Environmental Biology of Fishes

, Volume 68, Issue 4, pp 381–389 | Cite as

Variation in Habitat use by Juvenile Acadian Redfish, Sebastes fasciatus

  • Peter J. Auster
  • James Lindholm
  • Page C. Valentine


A basic paradigm in behavioral ecology is that organisms expand their distribution as preferred sites become saturated with individuals that reduce the availability of resources (e.g., shelter, prey) on a per capita basis. Previous fish community studies at Stellwagen Bank National Marine Sanctuary have shown that juvenile Acadian redfish Sebastes fasciatus (<20 cm total length; TL) were primarily associated with boulder reefs that have deep interstices amongst the boulders; and that redfish expanded their distribution to adjacent gravel habitats when local abundance on reefs was high. Multibeam and sidescan sonar surveys in Stellwagen Basin (primarily a cohesive mud seafloor) have shown that discrete small areas of the basin floor are composed of mud draped gravel and partially buried boulders. Linear video transects using remotely operated vehicles and a video/photographic equipped grab sampler across five of these sites in 1997 showed that exposed boulders do not have crevices along their lower margins and are surrounded by dense patches of cerianthid anemones, Cerianthus borealis. These anemone patches are not present on the surrounding mud seafloor. Video image data showed that late juvenile redfish (11–20 cm TL) occurred on boulder reefs as well as in the dense cerianthid patches but not on unstructured mud habitat (without cerianthid anemones). Comparisons of boulder reef and cerianthid habitats in 1998 showed that early demersal phase (0-year) redfish (0–10 cm TL) occurred only on reefs but late juveniles occurred both on the reefs and in dense cerianthid habitats. Adult size classes (>20 cm TL) also occurred in dense cerianthid habitats. Two explanations for these distributions can be advanced. The simplest is that redfish use both boulder and cerianthid habitats on an encounter basis, regardless of habitat saturation or predation pressure. Alternatively, boulder reefs serve as recruitment habitats and cerianthid habitats serve as a conduit for redfish moving away from saturated boulder reef sites, essentially serving as elements of a 'redfish pump'.

