Community Mental Health Journal

, Volume 40, Issue 3, pp 265–274

Factors Influencing Social Distance Toward People with Mental Illness

  • Christoph Lauber
  • Carlos Nordt
  • Luis Falcato
  • Wulf Rössler


Background: When identifying ways to reduce stigmatization because of mental illness it is crucial to understand contributing factors. Social distance—the willingness to engage in relationships of varying intimacy with a person—is an indicator of public attitudes toward persons with mental illness. Methods: Multiple linear regression analysis of the results of a vignette-based opinion survey conducted on a representative population sample in Switzerland (n = 594). Results: The level of social distance increases if situations imply ‘social closeness.’ The vignette describing a person with schizophrenia, attitudes to general aspects of mental health (lay helping, community psychiatry), emotions toward those affected, and the attitude toward consequences of mental illness (medical treatment, medication side effects, negative sanctions, e.g. withdrawal of the driver license) were found to predict social distance. Demographic factors such as age, gender, and the cultural background influence social distance. The explained variance (R2) is 44.8%. Conclusions: Social distance is a multifaceted concept influenced by, e.g., socio-economic and cultural factors, but also by the respondent's general attitude toward (mental) health issues. These results suggest that more knowledge about mental illnesses, especially schizophrenia, may increase social distance. The findings presented here may help to focus anti-stigma campaigns not only on transmission of knowledge, but on integrating different approaches.

mental illness attitude public opinion survey social distance stigmatization 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Angermeyer, M.C., Link, B.G. & Majcher-Angermeyer, A. (1987). Stigma perceived by patients attending modern treatment settings. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 175, 4-11.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Angermeyer, M.C. & Matschinger, H. (1997). Social distance toward the mentally ill: results of representative surveys in the Federal republic of Germany. Psychological Medicine, 27, 131-141.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Angermeyer, M.C., Matschinger, H. & Holzinger, A. (1998). Gender and attitudes toward people with schizophrenia. Results of a representative survey in the Federal Republic of Germany. International Journal of Social Psychiatry, 44, 107-116.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bowman, J.T. (1987). Attitudes toward disabled persons: social distance and work competence. Journal of Rehabilitation, 53, 41-44.Google Scholar
  5. Frey, J.H. & Mertens Oishi, S. How to Conduct Interviews by Telephone and in Person. Thousand Oaks, London, New Delhi: Sage, 1995.Google Scholar
  6. Gellis, Z.D., Hu, N.S., Lee, S., Kim, J. (2003). Mental health attitudes among Caucasian-American and Korean counseling students. Community Mental Health Journal, 39, 213-224.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Jorm, A.F., Korten, A.E., Jacomb, P.A., Christensen, H., Rodgers, B., Pollitt, P. (1997). 'Mental health literacy': a survey of the public's ability to recognise mental disorders and their beliefs about the effectiveness of treatment. Medical Journal of Australia, 166, 182-186.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Kish, L. (1949). A procedure for objective respondent selection within households. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 44, 380-387.Google Scholar
  9. Lauber, C., Nordt, C., Falcato, L. & Rössler, W. (2001). Lay recommendations how to treat mental disorders. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 36, 553-556.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Lauber, C., Nordt, C., Falcato, L. & Rössler, W. (2002a). Public acceptance of compulsory admission of mentally ill people. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 105, 385-389.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Lauber, C., Nordt, C., Falcato, L. & Rössler, W. (2002b). Determinants of attitude to volunteering in psychiatry: results of a public opinion survey in Switzerland. International Journal of Social Psychiatry, 48, 209-210.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Lauber, C., Nordt, C., Sartorius, N., Falcato, L. & Rössler, W. (2000). Public acceptance of restrictions on mentally ill people. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 102 (suppl. 407), 26-32.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Lavrakas, P.J. (1993). Telephone Survey Methods: Sampling, Selection, and Supervision. Newbury Park, Ca, London, New Delhi: Sage.Google Scholar
  14. Link, B.G., Cullen, F.T., Frank, J. & Wozniak, J.F. (1987). The social rejection of former mental patients: understanding why labels matter. American Journal of Sociology 92, 1461-1500.Google Scholar
  15. Link, B.G., Phelan, J.C., Bresnahan, M., Stueve, A. & Pescosolido, B.A. (1999). Public conceptions of mental illness: labels, causes, dangerousness, and social distance. American Journal of Public Health, 89, 1328-1333.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Link, B.G., Struening, E.L., Neese-Todd, S., Asmussen, S. & Phelan, J.C. (2001) Stigma as a barrier to recovery: The consequences of stigma for the self-esteem of people with mental illnesses. Psychiatric Services, 52, 1621-1626.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Penn, D.L. & Corrigan, P.W. (2002). The effects of stereotype suppression on psychiatric stigma. Schizophrenia Research, 55, 269-276.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Penn, D.L., Kohlmaier, J.R. & Corrigan, P.W. (2000). Interpersonal factors contributing to the stigma of schizophrenia: social skills, perceived attractiveness, and symptoms. Schizophrenia Research, 45, 37-45.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press, Inc. 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christoph Lauber
    • 1
  • Carlos Nordt
    • 2
  • Luis Falcato
    • 2
  • Wulf Rössler
    • 2
  1. 1.Psychiatric University HospitalZurichSwitzerland
  2. 2.Psychiatric University HospitalZurichSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations