Ecotoxicology

, Volume 13, Issue 3, pp 207–221 | Cite as

Retrospective Study of Mercury in Raccoons (Procyon lotor) in South Florida

  • D. B. Porcella
  • E. J. Zillioux
  • T. M. Grieb
  • J. R. Newman
  • G. B. West
Article

Abstract

Museum and recent collections of raccoon hair were used to assess whether temporal or spatial trends existed in MMHg distributions in south Florida. The hypothesis that MMHg in raccoon hair had remained the same since 1947 could not be rejected. Some sampling regions showed increases while others did not. However, large differences existed between sites, amounting to a factor of 20 for raccoons collected during 2000 and during the period prior to 1960 (museum samples). Raccoon feeding behavior and the production of MMHg most probably accounted for the spatial differences. Large differences in MMHg concentrations existed in different tissues ranging in order of hair, liver, kidney, muscle, heart, brain, and blood in their respective ratios to blood: 96:10:6:5:4:2.5:1. Liver Hg is 7% MMHg, while hair Hg is 99% MMHg. These associations appear largely regulated by metabolic processes. Speciation of Hg is very important for gaining an understanding of ecosystem and organism Hg dynamics. Further work is needed to establish whether Se plays a role in Hg sequestration and whether hair Hg is a good surrogate for estimating Hg concentrations in other tissues in south Florida raccoon populations.

