., and Strobel, K. R. (1998). Linking the study of schooling and mental health: Selected issues and empirical illustrations at the level of the individual. Special Issue: Schooling and mental health: Issues, research, and future directions. Educ. Psychol. 33(4): 153-176.Google Scholar
  38. Rokeach, M. (1960). The Open and Closed Mind: Investigations Into the Nature of Belief Systems and Personality Systems, Basic Books, New York.Google Scholar
  39. Rosenbaum, M. E., and Holtz, R. (1985).The minimal intergroup discrimination effect: Outgroup derogation, not ingroup favoritism. Paper presented at the 93rd annual convention of the American Psychological Association, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
  40. Ross, L., Amabile, T. M., and Steinmetz, J. L. (1977). Social roles, social control, and biases in social-perception processes. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 35(7): 485-494.Google Scholar
  41. Ross, L., and Nisbett, R. E. (1991). The Person and the Situation: Perspectives of Social Psychology, McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  42. Sandy, S. V., and Cochran, K. M. (2000). The development of conflict resolution skills in children: Preschool to adolescence. In Deutsch, M., and Coleman, P. T. (eds.), The Handbook of Conflict Resolution: Theory and Practice, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, pp. 316-342.Google Scholar
  43. Selman, R. L. (1976). Social-cognitive understanding: A guide to educational and clinical practice. In Lickona, T. (ed.), Moral Development and Behavior, Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, New York, pp. 299-316.Google Scholar
  44. Selman, R. L. (1980). The Growth of Interpersonal Understanding: Developmental and Clinical Analyses, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  45. Simpson, J. A., Ickes, W., and Blackstone, T. (1995). When the head protects the heart: Empathic accuracy in dating relationships. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 69(4): 629-641.Google Scholar
  46. Snow, R. E. (1994). Abilities in academic tasks. In Sternberg, R. J., and Wagner, R. K. (eds.), Mind in Context: Interactionist Perspectives on Human Intelligence, Cambridge University Press, New York, pp. 3-37.Google Scholar
  47. Snow, R. E. (1996). Aptitude development and education. Psychol. Public Policy Law 2(3/4): 536-560.Google Scholar
  48. Snow, R. E., Corno, L., and Jackson, D. (1996). Individual differences in affective and conative functions. In Berliner, D. C., and Calfee, R. C. (eds.), Handbook of Educational Psychology, Macmillan Library Reference, New York, pp. 243-310.Google Scholar
  49. Snow, R. E., and Yalow, E. (1982). Education and intelligence. In Sternberg, R. J. (ed.), Handbook of Human Intelligence, Cambridge University Press, New York, pp. 493-585.Google Scholar
  50. Stinson, L., and Ickes, W. (1992). Empathic accuracy in the interactions of male friends versus male strangers. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 62(5): 787-797.Google Scholar
  51. Taylor, S. E., and Fiske, S. T. (1975). Point of view and perceptions of causality. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 32(3): 439-445.Google Scholar
  52. Wegner, D. M. (1994). Ironic processes of mental control. Psychol. Rev. 101(1): 34-52.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Psychological Studies in EducationStanford University School of EducationStanford

Personalised recommendations