boulder reefs cerianthid anemones video remotely operated vehicle habitat conservation 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Atkinson, D.B. 1989. Diel movements of beaked redfish and the implications of these for stratified random bottom trawl estimates of biomass and abundance. N. Am. J. Fish. Manag. 9: 163–170.Google Scholar
  2. Auster, P.J., C. Michalopoulos, P.C. Valentine & R.J. Malatesta. 1998. Delineating and monitoring habitat management units in a temperate deep-water marine protected area. pp. 169–185. In: N.W.P. Munro & J.H.M. Willison (ed.) Linking Protected Areas with Working Landscapes, Conserving Biodiversity, Science and Management of Protected Areas Association, Wolfville.Google Scholar
  3. Auster, P.J. 2002. Representation of biological diversity of the Gulf of Maine region at Stellwagen Bank National Marine Sanctuary (Northwest Atlantic): Patterns of fish diversity and assemblage composition. pp. 1096–1125. In: S. Bondrup-Nielson, N.W.P. Munro, G. Nelson, J.H.M. Willison, T.B. Herman & P. Eagles (ed.) Managing Protected Areas in a Changing World, Science and Management of Protected Areas Association, Wolfville.Google Scholar
  4. Barr, B. 1995. The U.S. National Marine Sanctuary Program and its role in preserving sustainable fisheries. pp. 165–173. In: N. Shackell & J.H.M. Willison (ed.) Marine Protected Areas and Sustainable Fisheries, Science and Management of Protected Areas Association, Wolfville.Google Scholar
  5. Blackwood, D. & K. Parolski. 2001. Seabed observation and sampling system. Sea Technol. 43: 39–40, 43 pp.Google Scholar
  6. High, W.L. 1998. Observations of a scientist/diver on fishing technology and fisheries biology. U.S. National Marine Fisheries Service, Alaska Fisheries Science Center, Seattle, Washington. AFSC Processed Rep. 98–01, 48 pp.Google Scholar
  7. Hochberg, Y. 1988. A sharper Bonferroni procedure for multiple tests of significance. Biometrika 75: 800–802.Google Scholar
  8. Kelly, G.F. & A.M. Barker. 1961a. Vertical distribution of young redfish in the Gulf of Maine. Int. Comm. Northwest Atl. Fish. (ICNAF) Spec. Pub. 3: 220–233.Google Scholar
  9. Kelly, G.F. & A.M. Barker. 1961b. Observations on the behavior, growth, and migration of redfish at Eastport, Maine. Int. Comm. Northwest Atl. Fish. (ICNAF) Spec. Pub. 3: 263–275.Google Scholar
  10. Love, M.S., M. Yoklavich & L. Thorsteinson. 2002. The Rock-fishes of the Northeast Pacific. University of California Press, Berkeley. 404 pp.Google Scholar
  11. Mayo, R.K. 1998. Redfish. In: S.H. Clark (ed.) Status of Fishery Resources off the Northeastern United States for 1998. NOAA Tech. Memo NMFS-NE-115: 57–59.Google Scholar
  12. Mayo, R.K., J. Burnett, T.D. Smith & C.A. Muchant. 1990. Growth-maturation interactions of Acadian redfish (Sebastes fasciatus Storer) in the Gulf of Maine-Georges Bank region of the northwest Atlantic. J. Cons. Int. Explor. Mer 46: 287–305.Google Scholar
  13. Murawski, S.A. 1993. Climate change and marine fish distributions: Forecasting from historical analogy. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 122: 647–657.Google Scholar
  14. NMFS. 2002. Re-evaluation of biological reference points for New England groundfish. NEFSC Reference Document 02–04. National Marine Fisheries Service, Northeast Fisheries Science Center, Woods Hole, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  15. Sandeman, E.J. 1969. Age determination and growth rate of redfish, Sebastes sp., from selected areas around Newfoundland. Int. Comm. Northwest Atl. Fish. (ICNAF) Res. Bull. 6: 79–106.Google Scholar
  16. Scott, J.S. 1982. Selection of bottom type by groundfishes of the Scotian Shelf. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 39: 943–947.Google Scholar
  17. Scott, W.B. & M.G. Scott. 1988. Atlantic Fishes of Canada. Canadian Bulletin of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 219. 731 pp.Google Scholar
  18. Shepard, A.N., R.B. Theroux, R.A. Cooper & J.R. Uzmann. 1987. Ecology of Ceriantharia (Coelenterata, Anthozoa) of the northwest Atlantic. Fish. Bull. U.S. 84: 625–646.Google Scholar
  19. Uzmann, J.R., R.A. Cooper, R.B. Theroux & R.L. Wigley. 1978. Synoptic comparison of three sampling techniques for estimating abundance and distribution of selected megafauna: Submersible versus camera sled versus otter trawl. Mar. Fish. Rev. 39: 11–19.Google Scholar
  20. Valentine, P.C. & E.A. Schmuck. 1995. Geological mapping of biological habitats on Georges Bank and Stellwagen Bank, Gulf of Maine region. pp. 31–40. In: Applications of Sidescan Sonar and Laserline Systems in Fisheries Research, Alaska Department of Fish and Game, Special Publication No. 9.Google Scholar
  21. Valentine, P.C., J.R. Uzmann & R.A. Cooper. 1980. Geology and biology of oceanographer submarine canyon. Mar. Geol. 38: 283–312.Google Scholar
  22. Valentine, P.C., T.J. Middleton & S.J. Fuller 2001. Sun-illuminated topography, and backscatter intensity of the Stellwagen Bank National Marine Sanctuary region off Boston, Massachusetts. U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 00–410, scale 1: 60,000, 1 CD-ROM.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter J. Auster
    • 1
  • James Lindholm
    • 1
  • Page C. Valentine
    • 2
  1. 1.National Undersea Research CenterUniversity of Connecticut at Avery PointGrotonU.S.A.
  2. 2.U.S. Geological Survey, Woods HoleU.S.A

Personalised recommendations