Cell and Tissue Banking

, Volume 4, Issue 2–4, pp 147–150

Use of Irradiated Amnion as a Biological Dressing in the Treatment of Radiation Induced Ulcers



The management of moist skin desquamation (ulceration) following radiation therapy has been a concern since the inception of this therapy. The treatment of skin reactions focuses on promoting healing, improving patient comfort preventing infection and decreasing trauma to the area. Various dressings like topical preparations, hydrocolloid and gentian violet 1 % dressing have been used for its treatment. We present our experience with the use of amnion as a biological dressing in patients with radiation induced ulceration following pelvic radiation using megavoltage beam. The preliminary experience with treatment in 14 patients proved to be cost effective due to a shorter duration of ulcer healing (median of 7 days), fewer dressing changes (median of 4 dressings) and diminished use of analgesics.

amnion biological dressing post radiation ulceration 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Agren MS, Franzen L and Chvapil M (1993) Effects on wound healing of zinc oxide in a hydrocolloid dressing. J AmAcad Dermatol 29(2.1): 221-227.Google Scholar
  2. Banks V, Bale S and Harding K et al. (1997) Evaluation of a new polyurethane foam dressing. J Wound Care 6(6): 266-269Google Scholar
  3. Bari MM and Begum R (1999) Use of radiation-sterilised amniotic membrane grafts as temporary biological dressings for the treatment of leprotic ulcers. In: Phillips GO, Strong DM, von Versen R and Nather A (eds) Advances in Tissue Banking, Vol 3, pp 477-483. World ScientificGoogle Scholar
  4. Bennett JP, Matthews R and Faulk WP (1980) Treatment of chronic ulceration of the legs with human amnion. Lancet 1: 1153-1156Google Scholar
  5. Bentzen SH, Overgaard M and Thames et al. (1989) Hodgkin's disease. Early and late normal tissue injury after post mastectomy radiotherapy alone or combined with chemotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 56: 711-715Google Scholar
  6. Burgos H (1983) Angiogenic and growth promoting factors in human amnio-chorion and placenta. Eur J Clin Invest 13: 289Google Scholar
  7. Burgos H (1986) Angiogenic factor from human term placenta: Purification and partial characterisation. Eur J Clin Invest 16: 486Google Scholar
  8. Colocho G, Graham WP, Greene AE, Matheson DW and Lynch D (1971) Human amniotic membrane as a physiologic wound dressing. Arch Surg 109: 370-373Google Scholar
  9. D'Angio GJ, Faber S and Maddock CL (1959) Potentiation of x-ray effects by actinomycin D. Radiology 73(2): 175-180Google Scholar
  10. Dini D, Macchia R and Gozza A et al. (1993) Management of acute radiodermatitis. Pharmacological or nonpharmacological remedies? Cancer Nurs 16(5): 366-370Google Scholar
  11. Dutreix J (1986) Human skin. Early and late reactions in relation to dose and its time distribution. Br J Radiol 59(19): 2-3Google Scholar
  12. Faulk WP, Matthews RN, Stevens PJ, Bennett JP, Burgos H and Hsi B (1980) Human amnion as an adjunct in wound healing. Lancet 1: 1156-1158Google Scholar
  13. Hansson C (1997) Interactive wound dressings. A practical guide to their use in older patients. Drugs Aging 11(4): 271-284Google Scholar
  14. Hoque F, Muldoon S, Rahman S and Islam M (1999) An initial study of pressure sore management with amniotic membrane dressing. In: Phillips GO, Strong DM, von Versen R and Nather A (eds) Advances in Tissue Banking, Vol 3, pp 491-493. World ScientificGoogle Scholar
  15. Kumar A, Singh R, Dass P, Chauhan US and Kumar P (2000) Microbiological studies and applications of radiation sterilised human amniotic membrane, pp 189-191, NAC 2000, Mumbai, March 2000Google Scholar
  16. Lin SN, Lai CS, Hou MF and Yang C (1985) Amnion overlay skin autografts. Burns 11: 374-378Google Scholar
  17. Lobo Gajiwala A (2003) Setting up a Tissue Bank in India: The Tata Memorial Hospital Experience. Cell and Tissue Banking (this issue)Google Scholar
