Conservation Genetics

, Volume 5, Issue 4, pp 529–538

Genetic Differentiation of White-Spotted Charr (Salvelinus leucomaenis) Populations After Habitat Fragmentation: Spatial–Temporal Changes in Gene Frequencies

  • S. Yamamoto
  • K. Morita
  • I. Koizumi
  • K. Maekawa


Freshwater fishes that have been isolated by artificial dams have become models for studying the effects of recent barriers on genetic variation and population differentiation. In this study, we examined the genetic structure of 11 populations of white-spotted charr (Salvelinus leucomaenis) by using polymorphic microsatellite loci. Reduced genetic diversity, expressed as the number of alleles and the expected heterozygosity, was observed in all above-dam relative to below-dam populations. Highly significant genetic differentiation (FST) was found for all pairwise comparisons among populations, with FST-values ranging from 0.023 to 0.639. Both multiple regression analysis and a randomization test revealed that genetic differentiation above and below dams was negatively related to the habitat size of above-dam populations, and was positively related to the time period of isolation. This study is one of the few attempts to predict the population genetic structure of such variable spatial–temporal scales. We conclude that differences in genetic structure above and below dams are related to recent historical population size, whereby sites with a lower effective number of adults are more prone to temporal stochasticity in gene frequencies.

genetic differentiation genetic drift habitat fragmentation salmonid spatial–temporal scale 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Angers B, Bernatchez L, Angers A, Desgroseillers L (1995) Specific microsatellite loci for brook charr reveal strong population subdivision on a microgeographic scale. J. Fish Biol., 47, 177–185.Google Scholar
  2. Angers B, Magnan P, Angers A, Desgroseillers L (1999) Canonical correspondence analysis for estimating spatial and environmental effect on microsatellite gene diversity in brook charr (Salvelinus fontinalis). Mol. Ecol., 8, 1043–1054.Google Scholar
  3. Bachman RA (1984) Foraging behavior of free-living wild and hatchery brown trout in a stream. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc., 113, 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bossart JL, Prowell DP (1998) Genetic estimates of population structure and gene flow: limitations, lessons and new directions. Trends Ecol. Evol., 13, 202–206.Google Scholar
  5. Bouza C, Arias J, Castro J, Sanchez L, Martinez P (1999) Genetic structure of brown trout, Salmo trutta L., at the southern limit of the distribution range of the anadromous form. Mol. Ecol., 8, 1991–2001.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Britten HB (1996) Meta-analysis of the association between multilocus heterozygosity and fitness. Evolution, 50, 2158–2164.Google Scholar
  7. Buri P (1956) Gene frequency in small populations of mutant Drosophila. Evolution, 10, 367–402.Google Scholar
  8. Carlsson J, Nilsson J (2000) Population genetic structure of brown trout (Salmo trutta L.) within a northern boreal forest stream. Hereditas, 132, 173–181.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Castric V, Bonney F, Bernatchez L (2001) Landscape structure and hierarchical genetic diversity in the brook charr, Salvelinus fontinalis. Evolution, 55, 1016–1028.Google Scholar
  10. David P (1998) Heterozygosity-tness correlations: new perspectives on old problems. Heredity, 80, 531–537.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Elliott JM (1994) Quantitative Ecology and the Brown Trout. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  12. Estoup A, Rousset F, Michalakis Y, Cornuet JM, Adriamanga M, Guyomard R (1998) Comparative analysis of microsatellite and allozyme markers: a case study investigating microgeographic di. erentiation in brown trout (Salmo trutta). Mol. Ecol., 7, 339–353.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Falconer DS (1989) Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. Longman Scientific and Technical, London.Google Scholar
  14. Frankham R (1996) Relationship of genetic variation to population size in wildlife. Conserv. Biol., 10, 1500–1508.Google Scholar
  15. Garant D, Dodson JJ, Bernatchez L (2000) Ecological determinants and temporal stability of the within-river population structure in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.). Mol. Ecol., 9, 615–628.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Giles BE, Goudet J (1997) Genetic diffrentiation in Silene dioica metapopulations: estimation of spatiotemporal effects in a successional plant species. Am. Nat., 149, 507–526.Google Scholar
  17. Gore JA (1996) Discharge measurements and streamflow analysis. In: Methods in Stream Ecology (eds. Hauer FR, Lamberti GA), pp. 53–74. Academic Press, California.Google Scholar
  18. Goudet J (1999) PCAGEN ver. 1. 2. Population Genetics Laboratory, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.Google Scholar
  19. Hansen MM, Loeschcke V (1996) Temporal variation in mitochondrial DNA haplotype frequencies in a brown trout (Salmo trutta L.) population that shows stability in nuclear allele frequencies. Evolution, 50, 454–457.Google Scholar
  20. Hansen MM, Mensberg KLD (1998) Genetic differentiation and relationship between genetic and geographical distance in Danish sea trout (Salmo salar L.) populations. Heredity, 81, 493–504.Google Scholar
  21. Hébert C, Danzman RG, Jones MW, Bernatchez L (2000) Hydrography and population genetic structure in brook charr (Salvelinus fontinalis, Mitchill) from eastern Canada. Mol. Ecol., 9, 971–982.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Hedrick PW, Gilpin ME (1997) Genetic effective size of a metapopulation. In: Metapopulation Biology: Ecology, Genetics, and Evolution (eds. Hanski IA, Gilpin ME), pp. 165–181. Academic Press, California.Google Scholar
  23. Hernandez-Martich JD, Smith MH (1997) Downstream gene flow and genetic structure of Gambusia holbrooki (eastern mosquito sh) populations. Heredity, 79, 295–301.Google Scholar
  24. Kimura M, Crow JF (1963) On the maximum avoidance of inbreeding. Gen. Res., 4, 399–415.Google Scholar
  25. Meffe GK, Vrijenhoek RC (1988) Conservation genetics in the management of desert fishes. Conserv. Biol., 2, 157–169.Google Scholar
  26. Morita K, Takashima Y (1998) Effect of female size on fecundity and egg size in white-spotted charr: comparison between sea-run and resident forms. J. Fish Biol., 53, 1140–1142.Google Scholar
  27. Morita K, Yamamoto S (2002) Effects of habitat fragmentation by damming on the persistence of stream-dwelling charr populations. Conserv. Biol., 16, 1318–1323.Google Scholar
  28. Morita K, Yamamoto S, Hoshino N (2000) Extreme life history change of white-spotted char (Salvelinus leucomaenis) after damming. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 57, 1300–1306.Google Scholar
  29. Nakano S (1995) Individual differences in resource use, growth and emigration under the influence of a dominance hierarchy in fluvial red-spotted masu salmon in a natural habitat. J. Anim. Ecol., 64, 75–84.Google Scholar
  30. Nakano S, Kitano F, Maekawa K (1996) Potential fragmentation and loss of the thermal habitats for charrs in the Japanese archipelago due to climatic warming. Freshw. Biol., 36, 711–722.Google Scholar
  31. Nei M, Maruyama T, Chakraborty R (1975) The bottleneck effect and genetic variability in populations. Evolution, 29, 1–10.Google Scholar
  32. Neraas LP, Spruell P (2001) Fragmentation of riverine systems: the genetic effects of dams on bull trout (Salvelinus confluentus) in the Clark Fork River system. Mol. Ecol., 10, 1153–1164.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Nielsen EE, Hansen MM, Loeschcke V (1999) Genetic variation in time and space: microsatellite analysis of extinct and extant populations of Atlantic salmon. Evolution, 53, 261–268Google Scholar
  34. O'Reilly PT, Hamilton LC, McConnell SK, Wright JM (1996) Rapid analysis of genetic variation in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) by PCR multiplexing of dinucleotide and tetranucleotide microsatellites. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 53, 2292–2298.Google Scholar
  35. Quattro JM, Vrijenhoek RC (1989) Fitness differences among remnant populations of endangered Sonoran topminnow. Science, 245, 976–978.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Raymond M, Rousset F (1995) GENEPOP (version 3. 1): population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenism. J. Heredity, 86, 248–249.Google Scholar
  37. Rice WR (1989) Analysing tables of statistical tests. Evolution, 43, 223–225.Google Scholar
  38. Schneider S, Roessli D, Excoffier L (2000) ARLEQUIN ver. 2.000: A Software for Population Genetic Data Analysis. Genetics and Biometry Laboratory, Department of Anthropology and Ecology, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.Google Scholar
  39. Shikano T, Chiyokubo T, Taniguchi N (2001) Temporal changes in allele frequency, genetic variation and inbreeding depression in small populations of the guppy, Poecilia reticulata. Heredity, 86, 153–160.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Shimoda K, Nakano S, Yamamoto S (2002) Landlocking of anadromous white-spotted charr Salvelinus leucomaenis by damming. Jpn. J. Ichthyol., 49, 25–32.Google Scholar
  41. Templeton AR, Robertson RJ, Brisson J, Strasburg J (2001) Disrupting evolutionary process: the effect of habitat fragmentation on collared lizards in the Missouri Ozarks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 98, 5426–5432.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Tessier N, Bernatchez L (1999) Stability of population structure and genetic diversity across generations assessed by micro-satellites among sympatric populations of landlocked Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.). Mol. Ecol., 8, 169–179.Google Scholar
  43. Vrijenhoek RC (1994) Genetic diversity and tness in small populations. In: Conservation Genetics (eds. Loeschcke V, Tomiuk J, Jain SK), pp. 37–53. Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel.Google Scholar
  44. Weir BS, Cockerham CC (1984) Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution, 38, 1358–1370.Google Scholar
  45. Yamamoto S, Nakano S (1996) Growth and development of a bimodal length–frequency distribution during smolting in a wild population of white-spotted charr in northern Japan. J. Fish Biol., 48, 68–79.Google Scholar
  46. Yamamoto S, Morita K, Goto A (1999) Geographic variations in life-history characteristics of white-spotted charr (Salvelinus leucomaenis). Can. J. Zool., 77, 871–878.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. Yamamoto
    • 1
  • K. Morita
    • 2
  • I. Koizumi
    • 3
  • K. Maekawa
    • 3
  1. 1.National Research Institute of Fisheries ScienceFisheries Research AgencyTochigiJapan
  2. 2.Hokkaido National Fisheries Research InstituteFisheries Research AgencyHokkaidoJapan
  3. 3.Field Science Center for Northern BiosphereHokkaido UniversitySapporoJapan

Personalised recommendations