Community Mental Health Journal

, Volume 40, Issue 4, pp 281–295

Measuring Community Preferences for Public Mental Health Services: Pilot Test of a Mail Survey Method

  • Martha Shumway
  • George J. Unick
  • William A. McConnell
  • Ralph Catalano
  • Peter Forster
Article

Abstract

This study tested the feasibility of a simple mail survey approach to measuring community preferences for mental health services. A 38 item survey detected statistically significant differences in preferences for four central goals, finding that community members most value Focus on the Severely Mentally III, followed by Community Safety and Environment, Service Quality and Original Community Mental Health Goals. Some procedural problems were encountered that reduced the response rates, however, the study yielded information that suggests improved procedures for future surveys. Simple mail surveys appear to offer a potentially affordable, efficient way to assess community service priorities.

Community Mental Health services mail survey preferences 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. American Association for Public Opinion Research (2000). Standard definitions: Final dispositions of case codes and outcome rates for surveys. Ann Arbor, MI: AAPOR.Google Scholar
  2. Aubry, T. D., Tefft, B., & Currie, R. F. (1995). Public attitudes and intentions regarding tenants of community mental health residences who are neighbours. Community Mental Health Journal, 31(1), 39–52.Google Scholar
  3. Coddington, D. G. (2001). Impact of political, societal, and local influences on mental health center service providers. Administration and Policy Mental Health, 29(1), 81–7.Google Scholar
  4. Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297–334.Google Scholar
  5. Dillman, D. A. (1978). Mail and telephone surveys: The total design method. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  6. Dillman, D. A. (2000). Mail and internet surveys: The tailored design method. New York: J. Wiley.Google Scholar
  7. Goldman, H. H. (1999). The obligation of mental health services to the least well off. Psychiatric Services, 50, 659–663.Google Scholar
  8. Grob, G. N. (1991). From hospital to community: Mental health policy in modern America. Psychiatric Quarterly, 62(3), 187–212.Google Scholar
  9. Link, B. G., & Cullen, F. T. (1986). Contact with the mentally ill and perceptions of how dangerous they are. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 27(4), 289–302Google Scholar
  10. Mechanic, D. (1994). Establishing mental health priorities. Milbank Quarterly, 72(3), 501–514.Google Scholar
  11. Mechanic, D. (2000). Mental health and social policy: The emergence of managed care, 4th Edition, Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  12. Ng, S. L., Martin, J. L., & Romans, S. E. (1995). A community's attitudes towards the mentally ill. New Zealand Medical Journal, 108, 505–508.Google Scholar
  13. Pescosolido, B. A., Monahan, J., Link, B. G., Stueve, A., & Kikuzawa, S. (1999) The public's view of the competence, dangerousness, and need for legal coercion of persons with mental health problems. American Journal of Public Health, 89(9), 1339–1345Google Scholar
  14. Phelan, J. C., Link, B. G., Stueve, A., & Pescosolido, B. A. (2000). Public conceptions of mental illness in 1950 and 1996: What is mental illness and is it to be feared? Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 41(2), 188–207.Google Scholar
  15. Pro CD Inc. (1997). Select phone deluxe [computer software]. Danvers, MA: Pro CD Inc.Google Scholar
  16. Rosenheck, R. A. (1999). Principles for priority setting in mental health services and their implications for the least well off. Psychiatric Services, 50, 653–658.Google Scholar
  17. Ross, E. C. (2000). Will managed care ever deliver on its promises? Managed care, public policy, and consumers of mental health services. Administration and Policy in Mental Health, 28(1), 7–22.Google Scholar
  18. Star, S. A. (1955). The public's ideas about mental illness. Chicago: National Opinion Research Center.Google Scholar
  19. Taylor, S. M., & Dear, M. J. (1981). Scaling community attitudes toward the mentally ill. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 7, 225–240.Google Scholar
  20. Wolff, G., Pathare, S., Craig, T., & Leff, J. (1996). Community attitudes to mental illness. British Journal of Psychiatry, 168, 183–190.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press, Inc. 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Martha Shumway
    • 1
  • George J. Unick
    • 2
  • William A. McConnell
    • 3
  • Ralph Catalano
    • 3
  • Peter Forster
    • 4
  1. 1.Assistant Professor, Department of PsychiatryUniversity of California
  2. 2.Graduate Student Researcher, Department of PsychiatryUniversity of California
  3. 3.Associate Director for Quality Management, Department of Public HealthDivision of Mental Health Services
  4. 4.Associate Clinical Professor, Department of PsychiatryUniversity of California

Personalised recommendations