Advertisement

Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

After-School Care: Child Outcomes and Recommendations for Research and Policy

Abstract

With increases in family employment rates, there is growing interest in how children spend their time after school. This paper reviews the current research literature on relative care, non-relative care, after-school programs, and self-care for school age children with special attention paid to child outcomes from participation in various after school care arrangements. Research shows mixed findings regarding relations between type of after-school care and child outcome. The use of self-care is not associated with negative child outcomes for predominantly Caucasian children within rural and suburban populations. Different outcomes for self-care are found, however, within urban and minority communities. For low-income families, positive effects from participation in formal after-school programs are found. Major policy recommendations are: (1) to increase federal funding available for after-school programs; (2) to set standards for programs; (3) to involve the community in administering after-school programs, and (4) to make more information regarding after-school care options available to parents.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Afterschool Alliance (January 2000). Afterschool alert: Poll report. Retrieved March 10, 2002, from http://www.mott.org/publications/pdf/afterschool_pollreport2000.pdf.

  2. Belle, D. (1997). Varieties of self-care: A qualitative look at children's experiences in the after-school hours. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 43, 478–496.

  3. Brimhall, D. W., Reaney, L. M., & West, J. (1999). Participation of kindergartners through third-graders in before-and after-school care. National Center for Education Statistics: Statistics in Brief. Washington DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement.

  4. Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Department of Labor. (2000). Labor force participation: 75 years of change 1950-1998 and 1998-2025. Washington, DC: Author.

  5. Cain, V. S., & Hoerth, S. L. (1989). Parental choice of self-care for school-age children. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 51, 65–77.

  6. Coleman, M., Rowland, B., & Robinson, B. (1989). Latchkey children and school-age child care: A review of programming needs. Child and Youth Care Quarterly, 18, 39–48.

  7. Committee on Labor and Human Resources. (1998). Non-school hours: Mobilizing school and community resources. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.

  8. Diamond, J. M., Kataria, S., & Messer, S. C. (1989). Latchkey children: A pilot study investigating behavior and academic achievement. Child and Youth Care Quarterly, 18, 131–140.

  9. Fight Crime/Invest in Kids. (1997). After school crime or after school programs: Report to the U.S. Attorney General. Washington, D. C.: Fight Crime/Invest in Kids.

  10. Finn-Stevenson, M., & Zigler, E. F. (1999). Schools of the 21st century: Linking child care and education. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

  11. Galambos, N. L., & Garbarino, J. (1985). Adjustment of unsupervised children in a rural setting. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 146, 227–231.

  12. Hunts, H. H., & Avery, R. J. (1998). Relatives as child care givers: After hours support for nontraditional workers. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 19, 315–341.

  13. Laird, R. D., Pettit, G. S., Dodge, K. A., & Bates, J. E. (1998). The social ecology of school-age child care. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 19, 341–360.

  14. Lovko, A. M., & Ullman, D. G. (1989). Research on the adjustment of latchkey children: Role of background/demographic and latchkey situation variables. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 18}, 16–2

  15. Child & Youth Care Forum 346. Marshall, N. L., Coll, C. G., Marx, F., McCartney, K., Keefe, N., & Ruh, J. (1997). After-school time and children's behavioral adjustment. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 43, 497–514.

  16. Messer, S. C., Wuensch, K. L., & Diamond, J. M. (1989). Former latchkey children: Personality and academic correlates. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 150, 301–309.

  17. Miller, B. M. (1995). How children spend out-of-school time. Child Care Bulletin, March/April, (2). Retrieved March 17, 2002, from http://ericps.crc.uiuc.edu/nccic/ ccb/ccb-ma95/outofsch.html.

  18. Miller, B. M., O'Connor, S., & Sirignano, S. W. (1995). Out-of-school time: A study of children in three low-income neighborhoods. Child Welfare, 74, 1249–1280.

  19. Morrison, G. M., Storino, M. H., Robertson, L. M., Weissglass, T., & Dondero, A. (2000). The protective function of after-school programming and parent education and support for students at risk for substance abuse. Evaluation and Program Planning, 23, 365–371.

