Organizational Design of Post Corporation Structure Using Fuzzy Multicriteria Decision Making

  • Momčilo Kujačić
  • Nebojša J. Bojović
Article

Abstract

A model for organizational design of post corporation structure is developed in this paper. Alternative organization solutions have been designed taking into account the post environment characterized by private operators' competition and development of new message transmission technologies. Criteria for organizational design have been considered as numerical and uncertain linguistic variables describes by fuzzy sets. The model has been tested on a numerical example.

organizational design post corporation multicriteria analysis uncertainty fuzzy sets 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arrow, K.J. and R. Radner (1979), “Allocation of Resources in Large Teams,” Econometrica, 47, 361–385.Google Scholar
  2. Barua, A. and A.B. Whinston (1998), “Decision Support for Managing Organizational Design Dynamics,” Decision Support Systems, 22, 45–48.Google Scholar
  3. Baumol, W.J. and L. Fabian (1964), “Decomposition, Pricing for Decentralization and External Economics,” Management Science, 11, 1–32.Google Scholar
  4. Burton, R.M. and B. Obel (1977), “The Multilevel Approach to Organizational Issues of the Firm—A Critical Review,” OMEGA, 5, 395–414.Google Scholar
  5. Burton, R.M. and B. Obel (1995), “Mathematical Contingency Modelling for Organizational Design: Taking Stock,” in Borge Obel and Richard Burton (Eds), Design Models for Hierarchical Organizations. Computation, Information and Decentralization. Kluwer Academic Press Publishers, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  6. Burton, R.M. and B. Obel (1996). Strategic Organizational Diagnosis and Design, Cluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  7. Carley, K.M. and Z. Lin (1995), “Organizational Designs Suited to High Performance Under Stress,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, SMC-25(2), 221–230.Google Scholar
  8. Carley K.M. (1995), “Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory: Perspective and Directions,” Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, 1, 39–56.Google Scholar
  9. Carley, K.M. (1996), “A Comparison of Artificial and Human Organizations,” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 31, 175–191.Google Scholar
  10. Carroll, T. and R.M. Burton (2000), “Organizations and Complexity: Searching for the Edge of Chaos,” Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, 6, 319–337.Google Scholar
  11. Dantzig, G. and P. Wolfe (1961), “The Decomposition Principle for Linear Programming,” Econometrica, 29, 767–778.Google Scholar
  12. Dubois, D. and H. Prade (1978), “Operations on Fuzzy Numbers,” International Journal of Systems Science, 9, 613–626.Google Scholar
  13. Dubois, D. and H. Prade (1987), “Fuzzy Numbers: An Overview,” Analysis of Fuzzy Information, 1, 3–39 CRC Press, Boca Raton.Google Scholar
  14. Eckenrode, R.T. (1961), “Weighting Multiple Criteria,” Management Science, 12, 180–192.Google Scholar
  15. Galbraith, J.R. (1977). Organization Design, Addison—Wesley Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  16. Hyatt, A., N. Contractor and P. Jones (1997), “Computational Organizational Network Modeling: Strategies and an Example,” Computational and Mathematical Organizations Theory, 3(4), 285–300.Google Scholar
  17. Hwang, C.L. and K. Yoon (1981). Multiple Attribute Decision Making—Methods and Applications, Springer, New York.Google Scholar
  18. Jehiel, P. (1999), “Information Aggregation and Communication in Organizations,” Management Science, 45(5), 659–699.Google Scholar
  19. Jin, Y. and R. E. Levitt (1996), “The Virtual Design Team: A Computational Model of Project Organizations,” Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, 2(3), 171–196.Google Scholar
  20. Joslyn, C. (1994), Possibilistic Processes for Complex Systems Modeling, PhD Dissertation, SUNY—Binghamton, Systems Science.Google Scholar
  21. Joslyn, C. and L. Rocha (2000), “Towards Semiotic Agent—Based Models of Socio—Technical Organizations,” Proceedings AI, Simulation and Planing in High Autonomy Systems, ed HS Sarjoughian et al.Google Scholar
  22. Kapasouris, P., D. Serfaty, J.C. Deckert, J.G. Wohl and K.R. Pattipati (1991), “Resource Allocation and Performance Evalution in Large Human—Machine Organizations,” IEEE Transactions on System, Man and Cybernetics, SMC-21(3), 521–532.Google Scholar
  23. Kauffman, S. (1993). Origins of Order, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Klir, G. and T. Folger (1987). Fuzzy Sets, Uncertainty and Information, Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  25. Kosko, B. (1990), “Fuzziness vs. Probability,” International Journal of General Systems, 17 (2/3), 211–240.Google Scholar
  26. Kosko, B. (1990). Neural Networks and Fuzzy Systems, Prentice—Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.Google Scholar
  27. Lawrence, P.R. and J.W. Lorsch (1967). Organization and Environment: Managing Differentiation and Integration. Boston: Graduate School of Business Administration, Harvard University.Google Scholar
  28. Levitt, R.E., J. Thomsen, T.R. Christiansen, J.C. Kunz, Y. Jin and C. Nass (1999), “Simulating Project Work Process and Organizations: Toward a Micro—Contingency Theory of Organizational Design,” Management Science, 45(11), 1479–1495.Google Scholar
  29. March, J. and H. Simon, (1958). Organizations. New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
  30. Newell, A. and H. A. Simon (1972). Human Problem Solving, Englewood Cliffs, NY: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  31. Papastavrou, J.D. and M. Athans (1992), “On Optimal Distributed Decision Architectures in a Hypothesis Testing Environment,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, AC-37(8), 1154–1169.Google Scholar
  32. Perdu, D.M. and A.H. Levis (1998), “Adaption as a Morphing Process: A Methodology for the Design and Evaluation of Adaptive Organizational Structures,” Computational and Mathematical Organizational Theory, 4(1), 5–41.Google Scholar
  33. Pete, A., K.R. Pattipati and D.L. Kleinman (1993), “Distributed Detection in Teams with Partial Information: A Normative—Descriptive Modal,” IEEE Transactions on System, Man and Cybernetics, SMC-23(6), 1626–1648.Google Scholar
  34. Pete, A., K.R. Pattipati and D.L. Kleinman (1994), “Optimization of Detection Networks with Multiple Event Structures,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, AC-39(8), 1702–1707.Google Scholar
  35. Pete, A., K.R. Pattipati and D.L. Kleinman (1995), “Structural Reconfiguration and Informal Coordination in Administrative Organizations,” Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, 1(1), 93–116.Google Scholar
  36. Pete, A., K.R. Pattipati and D.L. Kleinman (1996), “Optimization of Decision Networks in Structured Task Environments,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics—Part A: Systems and Humans, SMC-26(6), 739–748.Google Scholar
  37. Pete, A., K.R. Pattipati and D.L. Kleinman (1998), “An Overview of Decision Networks and Organizations,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics—Part C: Applications and Reviews, SMC-28(2), 173–193.Google Scholar
  38. Petrović, S. and R. Petrović (1998), “Fuzzy Multicriteria Methodology (FMM),”—Decision Support Software.Google Scholar
  39. Petrović, S. and R. Petrović (1999) “A New Fuzzy Multicriteria Methodology for Ranking Alternatives,” Proceedings of XV World Conference on Operational Research, IFORS 99, Beijing, P.R. China, August 16–20, pp. 117.Google Scholar
  40. So, Y. and E.H. Durfee (1996), “Designing Tree—Stuctured Organizations for Computational Agents,” Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, 2(3), 219–246.Google Scholar
  41. Tang, Z.B., K.R. Pattipati and D.L. Kleinman (1993), “Optimization of Detection Networks: Part II—Tree Structures,” IEEE Transactions on System, Man and Cybernetics, SMC-23 (1), 211–221.Google Scholar
  42. Zadeh, L.A. (1965), “Fuzzy sets,” Information and Control, 8, 338–353.Google Scholar
  43. Zaidi, A.K. and A.H. Levis (1997), “Validation and Verification of Decision Making Rules,” Automatica, 33(2), 155–169.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Momčilo Kujačić
    • 1
  • Nebojša J. Bojović
    • 2
  1. 1.“Srbija” PTT CorporationBelgradeYugoslavia
  2. 2.Faculty of Traffic and Transportation EngineeringUniversity of BelgradeBelgradeYugoslavia

Personalised recommendations