Advertisement

Environmental Biology of Fishes

, Volume 70, Issue 3, pp 257–272 | Cite as

Reproductive Biology and Protandrous Hermaphroditism in Acanthopagrus latus

  • S. Alex Hesp
  • Ian C. Potter
  • Norman G. Hall
Article

Abstract

Detailed macroscopic and histological studies of the gonads of a full size and age range of Acanthopagrus latus from each season in Shark Bay, Western Australia, demonstrate that this species is a protandrous hermaphrodite in this large subtropical embayment. Although our scheme for the changes that occur in the ovotestes of A. latus during life is not consistent with some of the conclusions drawn for this species elsewhere, it is similar to that of Pollock (1985 J. Fish. Biol. 26: 301–311) for the congeneric Acanthopagrus australis. The ovotestes of males develop from gonads which contain substantial amounts of both testicular and ovarian tissue. The testicular component of the ovotestes of all males regresses markedly after spawning. During the next spawning season, the ovotestes either become gonads in which the testicular zone again predominates and contains spermatids and spermatozoa (functional males), or gonads in which the ovarian zone now predominates and contains mature oocytes (functional females). Once a fish has become a functional female, it remains a female throughout the rest of its life. In Shark Bay, A. latustypically spawns on a limited number of occasions during a short period in late winter and early spring and has determinate fecundity. The mean potential annual fecundity was ca. 2 000 000. The total length of 245 mm, at which, during the spawning period, 50% of A. latus become identifiable as males, is very similar to the current minimum legal length (MLL) of 250 mm, which corresponds to an age of ca. 2.5 years less than that at which 50% of males become females. Thus, although the spawning potential ratio suggests that the present fishing pressure is sustainable, the current MLL should be reviewed if recreational fishing pressure continues to increase.

