Critical Criminology

, Volume 12, Issue 2, pp 157–178 | Cite as

Forensic DNA Sampling and the England and Wales National DNA Database: A Sceptical Approach

  • Carole Mccartney

Abstract

This paper explores possible implications of the rapid expansion of the England and Wales National DNA Database (NDNAD), and the current DNA sampling of offenders and the retention of samples. A precis of the justifications enunciated for the NDNAD is followed by a sceptic's rebuttal and wider analysis of the impact of the growth of forensic DNA testing. It is contended that the expansion of forensic DNA testing should be considered a response within the risk society to the problem of criminal detection, where “risky populations” will have their DNA held permanently by the State for the prevention and early detection of crime. As with any new technology, new “risks” are created, including not only error, improper access and disclosure and “function creep” but the potential creation of a “suspect society” with forensic DNA technology co-opted into mass surveillance and social control mechanisms.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alldridge, P., Berkhout-Van Poelgeest, S. and Williams, K. (1995). DNA profiling and the use of expert scientific witnesses in criminal proceedings. In P. Fennell, C. Harding, N. Jorg and B. Swart (eds.), Criminal Justice in Europe: A Comparative Study. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  2. Bereano, P. (1992). The Impact of DNA-based identification systems on civil liberties. In P. Billings (ed.), DNA On Trial: Genetic Identification and Criminal Justice. Cold Spring Harbor: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.Google Scholar
  3. Blake, E.T. (1989). Scientific and legal issues raised by DNA analysis. In J. Ballantyne, G. Sensabaugh and J. Witowski (eds.), DNA Technology and Forensic Science. Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.Google Scholar
  4. Briody, M. (2002). The effects of DNA evidence on sexual offence cases in court. Current Issues in Criminal Justice 14(2), 159–181.Google Scholar
  5. Choongh, S. (1998). Policing the dross: A social disciplinary model of policing. British Journal of Criminology 38, 623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Clarke, R. (1994). Dataveillance: Delivering 1984. In L. Green and R. Guinery (eds.), Framing Technology: Society, Choice and Change. Sydney, Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  7. Dennis, C. (2003). Error reports threaten to unravel databases of mitochondrial DNA. Nature, February 20, 773.Google Scholar
  8. Dinerstein, D. (2001). In Criminal Law and DNA Science, 51 American University Law Review 401.Google Scholar
  9. Easton, S. (1991). Bodily samples and the privilege against self-incrimination. Criminal Law Review 18–29.Google Scholar
  10. Ericson and Haggarty, (1997). Policing the Risk Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Fitzpatrick, B. and Taylor, N. (2001). Human rights and the discretionary exclusion of evidence. Journal of Criminal Law65(4), 349–359.Google Scholar
  12. Fox, R. (2001). Someone to watch over us: Back to the panopticon? Criminal Justice 1(3), 251–276.Google Scholar
  13. Garfinkel, S. (2000). Database Nation: The Death of Privacy in the 21st Century. Sebastopol, CA: O'Reilly.Google Scholar
  14. Giddens, A. (1998). Risk society: the context of British Politics. In J. Franklin (ed.), The Politics of Risk Society. Oxford: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  15. Grabosky, P. (1998). Technology and Crime Control. Trends and Issues in Crime and Criminal Justice, No.78. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology.Google Scholar
  16. Hillyard, P. and Gordon, D. (1999). Arresting statistics: The drift to informal justice in England and Wales. Journal of Law and Society, 26, 502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. HMIC (2000). On the Record: A Thematic Inspection Report. Report of Her Majesty's Inspectorate of Constabulary. London: Home Office.Google Scholar
  18. HMIC (2002). Under the Microscope-Refocused. Report of Her Majesty's Inspectorate of Constabulary. London: Home Office.Google Scholar
  19. Hudson, B. (1996). Understanding Justice. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Hudson, R. (1997). DNA Profiling. New Law Journal 127.Google Scholar
  21. Human Genetics Commission (2002). Inside Information: Balancing Interests in the Use of Personal Genetic Data. Report by the Human Genetics Commission.Google Scholar
  22. Jones, R. (2001). Digital Rule: Punishment Control and Technology. Punishment and Society 2(1), 5–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lyon, D. (1991). Bentham's Panopticon: From Moral Architecture to Electronic Surveillance. Queens Quarterly 98(3).Google Scholar
  24. Lyon. D. (2003). Surveillance technology and surveillance society. In T. Misa, P. Brey and A. Feenberg (eds.), Modernity and Technology. MIT Press: London.Google Scholar
  25. Kemshall, H. (2003). Understanding Risk in Criminal Justice. Open University Press: Berkshire.Google Scholar
  26. Kimmelman, J. (2000). Risking ethical insolvency: A survey of trends in criminal DNA databanking. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 28, 209–221.Google Scholar
  27. Maguire, M. (2000). Policing by risks and targets: Some dimensions and implications of intelligence-led crime control. Policing and Society 9, 315–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Martin, P.D., Schmittet. H. and Schneider P. (2001). A Brief History of the formation of DNA databases in forensic science within Europe. Forensic science International 119, 225–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Marx, G. (2001). Technology and social control: The search for the elusive silver bullet. International Encyclopaedia of the Social and Behavioural Sciences 5.Google Scholar
  30. Marx, G. (2002). What's New about the New surveillance? Surveillance and Society 1(1), 9–29.Google Scholar
  31. Matthews, R. (2002), Crime and control in late modernity. Theoretical Criminology 6(2), 217–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Morris, N. (1994). Dangerousness and incapacitation. In A. Duff and D. Garland (eds.), A Reader on Punishment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Pratt, J. (2000). Dangerousness and modern society. In M. Brown and J. Pratt (eds.), Dangerous Offenders: Punishment and Social Order. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  34. Pugilese, J. (1999). Identity in question: A grammatology of DNA & forensic genetics. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law 12, 419–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Redmayne, M. (1998). The DNA database: Civil liberty and evidentiary issues. Criminal Law Review 437–454.Google Scholar
  36. Reiman, J. (1995). Driving to the panopticon: A philosophical exploration of the risks to privacy posed by the highway technology of the future. Computer and High Technology Law Journal 11, 27–44.Google Scholar
  37. Rose, N. (2000). Government and control. British Journal of Criminology 40, 321–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Saul, B. (2001). Genetic policing: Forensic DNA testing in new South Wales. Current Issues in Criminal Justice 13(1), 93.Google Scholar
  39. Sykes, C. (2000). The End of Privacy. New York: St Martin's Press.Google Scholar
  40. Thomas, T. (2001). The national collection of criminal records: A question of data quality. Criminal Law Review, 886.Google Scholar
  41. Tracy, P. and Morgan, V. (2000). Big brother and his science kit: DNA databases for21st century crime control? Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 90(2), 635–690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. van der Ploeg, I. (1999). The illegal body: Eurodac and the politics of biometric identification. Ethics and Information Technology 1, 295–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wadham, J. (2002). Databasing of innocent people-why it offers problems not solutions. Liberty Press Release 13 September 2002, available at www.liberty-humanrights. org.uk/.Google Scholar
  44. Walker, C. (1999). Miscarriage of justice in principle and practice. In C. Walker and K. Starmer, Miscarriages of Justice. London: Blackstone.Google Scholar
  45. Walker, C. and Cram, I. (1990). DNA profiling and police powers. Criminal Law Review, 478–493.Google Scholar
  46. Walker, C. and Starmer, K. (1999). Miscarriages of Justice. London: Blackstone.Google Scholar
  47. Walker, C. and Stockdale, R. (1999). Forensic Evidence. In C. Walker and K. Starmer, Miscarriages of Justice. London: Blackstone.Google Scholar
  48. Whitaker, R. (1999). The End of Privacy. New York: The New Press.Google Scholar
  49. Yuthas, K. and Dillard, J. (1999). Ethical development of advanced technology: A postmodern stakeholder approach. Journal of Business Ethics 19, 35–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Law International 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Carole Mccartney

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations