Advertisement

Economics of Planning

, Volume 36, Issue 1, pp 1–22 | Cite as

Privatization, Competition, and Budget Constraints: Disciplining Enterprises in Russia

  • John S. Earle
  • Saul Estrin
Article

Abstract

We investigate whether privatization, competitive forces, and the hardening of budget constraints played efficiency-enhancing roles in Russia in the immediate post-privatization period. We find evidence of a positive impact of privatization on labor productivity: a 10% point increase in private share ownership raises real sales per employee by 3–5%. The evidence on product market competition is weaker, depending on model specification. Soft budget constraints are usually found to reduce restructuring but the effect is small and insignificant. We find that in terms of their impacts on productivity, privatization and subsidy reduction are substitutes; privatization and competition (measured as the geographic scope of markets) are complements; and that competition and subsidy reduction are independent.

competition enterprise performance import discipline market structure privatization Russia soft budget constraints subsidies transition 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • John S. Earle
    • 1
    • 2
  • Saul Estrin
    • 2
  1. 1.Upjohn Institute for Employment ResearchKalamazooUSA
  2. 2.Department of Economics and Labor ProjectCentral European UniversityBudapestHungary

Personalised recommendations