Cancer Causes & Control

, Volume 15, Issue 6, pp 601–609 | Cite as

Racial Differences in Oral and Pharyngeal Cancer Treatment and Survival in Florida

  • Scott L. Tomar
  • Michael Loree
  • Henrietta Logan


Objective: This study examined racial differences in treatment and survival for blacks and whites in Florida diagnosed with oral or pharyngeal cancer.

Methods: Data for 21,481 malignancies of the oral cavity or pharynx diagnosed from 1988 to 1998 were derived from the Florida Cancer Data System. Type of cancer treatment was compared by race, stratified by anatomic site and summary stage at diagnosis. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used to compare survival rates and Cox regression models were used to estimate hazard ratios for race. Covariates included age, sex, census tract income, and treatment.

Results: Stratifying by tumor site and stage, blacks consistently had poorer survival rates than whites. Across tumor stages, blacks with oral cavity cancer were consistently more likely than whites to have received only radiotherapy and less likely to have received cancer-directed surgery. Trends were similar for pharyngeal cancer, although statistically significant only for regional stages. Across site and stage, blacks consistently had elevated hazard ratios (range: 1.20–1.53) relative to whites.

Conclusions: In Florida, there were racial differences in patient treatment for oral or pharyngeal cancer. Blacks had lower survival rates than whites, but differences in treatment did not entirely account for racial disparities in survival.

disparities epidemiology mouth neoplasms race survival 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Ries LAG, Eisner MP, Kosary CL, et al., eds. (2003) SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975–2000. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    U.S. Cancer Statistics Working Group (2002) United States Cancer Statistics: 1999 Incidence. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Caplan DJ, Hertz-Picciotto I (1998) Racial differences in survival of oral and pharyngeal cancer patients in North Carolina. J Public Health Dent 58: 36–43.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Moore RJ, Doherty DA, Do KA, Chamberlain RM, Khuri FR (2001) Racial disparity in survival of patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity and pharynx.Ethn Health 6: 165–177.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Shavers VL, Harlan LC, Winn D, Davis WW (2003) Racial/ethnic patterns of care for cancers of the oral cavity, pharynx, larynx, sinuses, and salivary glands. Cancer Metastasis Rev 22: 25–38.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Arbes SJ Jr, Olshan AF, Caplan DJ, Schoenbach VJ, Slade GD, Symons MJ (1999) Factors contributing to the poorer survival of black Americans diagnosed with oral cancer (United States). Cancer Causes Control 10(6): 513–523.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    National Cancer Institute (2003) Number of persons by race and Hispanic ethnicity for SEER participants (2000 Census data). Accessed August 1, 2003 at: data.html.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kaufman JS, Cooper RS (1999) Seeking causal explanations in social epidemiology. Am J Epidemiol 150: 113–120.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Al-Othman MO, Morris CG, Logan HL, Hinerman RW, Amdur RJ, Mendenhall WM (2003). Impact of race on outcome after definitive radiotherapy for squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Cancer 98: 2467–2472.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Greenwald HP, Polissar NL, Borgatta EF, McCorkle R (1994) Detecting survival effects of socioeconomic status: problems in the use of aggregate measures. J Clin Epidemiol 47: 903–909.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Geronimus AT, Bound J (1998). Use of census-based aggregate variables to proxy for socioeconomic group: evidence from national samples. Am J Epidemiol 148:475–486.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Krieger N (1992) Overcoming the absence of socioeconomic data in medical records: validation and application of a census-based methodology. Am J Public Health 82: 703–710.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Anderson RT, Sorlie P, Backlund E, Johnson N, Kaplan GA (1997) Mortality effects of community socioeconomic status. Epidemiology 8: 42–47.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cooper RS, Kennelly JF, Durazo-Arvizu R, Oh HJ, Kaplan G, Lynch J (2001). Relationship between premature mortality and socioeconomic factors in black and white populations of US metropolitan areas. Public Health Rep 116: 464–473.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kwok RK, Yankaskas BC (2001) The use of census data for determining race and education as SES indicators: a validation study. Ann Epidemiol 11: 171–177.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Scott L. Tomar
    • 1
  • Michael Loree
    • 2
  • Henrietta Logan
    • 2
  1. 1.Division of Public Health Services and ResearchUniversity of Florida College of DentistryGainesvilleUSA
  2. 2.Division of Public Health Services and ResearchUniversity of Florida College of DentistryGainesvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations