Climatic Change

, Volume 65, Issue 3, pp 297–314

Sink Potential of Canadian Agricultural Soils

  • M. Boehm
  • B. Junkins
  • R. Desjardins
  • S. Kulshreshtha
  • W. Lindwall
Article

Abstract

Net greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from Canadian crop and livestock production were estimated for 1990, 1996 and 2001 and projected to 2008. Net emissions were also estimated for three scenarios (low (L), medium (M) and high (H)) of adoption of sink enhancing practices above the projected 2008 level. Carbon sequestration estimates were based on four sink-enhancing activities: conversion from conventional to zero tillage (ZT), reduced frequency of summerfallow (SF), the conversion of cropland to permanent cover crops (PC), and improved grazing land management (GM). GHG emissions were estimated with the Canadian Economic and Emissions Model for Agriculture (CEEMA). CEEMA estimates levels of production activities within the Canadian agriculture sector and calculates the emissions and removals associated with those levels of activities. The estimates indicate a decline in net emissions from 54 Tg CO2–Eq yr−1 in1990 to 52 Tg CO2–Eq yr−1 in 2008. Adoption of thesink-enhancing practices above the level projected for 2008 resulted in further declines in emissions to 48 Tg CO2–Eq yr−1 (L), 42 TgCO2–Eq yr−1 (M) or 36 Tg CO2–Eq yr−1 (H). Among thesink-enhancing practices, the conversion from conventional tillage to ZT provided the largest C sequestration potential and net reduction in GHG emissions among the scenarios. Although rates of C sequestration were generally higher for conversion of cropland to PC and adoption of improved GM, those scenarios involved smaller areas of land and therefore less C sequestration. Also, increased areas of PC were associated with an increase in livestock numbers and CH4 and N2O emissions from enteric fermentation andmanure, which partially offset the carbon sink. The CEEMA estimates indicate that soil C sinks are a viable option for achieving the UNFCCC objective of protecting and enhancing GHG sinks and reservoirs as a means of reducing GHG emissions (UNFCCC, 1992).

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson, D. W.: 1995, ‘Decomposition of Organic Matter and Carbon Emissions from Soils’, in Lal, R., Kimble, J., Levine, E., and Stewart B. A. (eds.), Advances in Soil Science: Soils and Global Change, Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FL.Google Scholar
  2. Beare, M. H., Hendrix, P. F., and Coleman, D. C.: 1994, ‘Water-Stable Aggregates and Organic Matter Fractions in Conventional and No-Tillage Soils’, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 58, 777–786.Google Scholar
  3. Boehm, M. M. and Anderson, D. W.: 1997, ‘A Landscape-Scale Study of Soil Quality in Three Prairie Farming Systems’, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 61, 1147–1159.Google Scholar
  4. Bremer, E., Janzen, H. H., and Johnston, A. M.: 1994, ‘Sensitivity of Total, Light Fraction and Mineralizable Organic Matter to Management Practices in a Lethbridge Soil’, Can. J. Soil Sci. 74, 131–138.Google Scholar
  5. Bruce, J. P., Frome,M., Haites, E., Janzen, H., Lal, R., and Paustian, K.: 1999, ‘Carbon Sequestration in Soils’, J. Soil Water Conservation 52, 382–389.Google Scholar
  6. Bruce, R. R., Langdale G. W., and Dillard. A. L.: 1990, ‘Tillage and Crop Rotation Effect on Characteristics of a Sandy Surface Soil’, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 54, 1744–1747.Google Scholar
  7. Campbell, C. A., Lafond, G. P., Leyshon, A. J., Zentner R. P., and Janzen, H. H.: 1991, ‘Effect of Cropping Practices on the Initial Potential Rate of N Mineralization in a Thin Black Chernozem’, Can. J. Soil Sci. 71, 43–53.Google Scholar
  8. Campbell, C. A., McConkey, B. G., Zentner, R. P., Dyck, F. B., Selles, F., and Curtin, D.: 1995, ‘Carbon Sequestration in a Brown Chernozem as Affected by Tillage and Rotation’, Can. J. Soil Sci. 75, 449–458.Google Scholar
  9. Campbell, C. A., McConkey, B. G., Zentner, R. P., Selles, F., and Curtin, D.: 1996a, ‘Long-Term Effects of Tillage and Crop Rotations on Soil Organic C and Total N in a Clay Soil in Southwestern Saskatchewan’, Can. J. Soil Sci. 76, 395–401.Google Scholar
  10. Campbell, C. A., McConkey, B. G., Zentner, R. P., Selles, F., and Curtin. D.: 1996b, ‘Tillage and Crop Rotation Effects on Soil Organic C and N in a Coarse-Textured Typic Haploboroll in Southwestern Saskatchewan’, Soil & Tillage Research 37, 3–14.Google Scholar
  11. Campbell, C. A. and Zentner, R. P.: 1993, ‘Soil Organic Matter as Influenced by Crop Rotations and Fertilization’, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 57, 1034–1040.Google Scholar
  12. Carefoot, J. M., Nyborg M., and Lindwall, C. W.: 1990, ‘Tillage-Induced Soil Changes and Related Grain Yield in a Semi-Arid Region’, Can. J. Soil. Sci. 70, 203–214.Google Scholar
  13. Carter, M. R.: 1992, ‘Characterizing the Soil Physical Condition in Reduced Tillage Systems for Winter Wheat on a Fine Sandy Loam Using Small Cores’, Can. J. Soil Sci. 72, 395–402.Google Scholar
  14. Corre, M. D., Pennock D. J., van Kessel, C., and Elliott, D. K.: 1999, ‘Estimation of Annual Nitrous Oxide Emissions from a Transitional Grassland-Forest Region in Saskatchewan, Canada’, Biogeochemistry 44, 29–49.Google Scholar
  15. Doran, J. W. and Linn, D. M.: 1994, ‘Microbial Ecology of Conservation Management Systems’, in Hatfield, J. L. and Stewart, B. A. (eds.), Soil Biology: Effects on Soil Quality. Advances in Soil Science, Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FL, pp. 1–27.Google Scholar
  16. Dumanski, J., Desjardins, R. L., Tarnocai, C., Monreal, C., Gregorich, E. G., Campbell, C. A., and Kirkwood, V.: 1998, ‘Possibilities for Future Carbon Sequestration in Canadian Agriculture in Relation to Land-Use Changes’, Global Change 40, 81–103.Google Scholar
  17. Ellert, B. H., Janzen, H. H., and McConkey, B. G.: 2001, ‘Measuring and Comparing Soil Carbon Storage’, in Lal, R., Kimble, J., Follet, R., and Stewart, B. A. (eds.), Assessment Methods for Soil Carbon Pools, Advances in Soil Science, Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FL, pp. 131–146.Google Scholar
  18. FCCC/CP/2001/13/Add.1: 2002, 'The Marrakech Accords and the Marrakech Declaration’, http:// www.unfccc.int.Google Scholar
  19. Gallaher, R. N. and Ferrer, M. B.: 1987, ‘Effect of No-Tillage versus Conventional Tillage on Soil Organic Matter and Nitrogen Contents’, Commun. in Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 18, 1061–1076.Google Scholar
  20. Gregorich, E. G., Carter, M. R., Angers, D. A., Monreal, C. M., and Ellert, B. H.: 1994, ‘Towards a Minimum Data Set to Assess Soil Organic Matter Quality in Agricultural Soils’, Can. J. Soil Sci. 74, 367–386.Google Scholar
  21. Havlin, J. L., Kissel, D. E., Maddux, L. D., Claassen M. M., and Long, J. H.: 1990, ‘Crop Rotation and Tillage Effects on Soil Organic Carbon and Nitrogen’, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 54, 448–452.Google Scholar
  22. Hendrix, P. F., Parmelee, R. W., Crossley, D. A., Coleman, D. C., Odum E. P., and Groffman, P. M.: 1986, ‘Detritus Food Webs in Conventional and No-Tillage Agroecosystems’, BioScience 36, 374–380.Google Scholar
  23. Horner, G. L., Corman, J., Howitt, R. E., Carter, C. A., and MacGregor, R. J.: 1992, 'The Canadian Regional Agricultural Model: Structure, Operations and Development’, Technical Report 1/92, Policy Branch, AAFC, Ottawa.Google Scholar
  24. IPCC: 1997, Revised 1996 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories, Vol. 3, Greenhouse Gas Inventory Reference Manual. IPCC/OECD/IEA.UK.Google Scholar
  25. IPCC: 2000, 'Land Use, Land Use Change, and Forestry’, Special Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, in Watson, R. T., Noble, I. R., Bolin, B., Ravindranath, N. H., Verardo, D. J., and Dokken, D. J. (eds.), Cambridge University Press, U.K., 375 pp.Google Scholar
  26. Janzen, H. H., Campbell, C. A., Izaurralde, R. C., Ellert, B. H., Juma, N.,McGill, W. B., and Zentner. R. P.: 1998, ‘Management Effects on Soil C Storage on the Canadian Prairies’, Soil & Tillage Research 47, 181–195.Google Scholar
  27. Kulshreshtha, S., Gill, R., Junkins, B., Desjardins, R., Boehm, M., and Bonneau, M.: 2002, 'Canadian Economic and Emissions Model for Agriculture (CEEMA 2.0): Technical Documentation’, CSALEWorking Paper #12, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada.Google Scholar
  28. Lal, R., Mahboubi, A. A., and Fausey, N. R.: 1994, ‘Long-Term Tillage and Rotation Effects on Properties of a Central Ohio Soil’, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 58, 517–522.Google Scholar
  29. Lemke, R. L., Lafond, G., Brandt, S., Malhi, S. S., and Farrell. R.: 2003, ‘Nitrogen Fertilizers and N2O Emissions’, Proceedings of the Manitoba-North Dakota Zero Tillage Association Meetings, January 28–29, 2003, Brandon, Manitoba.Google Scholar
  30. Liang, B. C., McConkey, B. G., Campbell, C. A., and Curtin, D., Moulin, A., Brandt, S. A., and Lafond, G. P.: 1999, ‘Crop Rotation and Tillage Impact on Carbon Sequestration in Saskatchewan Soils’, Proceedings of Saskatoon Soils & Crops Workshop, February 25–26, 1999, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan.Google Scholar
  31. Mahboubi, A. A., Lal R., and Faussey, N. R.: 1993, ‘Twenty-Eight Years of Tillage Effects on Two Soil in Ohio’, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 57, 506–512.Google Scholar
  32. Martin, R. and Fredeen, A.: 1999, 'Effect of Management of Grasslands on GHG Balance’, Report prepared for the Agriculture and Agri-Food Table, Environment Bureau, AAFC, Ottawa, Ont.Google Scholar
  33. McConkey, B. G., Liang, B. C., and Campbell, C. A.: 1999, ‘Estimating Gains of Soil Carbon over a 15-Year Period Due to Changes in Fallow Frequency, Tillage System, and Fertilization Practices for the Canadian Prairies (An Expert Opinion)’, Misc. Publication #379M0209, Swift Current Semiarid Prairie Agricultural Research Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, 9 pp.Google Scholar
  34. Neitzert, F., Olsen, K., and Collas, P.: 1999, 'Canada's Greenhouse Gas Inventory, 1997 Emissions and Removals with Trends’, Environmental Canada, April.Google Scholar
  35. Nyborg, M., Solberg, E. D., Malhi S. S., and Izaurralde, R. C.: 1995, ‘Fertilizer N, Crop Residue, and Tillage Alter Soil C and N Content in a Decade’, in Lal, R., Kimble, J. M., Follett, R. F., and Stewart, B. A. (eds.), Soil Processes and the Carbon Cycle, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.Google Scholar
  36. Policy Branch, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada: 2001a, ‘Canadian Fertilizer Consumption, Shipments and Trade’, Annual publications of Policy Branch, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, http://www.agr.ca/policy/cdnfert/text.htmlGoogle Scholar
  37. Policy Branch, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada: 2001b, 'Medium Term Policy Baseline’, Ottawa, Canada, http://www.agr.ca/policy/epad/english/pubs/mtbGoogle Scholar
  38. Smith, W. N., Desjardins, R. L., and Grant, B.: 2001, ‘Estimated Changes in Soil Carbon Associated with Agricultural Practices in Canada’, Can. J. Soil Sci. 81, 1–7.Google Scholar
  39. Statistics Canada: 1993, 'Census of Agriculture, 1991’, Ottawa, Canada.Google Scholar
  40. Statistics Canada: 1997, 'Census of Agriculture, 1996’, Ottawa, Canada.Google Scholar
  41. UNFCCC: 1992, 'United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change’, http://www.unfccc. de/resource/conv/index.htmlGoogle Scholar
  42. Watson, R. T., Rodhe, H., Oeschger, H., Siegenthaler, U.: 1990, ‘Greenhouse Gases and Aerosols’, in Houghton, J. T., Jenkins G. J., and Ephraums, J. J. (eds.), Climate Change: The IPCC Scientific Assessment, Cambridge University Press, U.K., 365 pp.Google Scholar
  43. Wood, C. W. and Edwards, J. H.: 1992, ‘Agroecosystem Management Effects on Soil Carbon and Nitrogen’, Agric., Ecosystems, and Env. 39, 123–138.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Boehm
    • 1
  • B. Junkins
    • 2
  • R. Desjardins
    • 2
  • S. Kulshreshtha
    • 3
  • W. Lindwall
    • 2
  1. 1.Agriculture and Agriculture-Food CanadaSaskatoonCanada
  2. 2.Agriculture and Agriculture-Food CanadaCentral Experimental FarmOttawaCanada
  3. 3.Department of Agricultural EconomicsUniversity of SaskatchewanSaskatoonCanada

Personalised recommendations