Environmental Biology of Fishes

, Volume 70, Issue 2, pp 95–105 | Cite as

Interdemic variation in the foraging ecology of the African cyprinid, Barbus neumayeri



In the African cyprinid, Barbus neumayeri, populations from hypoxic waters have larger gills than populations from well-oxygenated streams. Differences in trophic morphology and feeding performance between these populations suggest a reduction in feeding efficiency in large-gilled fish that may reflect spatial constraints of the gills. However, this variation may also reflect interdemic variation in diets. In this study, we describe patterns of variation in diet, gut morphology, and prey availability for populations of B. neumayeri from swamp (low-oxygen) and stream (high-oxygen) sites in Kibale National Park, Uganda. Our results indicate that B. neumayeri are omnivorous, feeding primarily on benthic prey items; however, diets differed among swamp and stream sites for certain prey types. The observed dietary differences do not provide direct support for predictions based on variation in trophic musculature; hard-bodied prey were more common in low-oxygen sites. Prey availability also differed among sites; in particular, insect abundance and richness was generally lower in the swamp sites. Gut length was longer in one of the four populations, but did not conform to expectations based on diet differences. Condition and growth rates did not differ between populations from hypoxic and well-oxygenated sites, despite observed differences in prey availability and diet, suggesting that B. neumayeri may be distributed in a way that equalizes fitness among populations in different habitats.

