Digestive Diseases and Sciences

, Volume 49, Issue 7–8, pp 1123–1127

Magnifying Endoscopy with Indigo Carmine Contrast for Differential Diagnosis of Neoplastic and Nonneoplastic Colonic Polyps

  • Ming-Yao Su
  • Yu-Pin Ho
  • Pang-Chi Chen
  • Cheng-Tang Chiu
  • Cheng-Shyong Wu
  • Chen-Ming Hsu
  • Shui-Yi Tung
Article

Abstract

This study describes the feasibility of magnifying colonoscopy with indigo carmine dye contrast to distinguish neoplastic and nonneoplastic colonic polyps. This study sampled consecutive patients undergoing colonoscopy using an Olympus CF240ZI from January to October 2000 at Chang-Gung Memorial Hospital, Lin-Kou Medical Center. This study analyzed a total of 270 polyps. Indigo carmine (0.2%) was sprayed directly on the mucosa surface before observing the crypts using a magnifying colonoscope (1.5×–100×). The pit patterns were described using the classification proposed by Kudo. Finally, polypectomy or biopsy was performed for histological diagnosis. The study identified 155 adenomas, 99 hyperplastic polyps, 9 adenocarcinomas, and 7 other nonneoplastic lesions (harmatoma, inflammatory polyps, and mucosal tag). The pit pattern was analyzed for all lesions. Further classification into neoplastic (adenoma and adenocarcinoma) and nonneoplastic (hyperplastic and others) polyps revealed 156 neoplastic and 14 nonneoplastic polyps among the type III to type V pits and 92 nonneoplastic and 8 neoplastic polyps among the type I and II pits. The sensitivity of type III to type V pits in detecting neoplastic polyps was 95.1%, with a specificity of 86.8% and diagnostic accuracy of 91.9%. The positive likelihood ratio was 7.3, and the negative likelihood ratio was 0.06. Magnifying colonoscopy with indigo carmine dye contrast provides morphological detail that correlates well with polyp histology. Small flat lesions with typical type II pit pattern should have minimal neoplastic risk, thus endoscopic resection is not necessary.