  20. National Center for Education Statistics (NCES). (1997). School serving family needs: Extended-day programs in public and private schools. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.

  21. National Institute on Out-of-School Time. (2001). Fact sheet on school-age children's out-of-school time. National Institute on Out-of-School Time, Center for Research on Women, Wellesley College. Retrieved March 17, 2002, from http://www.niost.org/ factsheet.pdf.

  22. Pettit, G. S., Laird, R. D., Bates, J. E., & Dodge, K. A. (1997). Patterns of after-school care in middle childhood: Risk factors and developmental outcomes. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 43, 515–538.

  23. Pierce, K. M., Hamm, J. V., & Vandell, D. L. (1999). Experiences in after-school pro-grams and children's adjustment in first-grade classrooms. Child Development, 70, 756–767.

  24. Posner, J. K., & Vandell, D. L. (1994). Low-income children's after-school care: Are there beneficial effects of after-school programs. Child Development, 65, 440–456.

  25. Powell, D. R., & Widdows, R. (1987). Social and economic factors associated with parents' decisions about after-school child care: An exploratory study in a medium-sized community. Child and Youth Care Quarterly, 16, 272–28

  26. Rodman, H., Pratto, D. J., & Nelson, R. S. (1985). Child care arrangements and chil-dren's functioning: A comparison of self-care and adult-care children. Developmental Psychology, 21, 413–418.

  27. Roffman, J. G., Pagano, M. E., & Hirsch, B. J. (2001). Youth functioning and experiences in inner-city after-school programs among age, gender, and race groups. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 10, 85–100.

  28. Schwendiman, J., & Fager, J. (1999). After-school programs: Good for kids, good for communities (Report No. RIK65325). Portland, OR: Northwest Regional Educa-tional Lab. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED431844)

  29. Seligson, M. (2001). School-age child care today. Young Children, 56, 90–94.

  30. Seligson, M., Genser, A., Gannett, E., & Gray, W. (1983). School-age child care: A policy report. Wellesley, MA: School-Age Child Care Project, Wellesley College Center for Research on Women.

  31. Seppanen, P. S., Love, J. M., DeVries, D. K., Bernstein, L., Seligson, M., Marx, F., & Kisker, E. E. (1993). National Study of Before-and After-School Programs: Final report. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Policy and Planning.

  32. Shulman, S., Kedem, P., Kaplan, K. J., Sever, I., & Braja, M. (1998). Latchkey children: Potential sources of support. Journal of Community Psychology, 26, 185–197.

  33. Steinberg, L. (1986). Latchkey children and susceptibility to peer pressure: An ecological analysis. Developmental Psychology, 22, 433–439.

  34. Telephone Counseling and Referral Service. (2001). Is my child ready to be home alone? Retrieved April 27, 2002, from http://www.tcrs211.org/phonefriend/ready.htm.

  35. occa40.pdf}.

  36. U.S. Department of Education. (2001). After-school programs: Keeping children safe and smart. Washington, DC: Author.

  37. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation. (1999). Trends in the well-being of America's children and youth. Washington, DC: Author.

  38. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation. (2000). Trends in the well-being of America's children and youth. Washington, DC: Author.

  39. Vandell, D. L., & Corasaniti, M. A. (1988). The relation between third graders' after-school care and social, academic, and emotional functioning. Child Development, 59, 868–875.

  40. Vandell, D. L., & Su, H. (1999). Child care and school-age children. Young Children, 54(6), 62–71.

  41. Zigler, E. F., Finn-Stevenson, M., & Marsland, K. W. (1995). Child day care in the schools: The school of the 21st century. Child Welfare, 74, 1301–1326.

Download references

Author information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sarampote, N.C., Bassett, H.H. & Winsler, A. After-School Care: Child Outcomes and Recommendations for Research and Policy. Child & Youth Care Forum 33, 329–348 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:CCAR.0000043039.79476.e9

Download citation

  • after-school policy
  • school-age children
  • child care