Climatic Change

, Volume 62, Issue 1–3, pp 217–232

Changes in Snowmelt Runoff Timing in Western North America under a `Business as Usual' Climate Change Scenario

  • Iris T. Stewart
  • Daniel R. Cayan
  • Michael D. Dettinger
Article

Abstract

Spring snowmelt is the most important contribution of many rivers in western North America. If climate changes, this contribution may change. A shift in the timing of springtime snowmelt towards earlier in the year already is observed during 1948–2000 in many western rivers. Streamflow timingchanges for the 1995–2099 period are projected using regression relationsbetween observed streamflow-timing responses in each river, measured by the temporal centroid of streamflow (CT) each year, and local temperature (TI) and precipitation (PI) indices. Under 21st century warming trends predicted by the Parallel Climate Model (PCM) under business-as-usual greenhouse-gas emissions, streamflow timing trends across much of western North America suggest even earlier springtime snowmelt than observed to date. Projected CT changes are consistent with observed rates and directions of change during the past five decades, and are strongest in the Pacific Northwest, Sierra Nevada, and Rocky Mountains, where many rivers eventually run 30–40 daysearlier. The modest PI changes projected by PCM yield minimal CT changes. The responses of CT to the simultaneous effects of projected TI and PI trends are dominated by the TI changes. Regression-based CT projections agree with those from physically-based simulations of rivers in the Pacific Northwest and Sierra Nevada.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Augado, E., Cayan, D., Riddle, L., and Roos, M.: 1992, ‘Climatic Fluctuations and the Timing of West Coast Streamflow’, J. Climate 5, 1468–1481.Google Scholar
  2. Cayan, D. R., Kammerdiener, S. A., Dettinger, M. D., Caprio, J. M., and Peterson, D. H.: 2001, ‘Changes in the Onset of Spring in the Western United States’, Bull. Amer. Meteorol. Soc. 82, 399–415.Google Scholar
  3. Dai, A., Wigley, T. M. L., Boville, B. A., Kiehl, J. T., and Buja, L. E.: 2001, ‘Climates of the Twentieth and Twenty-First Centuries Simulated by the NCAR Climate System Model’, J. Climate, 14, 485–519.Google Scholar
  4. Dettinger, M. D. and Cayan, D. R.: 1995, ‘Large-Scale Atmospheric Forcing of Recent Trends toward Early Snowmelt Runoff in California’, J. Climate 8, 606–623.Google Scholar
  5. Dettinger, M. D., Cayan, D. R., Meyer, M. K., and Jeton, A. E.: 2004, ‘Simulated Hydrologic Responses to Climate Variations and Change in the Merced, Carson, and American River Basins, Sierra Nevada, California, 1900–2099’, Clim. Change 62, 283–317.Google Scholar
  6. Eischeid, J. K., Baker, C. B., Karl, T. R., and Diaz, H. F.: 1995, ‘The Quality Control of Long-Term Climatological Data Using Objective Data Analysis’, J. Appl. Meteorol. 34, 2787–2795.Google Scholar
  7. Leavesley, G. H., Lichty, R. W., Troutman, B. M., and Saindon, L. G.: 1983, ‘Precipitation-Runoff Modeling System: User's Manual’, U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 83-4238, 207 pp.Google Scholar
  8. Maurer, E. P., Wood, A. W., Adam, J. C., Lettenmaier, D. P., and Nijssen, B.: 2002, ‘A Long-Term Hydrologically-Based Data Set of Land Surface Fluxes and States for the Conterminous United States’, J. Climate 15, 3237–3251.Google Scholar
  9. Payne, J. T., Wood, A.W., Hamlet, A. F., Palmer, R. N., and Lettenmaier, D. P.: 2004, ‘Mitigating the Effects of Climate Change on the Water Resources of the Columbia River Basin’, Clim. Change 62, 233–256.Google Scholar
  10. Pupacko, A.: 1993, ‘Variations in Northern Sierra Nevada Streamflow: Implications of Climate Change’, Wat. Resour. Bull. 29, 283–290.Google Scholar
  11. Roos, M.: 1987, ‘Possible Changes in California Snowmelt Patterns’, Proc., 4th Pacific Climate Workshop, Pacific Grove, California, 22–31.Google Scholar
  12. Roos, M.: 1991, ‘A Trend of Decreasing Snowmelt Runoff in Northern California’, Proc., 59th Western Snow Conference, Juneau, Alaska, 29–36.Google Scholar
  13. Slack, J. R. and Landwehr, J. M.: 1992, ‘Hydro-Climatic Data network (HCDN): A U.S. Geological Survey Streamflow Data Set for the United States for the Study of Climate Variations, 1874-1988’, U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 92-129, 193 pp.Google Scholar
  14. Stewart, I. T., Cayan, D. R., and Dettinger, M. D.: 2003, ‘Changes towards Earlier Streamflow Timing across Western North America’, in preparation.Google Scholar
  15. Wahl, K. L.: 1992, ‘Evaluation of Trends in Runoff in the Western United States’, AWRA, Managing Water Resources during Global Change, 701–710.Google Scholar
  16. Washington, W. M., Weatherly, J. W., Meehl, G. A., Semtner, A. J., Bettge, T.W., Craig, A. P., Strand, W. G., Arblaster, J., Wayland, V. B., James, R., and Zhang, Y.: 2000, ‘Parallel Climate Model (PCM) Control and Transient Simulations’, Clim. Dyn. 16, 755–774.Google Scholar
  17. Wood, A.W., Leung, L. R., Sridhar, V., and D. P. Lettenmaier, D. P.: 2004. ‘Hydrologic Implications of Dynamical and Statistical Approaches to Downscaling Climate Model Surface Temperature and Precipitation Fields’, Clim. Change 62, 189–216.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Iris T. Stewart
    • 1
  • Daniel R. Cayan
    • 1
    • 2
  • Michael D. Dettinger
    • 2
    • 1
  1. 1.Scripps Institution of OceanographyLa JollaU.S.A.
  2. 2.U.S. Geological SurveyLa JollaU.S.A

Personalised recommendations