gonadal changes spawning period fecundity spawning potential ratio 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abol-Munafi, A.B. & S. Umeda. 1994. The gonadal cycle of the yellowfin porgy, Acanthopagrus latus (Houttuyn) reared in the net cage at Tosa Bay, Japan. Suisanzoshoku 42: 135-144.Google Scholar
  2. Abou-Seedo, F.S., S. Dadzie & K.A. Al-Kanaan. 2003. Sexuality, sex change and maturation patterns in the yellowfin seabream, Acanthopagrus latus (Teleostei: Sparidae) (Houttuyn, 1982). J. Appl. Ichthyol. 19: 65-73.Google Scholar
  3. Abu-Hakima, R. 1984. Some aspects of the reproductive biology of Acanthopagrus spp. (Family: Sparidae). J. Fish Biol. 25: 515-526.Google Scholar
  4. Allen, G. 1997. Marine Fishes of Tropical Australia and South-East Asia: A Field Guide for Divers and Anglers, Western Australian Museum. Perth, Australia. 292 pp.Google Scholar
  5. Bannerot, S., W.W. Fox Jr. & J.E. Powers. 1987. Reproductive strategies and the management of snappers and groupers in the Gulf of Mexico and Caribbean. pp. 561-603. In: J.J. Polovina & S. Ralston (ed.) Tropical Snappers and Groupers, Biology and Fisheries Management, Westview Press, Boulder.Google Scholar
  6. Besseau, L. & S. Bruslé-Sicard. 1995. Plasticity of gonad development in hermaphroditic sparids: Ovotestis ontogeny in a protandric species, Lithognathus mormyrus. Environ. Biol. Fish. 43: 255-267.Google Scholar
  7. Buxton, C.D. 1992. The application of yield-per-recruit models to two South African sparid reef species, with special consideration to sex change. Fish. Res. 15: 1-16.Google Scholar
  8. Buxton, C.D. & P.A. Garratt. 1990. Alternative reproductive styles in seabreams (Pisces: Sparidae). Environ. Biol. Fish. 28: 113-124.Google Scholar
  9. Chang, C.-W., C.-C. Hsu, Y.-T. Wang & W.-N. Tzeng. 2002. Early life history of Acanthopagrus latus and A. schlegeli (Sparidae) on the western coast of Taiwan: Temporal and spatial partitioning of recruitment. Mar. Freshw. Res. 53: 411-417.Google Scholar
  10. Conover, D.O. 1992. Seasonality and the scheduling of life history at different latitudes. J. Fish Biol. 41: 161-178.Google Scholar
  11. Cushing, D.H. 1990. Plankton production and year-class strength in fish populations: An update of the match/mismatch hypothesis. Adv. Mar. Biol. 26: 249-293.Google Scholar
  12. D'Ancona, U. 1949. Ermafroditismo ed intersessualita nei Telestei. Experientia 5: 381-389.Google Scholar
  13. de Vlaming, V.L. 1983. Oocyte development patterns and hormonal involvements among teleosts. pp. 176-199. In: J.C. Rankin, T.J. Pitcher & R.T. Duggan (ed.) Control Processes in Fish Physiology, Croom Helm, Beckenham.Google Scholar
  14. Goodyear, C.P. 1993. Spawning stock biomass per recruit in fisheries management. Foundation and current use. Can. Spec. Publ. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 120: 67-81.Google Scholar
  15. Hall, N.G., S.A. Hesp & I.C. Potter. (in press). A Bayesian approach for overcoming inconsistencies in mortality estimates, using, as an example, data for Acanthopagrus latus. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci.Google Scholar
  16. Hesp, S.A. & I.C. Potter. 2003. Reproductive biology of the tarwhine Rhabdosargus sarba (Sparidae) in three different environments on the west coast of Australia. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. U.K. 83: 1333-1346.Google Scholar
  17. Hunter, J.R., N.C.H. Lo & R.J.H. Leong. 1985. Batch fecundity in multiple spawning fishes. pp. 67-78. In: R. Lasker (ed.) An Egg Production Method for Estimating Spawning Biomass of Pelagic Fish: Application to the Northern Anchovy (Engraulis mordax), U.S. Department of Commerce, NOAA Technical Report NMFS 36.Google Scholar
  18. Hussain, N.A. & M.A.S. Abdullah. 1977. The length-weight relationship, spawning season and food habits of six commercial fishes in Kuwait waters. Ind. J. Fish. 24: 181-194.Google Scholar
  19. Kinoshita, Y. 1939. Studies on the sexuality of genus Sparus (Teleostei). J. Sci., Hiroshima University Series B Division 1. Zoology 7: 25-37.Google Scholar
  20. Laevastu, T. 1965. Manual of Methods in Fisheries Biology. FAO, Rome. 51 pp.Google Scholar
  21. Lee, J.U. & A.F. Al-baz. 1989. Assessment of fish stocks exploited by fish traps in the Arabian Gulf area. Asian Fish. Sci. 2: 213-231.Google Scholar
  22. Mace, P.M. 2001. A new role for MSY in single-species and ecosystem approaches to fisheries stock assessment and management. Fish Fish. 2: 2-32.Google Scholar
  23. Mace, P.M. & M.P. Sissenwine. 1993. How much spawning per recruit is enough? pp. 101-118. In: S.J. Smith, J.J. Hunt & D. Rivard (ed.) Risk Evaluation and Biological Reference Points for Fisheries Management. Can. Spec. Publ. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 120.Google Scholar
  24. Milton, D.A., D. Die, C. Tenakanae & S. Swales. 1998. Selectivity for barramundi (Lates calcarifer) in the Fly River, Papua New Guinea: Implications for managing gill-net fisheries on protandrous fishes. Mar. Freshw. Res. 49: 499-506.Google Scholar
  25. Pollock, B.R. 1985. The reproductive cycle of yellowfin bream, Acanthopagrus australis (Günther), with particular reference to protandrous sex inversion. J. Fish Biol. 26: 301-311.Google Scholar
  26. Punt, A.E., P.A. Garratt & A.Govender. 1993. On an approach for applying per-recruit methods to a protogynous hermaphrodite, with an illustration for the slinger Chrysoblephus puniceus (Pisces: Sparidae). S. Afr. J. Mar. Sci. 13: 109-119.Google Scholar
  27. Sadovy, Y. & D.Y. Shapiro. 1987. Criteria for the diagnosis of hermaphroditism in fishes. Copeia 1987: 136-156.Google Scholar
  28. Sarre, G.A. 1999. Hermaphroditism of Acanthopagrus butcheri in the Swan River Estuary (Chapter 6). In: Age Composition, Growth Rates, Reproductive Biology and Diets of the Black Bream Acanthopagrus butcheri in Four Estuaries and a Coastal Saline Lake in South-western Australia, Ph.D. Thesis, Murdoch University, Western Australia, 130 pp.Google Scholar
  29. Sarre, G.A. & I.C. Potter. 1999. Comparisons between the reproductive biology of black bream Acanthopagrus butcheri (Teleostei: Sparidae) in four estuaries with widely differing characteristics. Int. J. Salt Lake Res. 8: 179-210.Google Scholar
  30. Shaw, J. 2000. Fisheries environmental management review. Gascoyne. Fisheries Environmental Management Review No 1. Department of Fisheries, Western Australia. 229 pp.Google Scholar
  31. Tobin, A.J., M.J. Sheaves & B.W. Molony. 1997. Evidence of protandrous hermaphroditism in the tropical sparid Acanthopagrus berda. J. Fish Biol. 50: 22-33.Google Scholar
  32. Travers, M.J. & I.C. Potter. 2002. Factors influencing the characteristics of fish assemblages in a large subtropical marine embayment. J. Fish Biol. 61: 764-784.Google Scholar
  33. Wallace, R.A. & K. Selman. 1989. Cellular and dynamic aspects of oocyte growth in teleosts. Am. Zool. 21: 325-343.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. Alex Hesp
    • 1
  • Ian C. Potter
    • 1
  • Norman G. Hall
    • 1
  1. 1.Centre for Fish and Fisheries Research, School of Biological Sciences and BiotechnologyMurdoch UniversityMurdochAustralia

Personalised recommendations