magnifying endoscopy indigo carmine colon polyp 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.
    Kudo S, Hirota S, Nakajima T, et al.: Colorectal tumors and pit pattern, J Clin pathol 47:880–885, 1994Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Shui-Yi Tung, Cheng-Shyong Wu, Ming-Yao Su: Magnifying colonoscopy in differentiating neoplastic from nonneoplastic colorectal lesions, Am J Gastroenterol 96:2628–2632, 2001Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Morson BC: Evolution of cancer of the colon and rectum. Cancer 34:845–850, 1974Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Schottenfeld D, Winawer SJ: Large intestine. In Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention. D Schottenfeld, J Fraumani Jr (eds). Philadelphia, W. B. Saunders, 1982, pp 703–727Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Atkin WS, Morson BC, Cuzick J: Long-term risk of colorectal cancer after excision of rectosigmoid adenomas. N Engl J Med 326:658–662, 1992Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Deyhle P, Jargiader F, Jenny S: A method of endoscopic electroresection of sessile colonic polyps [letter]. Endoscopy 5:38, 1973Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kudo S: Endoscopic mucosal resection of flat and depressed types of early colorectal cancer. Endoscopy 25:455–461, 1993Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wadas DD, Sanowski RA: Complications of the hot biopsy forceps technique. Gastrointest Endosc 34:32–37, 1988Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Waye JD: Management of complications of colonoscopic polypectomy. Gastroenterologist 1:158–164, 1993Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jentchura D, Raute M, Winter J, et al.: Complications in endoscopy of the lower gastrointestinal tract. Therapy and prognosis. Surg Endose 8:672–676, 1994Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Yokota T, Sugihara K, Yoshida S: Endoscopic mucosal resection for colorectal neoplastic lesions. Dis Colon Rectum 37:1108–1111, 1994Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lieberman DA, Smith FW: Frequency of isolated proximal colonic polyps among patients referred for colonoscopy. Arch Intern Med 148:473–475, 1988Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Payne RA: The incidence and clinical significance of rectal polyps. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 58:241–242, 1976Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Chapui PH, Dent OF, Goulston KJ: Clinical accuracy in diagnosis of small polyps using the flexible fiberoptic sigmoidoscopy. Dis Colon Rectum 25:669–672, 1982Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Neale AV, Demers RY, Budev H, Scott RO: Physician accuracy in diagnosing colorectal polyps. Dis Colon Rectum 30:247–250, 1987Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bond JH: Is the small colorectal polyp clinically diminutive? Gastrointest Endose 39:592–593, 1993Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lane N, Lev R: Observation on the origin of adenomatous epithelium of the colon: serial section studies of minute polyps in familial polyposis. Cancer 16:751–754, 1963Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Arthur JF: Structure and significance of neopastic nodules in rectal mucosa. J Clin pathol 21:735–743, 1968Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Blue MG, Sivak MV, Achkar E, Matzen R, Stahl RS: Hyperplastic polyps seen at sigmoidoscopy are markers for additional adenomas seen at colonoscopy. Gastroenterology 100:564–566, 1991Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Opelka FG, Timmcke AE, Gathright JB, Ray Je, Hicks TC: Diminutive colonic polyps: an indication for colonoscopy. Dis Colon Rectum 35:178–181, 1992Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kasita M, Cantero D, Okita K: Endoscopic diagnosis and resection for flat adenoma with severe dysplasia.AmJ Gastroenterol 88:1421–1423, 1993Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Matsumoto T, Iida M, KuwanoY, Tada S, Yao T, Fujishima M: Small nonpolypid neoplastic lesions of the colon: endoscopic features with emphasis on their progression. Gastrointest Endosc 41:135–140, 1995Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sakaki N, Iida Y, Okazaki Y, et al.: Magnifying endoscopic observation of the gastric mucosa, particularly in patients with atrophic gastritis. Endoscopy 10:269–274, 1978Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Tada M, Misaki F, Kawai K: A new approach to the observation of minute changes of the colonic mucosa by means of magnifying colonoscope, type CF-MB-M (Olympus). Gastrointest Endosc 24:146–147, 1978Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Nishizawa M, Okata T, Sato F, et al.: A clinicopathological study of minute polypoid lesions of the colon based on magnifying fibercolonoscopy and microscopy. Endoscopy 12:124–129, 1980Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Tada M, Suyama Y, Shimizu T: Magnifying observations of the colonic mucosa by means of a newly developed colonoscope type CF-HM (Olympus). Gastrointest Endosc 21:1178–1189, 1979Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ida K, Tada M: Chromoscopy. In Gastroenterologic Endoscopy. M Sivak (ed). Philadelphia, Saunders, 1987, pp 203–220Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Takemoto T, Sakaki N: High-magnification endoscopy. InGastroenterologic Endoscopy. M Sivak (ed). Philadelphia, Saunders, 1987, pp 220–230Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Mitooka H, Fujimoro T, Ohno S, Morimoto S, Nakahima T, Ohmoto A, Miyamoto M, Oh T, Saeki S: Chromoscopy of the colon using indigo carmine dye with electrolyte lavage solution. Gastrointest Endosc 38:373–374, 1992Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Mitooka H, Shirakawa K, Naka Y, Makino S, Fujimoro T, Maeda S: Differentiation of diminutive neoplastic polyps from non-neoplastic polyps by the pit patterns (PP) observed by magnifying colonoscope (abstr). Gastrointest Endosc 40:95, 1994Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    George LL, Van Stolk RU, Brzezinsky A, Seidner DL: Evaluation of indigo carmine dye spray as a diagnostic tool in assessing diminutive polyps found at screening sigmoidscopy (abstr). Gastrointest Endosc 40:93, 1994Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ming-Yao Su
    • 1
  • Yu-Pin Ho
    • 1
  • Pang-Chi Chen
    • 1
  • Cheng-Tang Chiu
    • 1
  • Cheng-Shyong Wu
    • 1
  • Chen-Ming Hsu
    • 1
  • Shui-Yi Tung
    • 1
  1. 1.The Digestive Therapeutic Endoscopic Center, Department of Gastroenterology, Lin-Kou Medical CenterChang-Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang-Gung UniversityTaoyuanTaiwan

Personalised recommendations