Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 54, Issue 1, pp 1–15 | Cite as

Ethics, Equity, and Social Justice in The New Economic Order: Using Financial Information for Keeping Social Score

  • Appa Rao Korukonda
  • Chenchu Ramaiah T. Bathala

Abstract

In the present world order unbridled forces of free market capitalism are frequently cited for much of the social injustice, inequity, and disparity of wealth between the rich and the poor. Although history's verdict in favor of the free markets could hardly be harsher or clearer, it is clear that after the initial wave of triumph, the free market paradigm has developed some cracks in its façade. What marks the trail of such sustained and pronounced move toward free markets in terms of ethics, morality, social welfare and social justice? How does one keep a social score in this seemingly relentless and irreversible move all over the world toward free market capitalism?

In this paper we shall attempt to address these and related questions. Drawing on concepts from organization theory and social philosophy and using publicly available financial information, we shall illustrate how, amidst the myriad and mixed noises, some sense of order and signal can be discerned in addressing issues of equity and social justice. Toward this end, first, we provide a broad contrast between two models of financial markets: the command model and the free market model and proceed to examine publicly available financial information and analyze the trends and patterns with graphical representations using publicly available data from Handbook of International Economic Statistics. Next, we explore the implications of financial performance measures for social welfare and social justice and discuss the social perils of free markets using the Mexican and Asian Financial crises as the focal points. Finally, we present a set of recommendations for smoother structural transition.

ethics equity financial information 

References

  1. Aharoni, Y.: 1986, The Evolution and Management of State-Owned Enterprises (Ballinger, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  2. Bathala, C. and A. R. Korukonda: 2003, 'An analysis of social welfare issues in free market environments', International Journal of Social Economics 30(8), 854–866.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bennett, J. T. and M. H. Johnson: 1979, 'Public versus Private Provision of Collective Goods and Services: Garbage Collection Revisited', Public Choice 34, 55–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boardman, A. E. and A. R. Vining: 1989, 'Ownership and Performance in Competitive Environments: A Comparison of the Performance of Private, Mixed, and State-Owned Enterprises', Journal of Law and Economics 32(April), 1–36.Google Scholar
  5. Boycko, M., A. Shleifer and R. W. Vishny: 1993, A Theory of Privatization (Harvard University, Boston).Google Scholar
  6. Caves, D. W. and L. R. Christensen: 1980, 'The Relative Efficiency of Public and Private Firms in a Competitive Environment: The Case of the Canadian Railroads', Journal of Public Economy 88, 958–976.Google Scholar
  7. Fernandez, R. B. and L. Schumacher: 1998, 'The Mexican Financial Crisis Of 1994-1995: An Asymmetric Information Analysis', in S. S. Rehman (ed.), Financial Crisis Management in Regional Blocs. (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston/Dordrecht/London), pp. 184–208.Google Scholar
  8. Financial Crises, Causes, and Indicators: A Survey by the Staff of the International Monetary Fund, World Economic Outlook (May 1998): International Monetary Fund, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  9. Financial Turbulence and the World Economy: A Survey by the Staff of the International Monetary Fund, World Economic Outlook (October 1998): International Monetary Fund, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  10. Galal, A., L. Jones, P. Tandon and I. Vogelsang: 1994, Welfare Consequences of Selling Public Enterprises: An Empirical Analysis. The World Bank (Oxford University Press, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
  11. Greenwood, J. and S. Ogus: 1992, As summarized in The Economist: Asian Economies: Freedom pays.Google Scholar
  12. Gupta, N.: 2001, Partial Privatization and Firm Performance: Evidence from India, Working paper.Google Scholar
  13. Henriot, P. J.: 1989, 'Forgive us our debts' America, December 9, pp. 420–424.Google Scholar
  14. Korukonda, A. R.: 1999, 'Policy Imperatives for the International Economy and for Financial Markets in the Emerging World Order', International Journal of Value-Based Management 12, 51–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lux, K.: 1990, Adam Smith's Mistake: How a Moral Philosopher Invented Economics and Ended Morality (Shambhala, Boston).Google Scholar
  16. McKinnon, R.: 1993, 'Financial Growth and Macroeconomic Stability in China, 1978-1992: Implications for Russia and Eastern Europe', The Order of Economic Liberalization: Financial Control in the Transition to a Market Economy (John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore and London).Google Scholar
  17. Merton, R.: 1968, 'The Matthew Effect in Science: The Reward and Communication Systems of Science are Considered', Science 159(3810), 56–63.Google Scholar
  18. Mishkin, F. S.: 1996, 'Understanding Financial Crises: A Developing Country Perspective', in Michael Bruno and Boris Pleskovic (eds.), Annual World Bank Conference on Development Economies (The World Bank, Washington, DC), pp. 29–62.Google Scholar
  19. Mishkin, F. S.: 1998, 'The Mexican Financial Crisis Of 1994-1995: An Asymmetric Information Analysis', in S. S. Rehman (ed.), Financial Crisis Management in Regional Blocs. (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston/ Dordrecht/London), pp. 149–181.Google Scholar
  20. Roth, W.: 2002, The Assault on Social Policy (Columbia University Press, New York).Google Scholar
  21. World Economic Outlook (October 1996), The Rise and Fall of Inflation: A Survey by the Staff of the International Monetary Fund (International Monetary Fund, Washington, DC).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Appa Rao Korukonda
    • 1
  • Chenchu Ramaiah T. Bathala
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Computer Information Systems, College of Business, Room 240 Sutliff HallBloomsburg University of PennsylvaniaBloomsburgU.S.A.
  2. 2.Nance College of Business AdministrationCleveland State UniversityClevelandU.S.A

Personalised recommendations