Conservation Genetics

, Volume 5, Issue 3, pp 349–355 | Cite as

Hybridization Between Canada Lynx and Bobcats: Genetic Results and Management Implications

  • Michael K. Schwartz
  • Kristine L. Pilgrim
  • Kevin S. McKelvey
  • Edward L. Lindquist
  • James J. Claar
  • Steve Loch
  • Leonard F. Ruggiero
Article

Abstract

Hybridization between taxonomically similar species is an often-overlooked mechanism limiting the recovery of threatened and endangered species. We present molecular genetic data for the first time demonstrating that Canada lynx and bobcats hybridize in the wild. We verify that two microsatellite loci Lc106 and Lc110 have non-overlapping allele ranges between Canada lynx and bobcats, and that three putative lynx from Minnesota contain DNA from both bobcats and lynx. Additionally, we use a published test for the 16S rRNA region of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) to determine the maternal species; all hybrids had lynx mothers. Fifteen per cent (3/20) of our ‘putative lynx’ samples were hybrids, although these data are not from a representative sampling effort. Hybridization may be an under-appreciated factor limiting the distribution and recovery of lynx. The presence of hybrids is thus a new factor in the population management of both species with potential implications for hunting and trapping of bobcats.

Bobcat DNA hybridizatioin Lynx management microsatellite non-invasive genetic sampling 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allendorf FW, Leary RF, Spruell P, Wenburg JK (2001) The problems with hybrids: Setting conservation guidelines. Trends Ecol. Evol., 16, 613–622.Google Scholar
  2. Aubry KB, Koehler GM, Squires JR (2000) Ecology of Canada lynx in Southern Boreal Forests. In: Ecology and Conservation of Lynx in the United States (eds. Ruggiero LF et al.), pp. 373–396. University Press of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado, USA.Google Scholar
  3. Avise JC, Bermingham E, Kessler LG, Saunders NC (1984) Characterization of mitochondrial DNA variability in a hybrid swarm between subspecies of bluegill sunfish (Lepomis macrochirus). Evolution, 385, 931–941.Google Scholar
  4. Barton N (2001) The role of hybridization in evolution. Mol. Ecol., 10, 551–568.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Buskirk SW, Ruggiero LF, Krebs CJ (2000) Habitat fragmentation and interspecific competition: Implications for lynx conservation. In: Ecology and Conservation of Lynx in the United States (eds. Ruggiero LF et al.), pp. 83–100. University Press of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado, USA.Google Scholar
  6. Carmichael LE, Clark W, Strobeck C (2000) Development and characterization of microsatellite loci from lynx (Lynx canadensis) and their use in other fields. Mol. Ecol., 9, 2197–2198.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Creel S, Spong G, Sands JL, Rotella J, Zeigle J, Joe L, Murphy KM, Smith D (2003) Population size estimation in Yellow-stone wolves with error-prone noninvasive microsatellite genotypes. Mol. Ecol., 12, 2003–2009.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Dowling TE, Secor CL (1996) The role of hybridization and introgression in the diversification of animals. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 28, 593–619.Google Scholar
  9. Ernest HB, Penedo MCT, May BP, Syvanen M, Boyce WM (2000) Molecular tracking of mountain lions in the Yosemite Valley region in California: Genetic analysis using microsatellites and faecal DNA. Mol. Ecol., 9, 433–441.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Evett IW, Weir BS (1998) Interpreting DNA Evidence: Statistical Genetics for Forensic Scientists. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA, USA.Google Scholar
  11. Federal Register (2000) Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Determination of Threatened Status for the Contiguous US Distinct Population Segments of the Canada Lynx and Related Rule; Final Rule. Vol. 65, pp. 16051–16086.Google Scholar
  12. Federal Register (2003) Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Reopening of Comment Period for Final Rule to list the contiguous United States Distinct Population Segment of the Canada lynx. Vol. 68, pp. 12611–12612.Google Scholar
  13. Forbes SH, Allendorf FW (1991) Associations between mitochondrial and nuclear genotypes in cutthroat trout hybrid swarms. Evolution, 45, 1332–1349.Google Scholar
  14. Gagneux P, Boesch C, Woodruff DS (1997) Microsatellite scoring errors associated with noninvasive genotyping based on nuclear DNA amplified from shed hair. Mol. Ecol., 6, 861–868.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Goodman SJ, Barton NH, Swanson G, Abernethy K, Pemberton JM (1999) Introgression through rare hybridization: A genetic study of a hybrid zone between red and sika deer (Genus Cervus) in Argyll, Scotland. Genetics, 152, 355–371.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Goossens B, Waits LP, Taberlet P (1998) Plucked hair samples as a source of DNA: Reliability of dinucleotide microsatellite genotyping. Mol. Ecol., 7, 1237–1241.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Johnson W, O’Brien SJ (1997) Phylogenetic reconstruction of the Felidae using 16S rRNA and NADH-5 mitochondrial genes. J. Mol. Evol., 44, S98–S116.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Leary RF, Allendorf FW, Forbes SH (1993) Conservation genetics of bull trout in the Columbia and Klamath River Drainages. Conserv. Biol., 7, 856–865.Google Scholar
  19. Mayr E (1972) Sexual selection and natural selection. In: Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man (ed. Campbell B.), pp. 87–104. Heinemann, London, England.Google Scholar
  20. McKelvey KS, Aubry KB, Ortega YK (2000) History and distribution of lynx in the contiguous United States. In: Ecology and Conservation of Lynx in the United States (eds. Ruggiero LF et al.), pp. 207–264. University Press of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado, USA.Google Scholar
  21. Mills LS, Citta JJ, Lair KP, Schwartz MK, Tallmon DA (2000) Estimating animal abundance using noninvasive DNA sampling: Promise and pitfalls. Ecol. Appl., 10, 283–294.Google Scholar
  22. Mills LS, Pilgrim K, Schwartz MK, McKelvey K (2001) Identifying lynx and other North American felids based on MtDNA analysis. Conserv. Genet., 1, 285–289.Google Scholar
  23. Mowat G, Paetkau D (2002) Estimating marten Martes americana population size using hair capture and genetic tagging. Wildlife Biol., 8, 201–209.Google Scholar
  24. Mowat G, Poole KG, O’Donoghue M (2000) Ecology of lynx in Northern Canada and Alaska. In: Ecology and Conservation of Lynx in the United States (eds. Ruggiero LF et al.), pp. 265–306. University Press of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado, USA.Google Scholar
  25. Nei M (1987) Molecular Evolutionary Genetics. Columbia University Press, New York, USA.Google Scholar
  26. Paetkau D (2003) An empirical exploration of data quality in DNA-based population inventories. Mol. Ecol., 12, 1375–1387.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Rhymer JM, Simberloff D (1996) Extinction by hybridization and introgression. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 27, 83–109.Google Scholar
  28. Schwartz MK, Mills LS, McKelvey KS, Ruggiero LF, Allendorf FW (2002) DNA reveals high dispersal synchronizing the population dynamics of Canada lynx. Nature, 415, 520–522.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Schwartz MK, Mills LS, Ortega Y, Ruggiero LF, Allendorf FW (2003) Landscape location affects genetic variation of Canada lynx. Mol. Ecol., 12, 1807–1816.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Slough BG, Mowat G (1996) Population dynamics of lynx in a refuge and interactions between harvested and unharvested populations. J. Wildlife Manage., 60, 946–961.Google Scholar
  31. Spruell P, Bartron M, Kanda N, Allendorf FW (2001) Detection of hybrids between bull trout (Salvelinus confluentus) and brook trout (Salvelinus fontinalis) using PCR primers complementary to interspersed nuclear elements. Copia, 4, 1093–1099.Google Scholar
  32. Taberlet P, Griffin S, Goossens B, Questiau S, Manceau V, Escaravage N, Waits LP, Bouvet J (1996) Reliable genotyping of samples with very low DNA quantities using PCR. Nucl. Acids Res., 26, 3189–3194.Google Scholar
  33. Taberlet P, Waits LP, Luikart G (1999) Noninvasive genetic sampling: Look before you leap. Trends Ecol. Evol., 14, 323–327.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Tranah GJ, Bagley M, Agresti JJ, May B (2003) Development of codominant markers for identifying species hybrids. Conserv. Genet., 4, 537–541.Google Scholar
  35. Waits JL, Leberg PL (2000) Biases associated with population estimation using molecular tagging. Animal Conserv., 3, 191–199.Google Scholar
  36. Waits LP, Luikart G, Taberlet P (2001) Estimating the probability of identity among genotypes in natural populations: Cautions and guidelines. Mol. Ecol., 10, 249–256.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Ward RMP, Krebs CJ (1985) Behavioral responses of lynx to declining snowshoe hare abundance. Can. J. Zool., 63, 2817–2824.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Werdelin L (1981) Evolution of lynxes. Ann. Zool. Fenn., 18, 37–71.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael K. Schwartz
    • 1
  • Kristine L. Pilgrim
    • 1
  • Kevin S. McKelvey
    • 1
  • Edward L. Lindquist
    • 2
  • James J. Claar
    • 3
  • Steve Loch
    • 2
  • Leonard F. Ruggiero
    • 3
  1. 1.USDA/USFS Rocky Mountain Research StationMissoulaUSA; fax:
  2. 2.USDA/USFS Superior National ForestDuluthUSA
  3. 3.USDA/USFS Northern Regional OfficeMissoulaUSA

Personalised recommendations