  18. Maral T, Borman H, Arslan H, Demirhan B, Akinbingol G and Haberal M (1999) Effectiveness of human amnion preserved longterm in glycerol as a temporary biological dressing. Burns 25: 625-635Google Scholar
  19. Margolin SG, Breneman JC and Denman DL et al. (1990) Management of radiation induced moist desquamation using hydrocolloid dressing. Cancer Nurs 13(2): 71-80Google Scholar
  20. Mayer EG, Poulter CA and Aristizabal SA (1976) Complication of irradiation related to apparent drug potentiation by adriamycin. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1: 1179-1188Google Scholar
  21. Patwardhan A, Sharma V and Dinshaw KA (2002). Duoderm CGF vs Gentian Violet 1% dressing in treatment of radiation induced ulcers. WCET J 22(2): 32-38Google Scholar
  22. Ramakrishnan KM and Jayaraman V (1997) Management of partial thickness burn wounds by amniotic membrane: A cost effective treatment in developing countries. Burns 23(1): 33-36Google Scholar
  23. Rao TV and Chandrasekharam V (1981) Use of dry human and bovine amnion as a biological dressing. Arch Surg 116: 891-896Google Scholar
  24. Rejzek A, Weyer F, Eichberger R and Gebhart W (2001) Physical changes of amniotic membranes through glycerolisation for the use as an epidermal substitute: Light and electron microscope studies. Cell Tissue Bank 2: 95-102Google Scholar
  25. Roberts DB and Travis EL (1995) Acemannan containing wound dressing gel reduces radiation induced skin reaction in C3h mice. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 32(4): 1047-1052Google Scholar
  26. Robson MC and Krizek TJ (1973) The effect of human amniotic membranes on the bacterial population of infected rat burns. Ann Surg 177(2): 144-149Google Scholar
  27. Robson MC, Sanburg JL and Krizek TJ (1973) Amniotic membranes as a temporary wound dressing. Surg Gynecol Obstet 136: P 904Google Scholar
  28. Rodier-Bruant C, Keller P, Hermans D, Stricher R, Geiger D, Manunta A and Wilk A (1992) The use of sorbsan in the treatment of the donor site of skin transplantations. Minerva Chir 47(11): 995-999Google Scholar
  29. Rothman PA, Wiskind AK and Dudley AG (1990) Amniotic membranes in the treatment of necrotising fasciitis complicating vulvar herpes virus infection. Obstet Gynaec 76(3): 534-536Google Scholar
  30. Sato Y, Morita M and Takahashi H et al. (1970) Combined surgery, radiotherapy, and regional chemotherapy in carcinoma of the paranasal sinuses. Cancer 25: 571-579Google Scholar
  31. See A, Wright S and Denham JW (1998) Apilot study of dermofilm in acute radiation-induced desquamative skin reactions. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 10(3): 182-185Google Scholar
  32. Shimm DS and Canady JR (1994) The Skin. In: Fox JD (ed) Moss Radiation Oncology Rationale, Technique, Results. 7th edition, pp 99-100, chapter 4, The CV Mosby Company. St. Louis, Missouri, U.S.A.Google Scholar
  33. Smith DS and Chamorro TP (1978) Nursing care of patients undergoing combination chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Cancer Nurs 1: 129-134Google Scholar
  34. Subrahmanyam M (1995) Amniotic membrane as a cover or microskin grafts. Br J Plast Surg 48: 477-478Google Scholar
  35. Talmi YP, Sigler L, Inge E, Kinkelstein Y and Zohar Y (1991) Antibacterial properties of human amniotic membranes. Placenta 12: 285-288Google Scholar
  36. Walker AB, Looney DR and Allen JE (1977) Use of fresh amnion as a burn dressing. J Pediatr Surg 92: 391-395Google Scholar
  37. Ward DJ and Bennett JP (1984) The long-term results of the use of human amnion in the treatment of leg ulcers. Br J Plast Surg 37: 191-193Google Scholar
  38. Ward DJ, Bennett JP, Burgos H and Fabre J (1989) The healing of chronic venous leg ulcers with prepared human amnion Br J Plast Surg 42: 463-467Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Tissue BankTata Memorial HospitalParel, MumbaiIndia
  2. 2.Department of Radiation OncologyTata Memorial HospitalParel, MumbaiIndia

Personalised recommendations