wetlands diet interdemic variation East Africa papyrus 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Barel, C.D.N. 1983. Towards a constructional morphology of cichlid fishes (Teleostei, Perciformes). Neth. J. Zool. 33: 357–424.Google Scholar
  2. Beadle, L.C. 1981. The Inland Waters of Tropical Africa. An Introduction to Tropical Limnology, Longman, London. 475 pp.Google Scholar
  3. Bischoff, A. & J. Freyhof. 1999. Seasonal shifts in day-time resource use of 0+ barbel, Barbus barbus. Environ. Biol. Fish. 56: 199–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Carter, G.S. 1955. The Papyrus Swamps of Uganda, Heffer, Cambridge. 25 pp.Google Scholar
  5. Cech, J.J. & M.J. Massingill. 1995. Tradeoffs between respiration and feeding in Sacramento blackfish, Orthodon microlepidotus. Environ. Biol. Fish. 44: 157–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chapman, L.J. & K.F. Liem. 1995. Papyrus swamps and the respiratory ecology of Barbus neumayeri. Environ. Biol. Fish. 44: 183–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chapman, L.J., L.S. Kaufman, C.A. Chapman & F.E. McKenzie. 1995. Hypoxia tolerance in twelve species of East African cichlids: Potential for low-oxygen refugia in Lake Victoria. Conserv. Biol. 9: 1274–1288.Google Scholar
  8. Chapman, L.J., C.A. Chapman & T.L. Crisman. 1998. Limnological observations of a papyrus swamp in Uganda: Implications for fish faunal structure and diversity. Int. Assoc. Theoret. Appl. Limnol. 26: 1821–1826.Google Scholar
  9. Chapman, L.J., C.A. Chapman, D.A. Brazeau, B. McLaughlin & M. Jordan. 1999. Papyrus swamps, hypoxia and faunal diversification: Variation among populations of Barbus neumayeri. J. Fish. Biol. 54: 310–327.Google Scholar
  10. Chapman, L.J., F. Galis & J. Shinn. 2000. Phenotypic plasticity and the possible role of genetic assimilation: Hypoxia-induced trade-offs in the morphological traits of an African cichlid. Ecol. Lett. 3: 387–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Corbet, P.S. 1961. The food of non-cichlid fishes in Lake Victoria basin with remarks on their evolution and adaptation to lacustrine conditions. Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond. 136: 1–101.Google Scholar
  12. Encina, L. & C. Granado-Lorencio. 1997. Food habits and food resource partitioning in three coexisting Barbus species. Folia Zool. 46: 325–336.Google Scholar
  13. Fretwell, S.D. & H.L. Lucas. 1970. On territorial behavior and other factors influencing habitat distribution in birds I. Theoretical development. Acta Biotheor. 19: 16–36.Google Scholar
  14. Giannico, G.R. & M.C. Healey. 1999. Ideal free distribution theory as a tool to examine juvenile coho salmon (Oncorhyncus kisutch) habitat choice under different conditions of food abundance and cover. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 56: 2362–2373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Grand, T.C. & L.M. Dill. 1999. Predation risk, unequal competitors and the ideal free distribution. Evol. Ecol. Res. 1: 389–409.Google Scholar
  16. Greenwood, P.H. 1962. A revision of certain Barbus (Pisces, Cyprinidae) from east, central and south Africa. Bull. Br. Mus. Nat. Hist. (Zoology) 8: 151–208.Google Scholar
  17. Greenwood, P.H. 1966. The Fishes of Uganda, The Uganda Society, Kampala. 131 pp.Google Scholar
  18. Horn, M.H. 1989. Biology of marine herbivorous fishes. Oceanogr. Mar. Biol. 27: 167–272.Google Scholar
  19. Hugeny, B. & M. Pouilly. 1999. Morphological correlates of diet in an assemblage of West African freshwater fishes. J. Fish Biol. 54: 1310–1325.Google Scholar
  20. Meyer, A. 1987. Phenotypic plasticity and heterochrony in Cichlasoma managuense (Pisces, Cichlidae) and their implications for speciation in cichlid fishes. Evolution 41: 1357–1369.Google Scholar
  21. Milinski, M. 1987. Competition for non-depleting resources: The ideal free distribution in sticklebacks. pp. 363–388. In: A.C. Kamil, J.R. Krebs & H.R. Pulliam (ed.) Foraging Behaviour, Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar
  22. Mittelbach, G.G., C.W. Osenberg & P.C. Wainwright. 1999. Variation in feeding morphology between pumpkinseed populations: Phenotypic plasticity or evolution? Evol. Ecol. Res. 1: 111–128.Google Scholar
  23. Montgomery, W.L. 1977. Diet and gut morphology in fishes, with special reference to the monkeyface prickleback, Cebdichthys violaceus (Stichaeidae: Blennioidei). Copeia 1: 178–182.Google Scholar
  24. Olowo, J.P. & L.J. Chapman. 1996. Papyrus swamps and variation in respiratory behavior of the African fish Barbus neumayeri. Afr. J. Ecol. 34: 211–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Power, M.E. 1984. Habitat quality and the distribution of algaegrazing catfish in a Panamanian stream. J. Anim. Ecol. 53: 357–374.Google Scholar
  26. Robinson, B.W., D.S. Wilson & G.O. Shea. 1996. Trade-offs of ecological specialization: An intraspecific comparison of pumpkinseed sunfish phenotypes. Ecology 77: 170–178.Google Scholar
  27. Ruzzante, D.E., S.J. Walde, V.E. Cussac, P.J. Macchi & M.F. Alonso. 1998. Trophic polymorphism, habitat, and diet segregation in Percichthyes trucha (Pisces: Percichthyidae) in the Andes. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 65: 191–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Schaack, S. & L.J. Chapman. 2003. Interdemic variation in the African cyprinid, Barbus neumayeri: Correlations among hypoxia, morphology, and feeding performance. Can. J. Zool. 81: 430–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Schluter, D. 1995. Adaptive radiation in sticklebacks-trade-offs in feeding performance and growth. Ecology 76: 82–90.Google Scholar
  30. Sibbing, F.A. & L.A.G. Nagelkerke. 2001. Resource partitioning by Lake Tana barbs predicted from fish morphometrics and prey characteristics. Rev. Fish Biol. Fish. 10: 393–437.Google Scholar
  31. Starck, J.M. 1999. Structural flexibility of the gastro-intestinal tract of vertebrates-implications for evolutionary morphology. Zool. Anz. 238: 87–101.Google Scholar
  32. Suyehiro, Y. 1941. A study of the digestive system and feeding habits of fish. Jpn. J. Zool. 10: 1–303.Google Scholar
  33. Thompson, K. 1976.Swamp development in the headwaters of the White Nile. pp. 177–196. In: J. Rzoska (ed.) The Nile, Biology of an Ancient River, Dr W. Junk, The Hague.Google Scholar
  34. Turingan, R.G., P.C. Wainwright & D.A. Hensley. 1995. Interpopulation variation in prey use and feeding biomechanics in caribbean triggerfishes. Oecologia 102: 296–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wainwright, P.C. & B.A. Richard. 1995. Predicting patterns of prey use from morphology of fishes. Environ. Biol. Fish. 44: 97–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. West-Eberhard, M.J. 1989. Phenotypic plasticity and the origins of diversity. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 20: 249–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Witte, F., C.D.N. Barel & J.C. Hoogerhoud. 1990. Phenotypic plasticity of anatomical structures and its ecomorphological significance. Neth. J. Zool. 40: 278–298.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of ZoologyUniversity of FloridaGainesvilleU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations