Ecotoxicology

, Volume 13, Issue 6, pp 589–601 | Cite as

Coumaphos Distribution in the Hive Ecosystem: Case Study for Modeling Applications

  • Paolo Tremolada
  • Iris Bernardinelli
  • Mario Colombo
  • Massimo Spreafico
  • Marco Vighi
Article

Abstract

Pesticides are currently used inside hives, against the honeybee parasite Varroa destructor, producing unwanted contamination effects. To assess the distribution and fate of one of these pesticides (coumaphos), two experimental hives were treated with Perizin (the commercial product containing the active ingredient coumaphos). Samples of honey, wax, pollen, adult bees and larvae taken before treatment and up to 104 days afterwards, showed diffuse contamination. Wood hedges and wax bridges, where the pesticide solution was applied, were analysed as well. A mass balance was calculated, yielding a recovered amount of around 60% just after treatment and 38% 1 month later. Directly contaminated surfaces and wax contained the highest amount of residues. Wax and honey contained different amounts (10, and 0.1% respectively) but both retained residues for long time. Bees ingest most of the product just after treatment, then rapidly eliminate it by metabolism, advection and deposition processes. On the basis of analytical results, a simple model (level I of the fugacity model) was applied to the hive system for different pesticides (coumaphos, malathion, fluvalinate and bromopropylate). Predicted concentrations in wax and honey were compared with those measured, indicating the good predictive capability of this approach.

honeybees coumaphos pesticide distribution evaluative models 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alamanni, M.C., Cossu, M. and Spanu, S. (1999). Determination of coumaphos residues in samples of sardinian honey. Rivista di Scienze dell'Alimentazione 28(2), 171–5.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, D.L. and Trueman, J.W.H. (2000). Varroa jacobsoni (Acari Varroidae) is more than one species. Exp. Appl. Acarol. 24(3), 165–89.Google Scholar
  3. Bogdanov, S., Kilchenmann, V. and Imdorf, A. (1998). Acaricide residues in some bee products. J. Apicultural Res. 37(2), 57–67.Google Scholar
  4. Bonaga, G., Giumanini, A.G. and Gliozzi, G. (1986). Chemical composition of chesnut honey: analysis of the hydrocarbon fraction. J. Agric. Food Chem. 34, 319–26.Google Scholar
  5. Borneck, R. (1991). FrLes Residus des Produits de Traitment Antivarroa dans las Miels et les Cieres. La Santé de l''beille 126 bis, 36–8.Google Scholar
  6. Cowan, C.E., Mackay, D., Feijtel, T.C.J., Van de Meent, D., Di Guardo, A. and Davies (1995). The Multimedia Fate Model: A Vital Tool for Predicting the Fate of Chemicals. Pensacola FL: SETAC Press.Google Scholar
  7. Di Guardo, A., Calamari, D., Zanin, G., Consalter, A. and Mackay, D. (1994). A fugacity model of pesticide runoff to surface water: development and validation. Chemosphere 28, 511–31.Google Scholar
  8. Lodesani, M., Pellacani, A., Bergomi, S., Carpana, E., Rabitti, T. and Lasagni, P. (1992). Residue determination for some products used against varroa infestation in bees. Apidologie 23, 257–72.Google Scholar
  9. Mackay, D. (1991). Multimedia Environmental Models, the Fugacity Approach. Chelsea MI: Lewis Publishers.Google Scholar
  10. Marchetti, S. and D'Agaro, M. (1986). Perizin liquid, a systemic agent for the chemical control of varroatosis. Apicoltura 2, 67–76.Google Scholar
  11. Seeley, T.D., (1985). Honeybee ecology. A study of adaptation in social life. J.R. Krebs and T. Clutton-Brock (eds). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Taccheo Barbina, M., De Paoli, M., Barbattini, R., Chiesa, F., Milani, N. and d'Agaro, M. (1989a). Residues in hive products of chemicals used to control Varroa jacobsoni OUD. In R. Cavallaro (ed). Present Status of Varroatosis in Europe and Progress in the Varroa Mite Control. Proceedings Meet. EC Expert's Group, Udine, 1989, pp.369–77. Luxembourg: Office Official Pub. European Communities.Google Scholar
  13. Taccheo Barbina, M., De Paoli, M., Chiesa, F., d'Agaro, M. and Pecol, U. (1989b). Coumaphos decay and residues in honey samples. In: R. Cavallaro (ed). Present Status of Varroatosis in Europe and Progress in the Varroa Mite Control. Proceedings Meet. EC Expert's Group, Udine, 1989, pp. 379–86. Luxembourg: Office Official Pub. European Communities.Google Scholar
  14. Thrasyvoulou, A.T. and Pappas, N. (1988). Contamination of honey and wax with malathion and coumaphos used against the varroa mite. J. Apicultural Res. 27(1), 55–61.Google Scholar
  15. Tomlin, C.D.S. (1997). The Pesticide Manual: A World Compendium. (7th edn.) Farnham, UK: British Crop Protection Council (eds).Google Scholar
  16. Torretti, L., Simonella, A., Calvarese, S., Di Francesco, C., Filipponi, C., Scacchia, M. and Simonella, G. (1989). Gas-chromatographic survey of bromopropylate residues in honey produced in abruzzi (Central Italy). In R. Cavallaro (ed). Present Status of Varroatosis in Europe and Progress in the Varroa Mite Control. Proceedings Meet. EC Expert's Group, Udine, 1989, pp. 387–92. Luxembourg: Office Offi-cial Pub. European Communities.Google Scholar
  17. Van Buren, N.W.M., Marin, J., Velthuis, H.H.W. and Oudejans, R.C.H.M. (1992). Residues in beeswax and honey of perizin, an acaricide to combat the mite Varroa jacobsoni Oudemans (Acari: Mesostigmata). Environ. Entomol. 21(4), 860–5.Google Scholar
  18. Wallner, K. (1995). The use of varroacides and their influence on the quality of bee products. Am. Bee J. 135 (12), 817–21.Google Scholar
  19. Wania, F. and Mackay, D. (1995). A global distribution model for persistent organic chemicals. Sci. Total Environ. 160/161, 211–32.Google Scholar
  20. Weast, R.C., Lide, D.R., Astle, M.J. and Beyer, W.H. (eds). (1989). CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 70th edn. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paolo Tremolada
    • 1
  • Iris Bernardinelli
    • 2
  • Mario Colombo
    • 3
  • Massimo Spreafico
    • 3
  • Marco Vighi
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of BiologyUniversity of MilanoVia Celoria, 26Italy
  2. 2.Department of Biology Applied to Plant DefenceUniversity of UdineVia delle Scienze, 208Italy
  3. 3.Institute of Agricultural EntomologyUniversity of MilanoVia Celoria, 2Italy
  4. 4.Department of Environmental and Landscape ScienceUniversity of Milano BicoccaPiazza della Scienza, 1Italy

Personalised recommendations