mercury monomethylmercury raccoons trends accumulation feeding 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arnold, B.S. (2000). Distribution of mercury within different trophic levels of the Okefenokee swamp, within tissues of top level predators, and reproductive effects of methyl mercury in the Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). PhD Dissertation. University of Georgia, Athens GA. 200 pp.Google Scholar
  2. Atkeson, T. and Parks, P. (2001) (draft). Chapter 2B: mercury monitoring, research, and environmental assessment. In SFWMD. 2002. Everglades Consolidated Report. South Florida Water Management District. West Palm Beach, FL, pp. 2B–1–27.Google Scholar
  3. Berg, W., Johnels, A., Sjöstrand, B. and Westermark. T. (1966). Mercury content in feathers of Swedish birds from the past 100 years. Oikos 17, 71–83.Google Scholar
  4. Bloom, N.S. (1992). On the chemical form of mercury in edible fish and marine invertebrate tissue. Can.J.Fish.Aquat.Sci. 49, 1010–7.Google Scholar
  5. Caldwell, J.A. (1963). An Investigation of Raccoons in North-central Florida. Master of Science Thesis, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL. 88 pp.Google Scholar
  6. Cernichiaria, E., Brewer, R., Myers, G.J., Marsh, D.O., Lapham, L.M., Cox, C., Shamlaye, C.F., Berlin, M., Davidson, P.W. and Clarkson, T.W. (1995a). Monitoring methylmercury during pregnancy: maternal hair predicts fetal brain exposure. NeuroToxicology 16, 705–10.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Cernichiaria, E., Toribara, T.Y., Liang, L., Marsh, D.O., Berlin, M.W., Myers, G.J., Cox, C., Shamlaye, C.F., Choisy, O., Davidson, P.W. and Clarkson, T.W. (1995b). The biological monitoring of mercury in the Seychelles study. NeuroToxicology 16, 613–28.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Chupp, C. and Sherf, A.F. (1960). Vegetable Diseases and Their Control. New York: The Roland Press Company.Google Scholar
  9. Clarkson, T.W. (1994). The toxicology of mercury and its compounds. In C.J. Watras and J.W. Huckabee (eds) Mercury Pollution: integration and synthesis, pp. 631–41. Boca Raton: Lewis Publishers. FL: CRC Press.Google Scholar
  10. Cleckner, L.B., Garrison, P.J., Hurley, J.P., Olson, M.L. and Krabbenhoft, D.P. (1998). Trophic transfer of methyl mercury in the northern Florida Everglades. Biogeochemistry 40, 347–61.Google Scholar
  11. Cornwell, G.W. and Atkins, K. (1975). The Impact of Evicting Farmers from Everglades National Park's Hole-in-the-Donut. Report to the South Florida Tomato and Vegetable Growers, Inc. Homestead, FL. 184 pp.Google Scholar
  12. Cumbie, P.M. (1975a). Mercury in hair of bobcats and raccoons. J.Wildl.Manage. 39, 419–25.Google Scholar
  13. Cumbie, P.M. (1975b). Mercury accumulation in wildlife in the southeast. PhD Dissertation. University of Georgia, Athens, GA. 148 pp.Google Scholar
  14. Cumbie, P.M. and Jenkins, J. H. (1974). Mercury accumulation in native mammals of the southeast. In Proceedings of the 28th Annual Conference of the Southeastern Association of Game and Fish Commissioners, pp. 639–48. (NB: lower coastal plain of GA, mean raccoon hair is 6.1 ppm Hg, range is 0.23–50.6.)Google Scholar
  15. Davis, A.H. (1981). Ecological and physiological parameters of mercury and cesium-137 accumulation in the raccoon. PhD Dissertation. University of Georgia, Athens, GA. 154 pp. (NB: coastal Georgia raccoon hair mean is 6.7 ppm Hg, range is 0.3–27.51.)Google Scholar
  16. Delfino, J.J., Crisman, T.L., Gottgens, J.F., Rood, B.E. and Earle, C.D.A. (1993). Spatial and temporal distribution of Hg in Everglades and Okefenokee wetland sediments. University of Florida. Gainesville, FL. 140 pp.Google Scholar
  17. Eisemann, J.D., Beyer, W.N., Bennetts, R.E. and Morton, A. (1997). Mercury residues in south Florida apple snails (Pomacea paludosa). Bull.Environ.Contam.Toxicol. 58, 739–43.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. EPRI. (1996). Protocol for estimating historic atmospheric mercury deposition. EPRI TR-106768. Electric Power Research Institute. Palo Alto, CA. 49 pp.Google Scholar
  19. Evans, R.D., Addison, E.M., Villeneuve, J.Y., MacDonald, K.S., and Joachim, D.G. (2000). Distribution of Inorganic and methylmercury among tissues in mink (Mustela vison) and otter (Lutra canadensis). In Proceedings of Mercury as a Global Pollutant: 5th International Conference, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 23–28 May 1999. New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  20. Ewel, J.J., Ojima, D.S., Karl, D.A. and DeBusk, W.F. (1982). Schinus in successional ecosystems of Everglades National Park, Report T-676. National Park Service, South Florida Research Center, Everglades National Park, Homestead, FL. 141 pp.Google Scholar
  21. Fortin, C., Beauchamp, G., Dansereau, M., Lariviere, N. and Belanger, D. (2001). Spatial variation in mercury concentrations in wild mink and river otter carcasses from the James Bay Territory, Quebec, Canada. Arch.Environ.Contam.Toxicol. 40, 121–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Frederick, P.C., Spalding, M.G. and Dusek, R. (2002). Wading birds as bioindicators of mercury contamination in Florida, USA: annual and geographic variation. Environ.Toxicol.Chem. 21, 163–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Gilmour, C.C., Riedel, G.S., Ederington, M.C., Bell, J.T., Benoit, J.M., Gill, G.A. and Stordal, M.C. (1998). Methyl-mercury concentrations and production rates across a trophic gradient in the northern Everglades. Biogeochemistry 40(2/3), 327–45.Google Scholar
  24. Gough, L.P., Kotra, R.K., Holmes, C.W., Orem, W.H., Hageman, P.L., Biggs, P.H., Meier, A.L. and Brown, Z.A. (2000). Regional geochemistry of metals in organic-rich sediments, sawgrass and surface water, from Taylor Slough, Florida. USGS Open-file Report 00–327. US Dept. Interior, US Geological Survey. Reston, VA. 62 pp.Google Scholar
  25. Grieb, T.M., Driscoll, C.T., Gloss, S.P., Schofield, C.L., Bowie, G.L. and Porcella, D.B. (1990). Factors affecting mercury accumulation in fish in the Upper Michigan Peninsula. Environ.Toxicol.Chem. 9, 919–30.Google Scholar
  26. Guentzal, J.L., Landing, W.M., Gill, G.A. and Pollman, C.D. 1998. Mercury and major ions in rainfall, throughfall, and foliage from the Florida Everglades. Sci.Total Environ. 213, 43–51.Google Scholar
  27. Guentzal, J.L., Landing, W.M., Gill, G.A. and Pollman, C.D. (2001). Processes influencing rainfall deposition of mercury in Florida. Environ.Sci.Technol. 35, 863–73.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Harris, R.C. and Bodaly, R.A. (1998). Temperature, growth and dietary effects on fish mercury dynamics in Two Ontario Lakes. Biogeochemistry 40, 175–87.Google Scholar
  29. Hudson, R.J.M., Gherini, S.A., Watras, C.J. and Porcella, D.B. (1994). A mechanistic model of the biogeochemical cycle of mercury in lakes. In C.J. Watras and J.W. Huckabee (eds) Mercury Pollution: Integration and Synthesis, Boca Raton: Lewis Publishers pp. 473–523.Google Scholar
  30. Jernelov, A., Johansson, A., Sorensen, L. and Svenson, A. (1976). Methylmercury degradation in mink. Toxicology 6, 315–21.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Johnson, A.S. (1970). Biology of the raccoon in Alabama. Agricultural Experiment Station. Auburn University. Auburn AL. 148 pp.Google Scholar
  32. Lange, T.H., Royals, H. and Connor, L.L. (1993). Influence of water chemistry on mercury concentration in largemouth bass from Florida lakes. Trans.Am.Fish.Soc. 122, 74–84.Google Scholar
  33. Liang, L. (1998). Determination of arsenic in ambient water at sub-part-per-trillion level by hydride generation Pd coated platform collection and GFAAS detection. Talanta 47, 569–583.Google Scholar
  34. Lindberg, P. and Odsjö, T. (1983). Mercury levels in feathers of peregrine falcon Falco peregrinus compared with total mercury content in some of its prey species in Sweden. Environ.Poll. (Series B) 5, 297–318.Google Scholar
  35. Loftus, W.F., Trexler, J.C. and Jones, R.D. (1998). Mercury transfer through an Everglades aquatic food web. Final Report to the Florida Department of Environmental Protection, December 1998, contract SP-329. Department of Biol. Sci. and SE Environ. Res. Prog., Florida International University, Miami, FL.Google Scholar
  36. Loope, L.L. and Dunevitz, V.L. (1981). Impact of fire exclusion and invasion Schinus terebinthifolius on limestone rockland pine forests of southeastern Florida. National Park Service. South Florida Research Center. Everglades National Park. Rept T-645. 30 pp.Google Scholar
  37. Monteiro, L.R. and Furness, R.W. (1997). Accelerated increase in mercury contamination in North Atlantic mesopelagic food chains as indicated by time series of seabird feathers. Environ.Toxicol.Chem. 16, 2489–93.Google Scholar
  38. Newman, J.R., Zillioux, E.J., Rich, E.R., Robertson, W.B. Jr., Atkeson, T.D. and Whitten, M.L. (1994). Historical contamination mercury in the Florida panther (Felix concolor coryi) and its prey: preliminary results. Poster at the Third Int.Conf.on Mercury as a Global Poll. Whistler, B.C., Canada. 4 pp.Google Scholar
  39. Newton, I., Wyllie, I. and Asher, A. (1993). Long-term trends in organochlorine and mercury residues in some predatory birds in Britain. Environ.Pollut. 79, 143–51.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Roelke, M.E., Schultz, D.P., Facemire, C.F., Sundlof, S.F. and Royals, H.E. (1991). Mercury contamination in Florida panthers. Report to the Florida Panther Interagency Committee. FL Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission, Fish. Res. Lab. PO Box 1903, Eustis FL 33727, 54 pp.Google Scholar
  41. Rood, B.E., Gottgens, J.F., Delfino, J.J., Earle, C.D. and Crisman, T.L. (1995). Mercury accumulation trends in Florida Everglades and Savannas Marsh flooded soils. Water Air Soil Pollut. 80, 981–90.Google Scholar
  42. SAS Institute (1998). StatView. Version 5.Google Scholar
  43. Sheffy, T.B. and St. Amant, J.R. (1982). Mercury burdens in furbearers in Wisconsin. J.Wildlife Management 46, 1117–20.Google Scholar
  44. Stober, Q.J., Jones, R.D. and Scheidt D.W. (1995). Ultra trace level mercury in the Everglades ecosystem, a multimedia canal pilot study. Water, Air, Soil Pollut. 80, 991–1001.Google Scholar
  45. Stober, J., Scheidt, D., Jones, R., Thornton, K., Ambrose R., and France, D. (1996). South Florida Ecosystem Assessment. Monitoring for Adaptive Management: Implications for Ecosystem Restoration (Interim Report). EPA-904-R–96–008. Region 4. USEPA, Athens, GA. 32pp.Google Scholar
  46. USEPA (1993). Wildlife Exposure Factors Handbook. EPA/600/R-93/187. USEPA, 401 M St., Washington. DC. 20460.Google Scholar
  47. USEPA (1997). Mercury Study Report to Congress. EPA 452/R–97–003. USEPA, 401 M St., Washington. DC. 20460.Google Scholar
  48. USEPA (1998). Method 1630 (draft): methyl mercury in water by distillation, aqueous ethylation, purge and trap, and cold vapor atomic fluorescence spectrometry. USEPA, 401 M St., Washington. DC. 20460. 33 pp.Google Scholar
  49. USEPA (1999). Method 1631, Revision B: mercury in water by oxidation, purge and trap, and cold vapor atomic fluorescence spectrometry. EPA-821-R–99–005. USEPA, 401 M St., Washington. DC. 20460. 33pp.Google Scholar
  50. Wagemann, R., Trebacz, E., Boila, G. and Lockhart, W.L. (2000). Mercury species in the liver of ringed seals. Science Total Env. 261, 21–32.Google Scholar
  51. Wren, C.D. (1986). A review of metal accumulation and toxicity in wild mammals. Environ.Research. 40, 210–44.Google Scholar
  52. Wren, C., MacCrimmon, H., Frank, R. and Suda, P. (1980). Total and methyl mercury levels in wild mammals from the precambrian shield area of south central Ontario, Canada. Bull.Environ.Contam.Toxicol. 25, 100–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. B. Porcella
    • 1
  • E. J. Zillioux
    • 2
  • T. M. Grieb
    • 3
  • J. R. Newman
    • 4
  • G. B. West
    • 2
  1. 1.Environmental Science and ManagementUSA
  2. 2.Florida Power and Light Co.USA
  3. 3.Tetra Tech, Inc.USA
  4. 4.Pandion Systems, Inc.USA

Personalised recommendations