Advertisement

Climatic Change

, Volume 65, Issue 1–2, pp 1–9 | Cite as

Characterizing Climate-Change Uncertainties for Decision-Makers. An Editorial Essay

  • Robert Lempert
  • Nebojsa Nakicenovic
  • Daniel Sarewitz
  • Michael Schlesinger
Article

Keywords

Editorial Essay 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arrow, K. J., Parikh, J., Pillet, G., Grubb, M., Haites, E., Hourcade, J. C., Parikh, K. and Yamin, F.: 1996, in Climate Change 1995, Economic and Social Dimensions of Climate Change, J. J. Houghton et al., Cambridge University Press, New York, pp. 53–77.Google Scholar
  2. Andronova, N. G. and Schlesinger, M. E.: 2001, ‘Objective Estimation of the probability Density Function for Climate Sensitivity’, J. Geophys. Res. 106(D19) 22,605–22,612.Google Scholar
  3. Bankes, S. C.: 1993, ‘Exploratory Modeling for Policy Analysis’, Oper. Res. 41(3), 435–449.Google Scholar
  4. Ben-Haim, Y.: 2001, Information-Gap Decision Theory: Decisions Under Severe Uncertainty, Academic Press, 330 pp.Google Scholar
  5. Forest, C. E., Stone, P. H., Sokolov, A. P., Allen, M. R., and Webster, M.: 2001, Quantifying Uncertainties in Climate System Properties Using Recent Climate Observations, Cambridge, Mass., MIT Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change, p.15.Google Scholar
  6. Giles, J.: 2002, ‘When doubt is a sure thing’, Nature 418, 476–478.Google Scholar
  7. Gritsevskyi, A. and Nakicenovic, N.: 2000, ‘Modeling Uncertainty of Induced Technological Change’, Energy Policy 28(13), 907–921. (ISSN 0301-4215). Reprinted as RR-00-24, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg, Austria.Google Scholar
  8. Herrick, C. and Sarewitz, D.: 2000, ‘Ex Post Evaluation: A More Effective Role for Scientific Assessment in Environmental Policy’, Sci. Technol. Hum. Values 25, 309.Google Scholar
  9. Houghton, J. T., Ding, Y., Griggs, D. J., Noguer, M., van der Linden, P. J., Dai, X., Maskell, K., and Johnson, C. A.: Climate Change 2001, The Scientific Basis, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
  10. Jaeger, C., Renn, O., Rosa, E., and Webler, T.: 1998, ‘Decision Analysis and Rational Action’, in Rayner, S. and Malone, E. L. (eds.), Human Choice and Climate Change, Vol. 3, Battelle Press, Columbus, OH, pp. 141–216.Google Scholar
  11. Jasanoff, S. and Wynne, B.: 1998, ‘Science and Decision Making’, in Rayner, S. and Malone, E. (eds.), Human Choice and Climate Change,Vol. 1, Battle Press, Columbus, Ohio, pp. 1–87.Google Scholar
  12. Kahneman, D., Slovic, P. and Tversky, A.: 1982, Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases, Cambridge University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  13. Lempert, R. J., Popper, S. W., and Bankes, S. C.: 2002, ‘Confronting Surprise’, Soc. Sci. Comput. Rev. 20(4), 420–440.Google Scholar
  14. Lempert, R. J., Popper, S. W., and Bankes, S. C.: 2003, Shaping the Next One Hundred Years: New Methods for Quantitative, Long-Term Policy Analysis, RAND, MR-1626-RPC.Google Scholar
  15. Lempert, R. J. and Schlesinger, M. E.: 2002, ‘Adaptive Strategies for Climate Change’, in: Watts, R. (ed.), Innovative Energy Strategies for CO2 Stabilization, Cambridge University Press, UK, p. 468. (Reproduction of Figure 2 with permission of Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
  16. Metlay, D.: 2000, ‘From Tin Roof to Torn Wet Blanket: Predicting and Observing Groundwater Movement at a Proposed Nuclear Waste Site’, in Sarewitz, D., Pielke, Jr., R., and Byerly, Jr., R. (eds.), Prediction: Science, Decision Making, and the Future of Nature,Island Press, Covelo, CA. pp. 199–228.Google Scholar
  17. Metz, B., Davidson, O., Swart, R., and Pan, J. (eds.): 2001, Climate Change 2001: Mitigation, contribution ofWorking Group III to the Third Assessment[TAR] Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. Section 10.1.5Google Scholar
  18. Morgan, M. G. and Henrion, M.: 1990, Uncertainty: Guide to Dealing with Uncertainty in Quantitative Risk and Policy Analysis,Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
  19. Moss, R. H. and Schneider, S. H.: 2000, ‘Uncertainties in the IPCC TAR: Recommendations to Lead Authors for More Consistent Assessment and Reporting’, in Pachuani, R., Tanaka, K. and Taniguchi, T. (eds.), Guidance Papers on the Cross Cutting Issues of the Third Assessment Report of the IPCC,Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Geneva, pp. 33–51.Google Scholar
  20. Nakicenovic, N., Alcamo, J., Davis, G., de Vries, B., Fenhann, J., Gaffin, S., Gregory, K., Grübler, A. et al.: 2000, Special Report on Emissions Scenarios, Working Group III, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 595 pp. (ISBN 0 521 80493 0) (http://www.grida.no/climate/ipcc/emission/index.htm).Google Scholar
  21. Nakicenovic, N. and Riahi, K.: 2002, An Assessment of Technological Change Across Selected Energy Scenarios,RR-02-005, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg, Austria.Reprinted from Energy Technologies for the Twenty-First Century,World Energy Council, WEC, August 2001.Google Scholar
  22. Rayner, S.: 2000, ‘Prediction and Other Approaches to Climate Change Policy’, in Sarewitz, D., Pielke, Jr., R., and Byerly Jr., R. (eds.), Prediction: Science, Decision Making, and the Future of Nature, Island Press, Washington, DC, pp. 269–296.Google Scholar
  23. Rayner, S. and Malone, E. L.: 1998, ‘Ten Suggestions for Policymakers’, in Rayner, S. and Malone, E. L. (eds.), Human Choice and Climate Change, Vol. 4, Battelle Press, Columbus, Ohio, pp. 109–138.Google Scholar
  24. Sarewitz, D., Pielke, R. A. Jr., and Byerly, R. (eds.): 2000, Prediction: Science, Decision Making, and the Future of Nature, Island Press.Google Scholar
  25. van Asselt, M. B. A.: 2000, Perspectives on Uncertainty and Risk. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  26. Webster, M., Forest, C., Reilly, J., Babiker, M., Kicklighter, D., Mayer, M., Prinn, R., Sarofim, M., Sokolov, A., Stone, P., and Wang, C.:2003, Uncertainty Analysis of Climate Change and Policy Response, Clim. Change 61, 295–320.Google Scholar
  27. Whitehead, A. N.: 1929, Process and Reality,New York, Harper Brothers, cited and discussed in Daly, H.: 1991, Steady-State Economics: Island Press, Washington, DC, pp. 280–287.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert Lempert
    • 1
  • Nebojsa Nakicenovic
    • 2
  • Daniel Sarewitz
    • 3
  • Michael Schlesinger
    • 4
  1. 1.RANDSanta MonicaU.S.A.
  2. 2.International Institute for Applied Systems AnalysisA-2361 Laxenburg and Vienna University of TechnologyViennaAustria
  3. 3.Arizona State UniversityConsortium for Science, Policy, and OutcomesTempeU.S.A
  4. 4.Department of Atmospheric SciencesUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignUrbanaU.S.A

Personalised recommendations