Advertisement

Early Childhood Education Journal

, Volume 31, Issue 2, pp 143–150 | Cite as

Technology Education in Hong Kong: International Implications for Implementing the “Eight Cs” in the Early Childhood Curriculum

  • Kin Wai Michael Siu
  • Mei Seung Lam
Article

Keywords

Early Childhood Early Childhood Curriculum International Implication 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Adair, J. (1990). The challenge of innovation. Surrey: Talbot Adair Press.Google Scholar
  2. Banner, J. M., & Cannon, H. C. (1999). The elements of learning. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Barnes, B., Morley, J., & Sayers, S. (2002). Issues in design and tech-nology teaching. London: Routledge/Falmer.Google Scholar
  4. Berk, L. A. E. (2003). Child development (6th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  5. Blackman, J. A. (1995). Technology in early intervention. Gaithersburg, MD: Aspen Publishers.Google Scholar
  6. Bowman, B. (1997). Equity and young children as learners. Proceedings of the Families, Technology, and Education Conference. Available: http://ericeece.org/pubs/books/fte/general/bowman.htmlGoogle Scholar
  7. Brockman, J. (1993). Creativity. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  8. Brown, K. (1998). Education, culture and critical thinking. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  9. Browne, N. (1991). Science and technology in the early years: An equal opportunities approach. Milton Keynes, UK and Philadelphia: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Chard, S. C. (1998). The project approach. New York: Scholastic.Google Scholar
  11. Cleland, D. I., & Ireland, L. R. (2002). Project management: Strategic design and implementation (4th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  12. Coutinho, M. J., & Repp, A. C. (Eds.). (1999). Inclusion: The integra-tion of students with disabilities. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
  13. Department of Education and Science. (1989). Proposals of design and technology for ages 5 to 16. York, UK: Department of Education and Science and the Welsh Office, HMSO.Google Scholar
  14. Derman-Sparks, L. (1989). Anti-bias curriculum: Tools for empower-ing young children. Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.Google Scholar
  15. Eggleston, J. (2001). Teaching design and technology (3rd ed.). Buckingham, UK: Open University.Google Scholar
  16. Fleer, M., & Sukroo, J. (1995). I can make my robot dance: Technology for 3–8 year olds. Carlton, Vic.: Curriculum Corporation.Google Scholar
  17. Forte, I., & Schurr, S. (2003). Curriculum & project planner: For integrating learning styles, thinking, skills & authentic instruction. Nashville, TN: Incentive Publications.Google Scholar
  18. Gilbert, R. (1998) Living with art (5th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  19. Guralnick, M. J. (2001). Early childhood inclusion: Focus on change. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.Google Scholar
  20. Harnqvist, K., & Burgen, A. (1997). Growing up with science: Developing early understanding of science. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers and Academia Europaea.Google Scholar
  21. Haugland, S. W., & Wright, J. L. (1997). Young children and technology: A world of discovery. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
  22. Heckhausen, J. (Ed.). (2000). Motivational psychology of human de-velopment: Developing motivation and motivating development. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  23. Hobart, C., & Frankel, J. (1999). A practical guide to activities for young children. Cheltenham, UK: Stanley Thornes.Google Scholar
  24. Johnston, J. (1996). Early explorations in science. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Kershaw, L., Jones, K., & Sparrow, L. (1994). Computers: Classroom practice and curriculum reform. Perth, Australia: Mathematics, Science and Technology Education Centre, Edith Cowan University.Google Scholar
  26. Mendelowitz, D. M. (1981). Children are artists. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Myer, K. (Ed.) (2000). Whatever happened to equal opportunities in schools?: Gender equality initiatives in education. Buckingham, PA: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  28. National Association for the Education of Young Children. (1994). The adventure begins: Preschool and technology (video recording). Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.Google Scholar
  29. O'Neil, H. F., & Drillings, M. (Eds.). (1994). Motivation: Theory and research. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  30. Pope, R. (2002). Creativity. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  31. Raizen, S. A., Sellwood, P. Todd, R., & Vickers, M. (1995). Technology education in the classroom: Understanding the designed world. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  32. Sekine, K., & Arai, K. (1994). Design team revolution. Portland, OR: Productivity Press.Google Scholar
  33. Siu, K. W. M. (1997). Criticism and theory studies in design and technology teacher education programmes. Curriculum Forum, 7(1), 49–58.Google Scholar
  34. Siu, K. W. M. (2000a). A case study of the difficulties and possibilities for students to initiate their project titles. In K. Volk, W. So, & G. Thomas (Eds.), Science and Technology Education Conference 2000 Proceedings (pp. 112–120). Hong Kong: The Hong Kong Institute of Education.Google Scholar
  35. Siu, K. W. M. (2000b). A study of the relationship between the colour vision deficiency and creativity of design and technology students. The Korean Journal of Thinking and Problem Solving, 10(1), 21–30.Google Scholar
  36. Siu, K. W. M. (2000c). The eight percent of design and technology students in our class. The Journal of Design and Technology Education, 5(1), 20–25.Google Scholar
  37. Siu, K. W. M. (2001). What should be solved? The Korean Journal of Thinking and Problem Solving, 11(2), 9–22.Google Scholar
  38. Siu, K. W. M. (2002a). Impact of new technology on teaching and learning in technology education: Opportunity or threat? (Key-note Address). In E. W. L. Norman (Ed.), DATA International Research Conference 2002 (pp. 29–37). Wellesbourne, UK: The Design and Technology Association.Google Scholar
  39. Siu, K. W. M. (2002b). Meeting the New Needs: Curriculum Develop-ment and Assessment of Technology Subjects. In 25th Anniver-sary Commemorative Album of the Hong Kong Examinations and Assessment Authority (pp. 48–54). Hong Kong: Hong Kong Examinations and Assessment Authority.Google Scholar
  40. Smith, K. A. (2000). Project management and teamwork. Boston: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  41. Umansky, W. (1998). Young children with special needs (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.Google Scholar
  42. Williams, R. (2002). Retooling: A historian confronts technological change. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  43. Wright, J. L., & Shade, D. D. (Eds.). (1994). Young children: Active learners in a technological age. Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young ChildrenGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press, Inc. 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kin Wai Michael Siu
    • 1
  • Mei Seung Lam
    • 2
  1. 1.School of DesignThe Hong Kong Polytechnic UniversityHunghom, KowloonHong Kong
  2. 2.University of Cambridge/The Hong Kong Institute of EducationHong Kong

Personalised recommendations