Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 53, Issue 1–2, pp 173–190 | Cite as

New Tools to Foster Corporate Socially Responsible Behavior

  • Antonio Tencati
  • Francesco Perrini
  • Stefano Pogutz


According to the Green Paper presented by the European Commission in July 2001, corporate social responsibility (CSR) is “a concept whereby companies integrate social and environmental concerns in their business operations and in their interaction with their stakeholders on a voluntary basis” (Commission of the European Communities, 2001b, p. 6). On this basis, in 2002, the Italian Government, and especially the Italian Ministry of Welfare, launched an initiative called CSR-SC (social commitment) in order to foster the proactive social role of Italian enterprises, with great attention on SME involvement. The technical partner of the Italian Ministry of Welfare for this initiative is Bocconi University. The goal of this contribution is to present the main results of CSR–SC research project developed by Bocconi University. The paper provides a detailed picture of the general scheme designed to carry out the research project and a review of the different methodologies used to support the solutions proposed.

corporate social responsibility performance indicators social commitment stakeholder groups standard 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Azzone, G., R. Bianchi and G. Noci: 1997, ‘Implementing Environmental Certification in Italy: Managerial and Competitive Implications for Firms’, Eco-Management and Auditing 4, 98–108.Google Scholar
  2. Becattini, G.: 1987, Mercato e Forze Locali: Il Distretto Industriale (il Mulino, Bologna).Google Scholar
  3. Bowen, H. R.: 1953, Social Responsibilities of the Businessman (Harper and Brothers, New York).Google Scholar
  4. Carroll, A. B.: 1999, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility. Evolution of a Definitional Construct’, Business & Society 38(3), 268–295.Google Scholar
  5. CELE (Centre for Ethics, Law & Economics): 2002, The Q-RES Project: The Quality of the Social and Ethical Responsibility of Corporations. Guidelines for Management (Università Cattaneo, Castellanza).Google Scholar
  6. Clarkson, M. B. E.: 1995, ‘A Stakeholder Framework for Analyzing and Evaluating Corporate Social Performance’, Academy of Management Review 20(1), 92–117.Google Scholar
  7. Commission of the European Communities: 2001a, ‘A Sustainable Europe for a Better World: A European Union Strategy for Sustainable Development’, COM (2001) 264 final, Brussels.Google Scholar
  8. Commission of the European Communities: 2001b, ‘Green Paper “Promoting a European Framework for Corporate Social Responsibility”’, COM (2001) 366 final, Brussels.Google Scholar
  9. Commission of the European Communities: 2002a, ‘European SMEs and Social and Environmental Responsibility’, Observatory of European SMEs, Luxembourg, No. 4.Google Scholar
  10. Commission of the European Communities: 2002b, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility: A Business Contribution to Sustainable Development’, COM(2002) 347 final, Brussels.Google Scholar
  11. Drucker, P. F.: 1984, ‘Converting Social Problems into Business Opportunities: The New Meaning of Corporate Social Responsibility’, California Management Review 26(2), 53–63.Google Scholar
  12. Elkington, J.: 1997, Cannibals with Forks. The Triple Bottom Line of 21st Century Business (Capstone Publishing, Oxford).Google Scholar
  13. Ethics Officer Association: 2002, ‘Developing a Business Conduct Guidelines Standard’, in G. Brenkert (ed.), Proceedings of the Transatlantic Business Ethics Conference (Georgetown University, Washington DC).Google Scholar
  14. Friedman, M.: 1962, Capitalism and Freedom (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
  15. Friedman, M.: 1970, ‘The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase its Profits’, New York Times Magazine, 13 September.Google Scholar
  16. GBS (Gruppo di Studio per il Bilancio Sociale): 2001, I Principi di Redazione del Bilancio Sociale (GBS, Milan).Google Scholar
  17. Gilardoni, A. (ed.): 2000, Health, Safety & Environment. Indirizzi strategici e problematiche operative (Egea, Milan).Google Scholar
  18. Global Reporting Initiative (GRI): 2002, 2002 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines, Scholar
  19. Goodman, E., J. Bamford and J. Saynor (eds.): 1989, Small Firms and Industrial Districts in Italy (Routledge, London).Google Scholar
  20. Gulati, R.Google Scholar
  21. N.hriaandA.Zaheer: 2000, ‘Strategic Networks’, Strategic Management Journal 21(special issue), 203–215Google Scholar
  22. ISEA: 1999, AccountAbility 1000 (AA1000) Framework. Standard, Guidelines and Professional Qualification (ISEA, London).Google Scholar
  23. ISEA: 2003, AA1000 Assurance Standard, http:// Scholar
  24. ISO: 1996, ISO 14001: Environmental Management Systems — Specification with Guidance for Use (ISO, Geneva).Google Scholar
  25. Joyner, B. E. and D. Payne: 2002, ‘Evolution and Implementation: A Study of Values, Business Ethics and Corporate Social Responsibility’, Journal of Business Ethics 41, 297–311.Google Scholar
  26. Lanza, S., M. Calcaterra and F. Perrini (eds.): 2001, Etica, Finanza e Valore d'Impresa (Egea, Milan).Google Scholar
  27. Lev, B.: 2001, Intangibles. Management, Measurement, and Reporting (Brookings Institution Press, Washington DC).Google Scholar
  28. Lin, N., K. Cook and R. S. Burt (eds.): 2001, Social Capital. Theory and Research (Aldine de Gruyter, New York).Google Scholar
  29. Lipparini, A.: 2002, La Gestione Strategica del Capitale Intellettuale e del Capitale Sociale (il Mulino, Bologna).Google Scholar
  30. Lipparini, A. and A. Lomi: 1999, ‘Interorganizational Relations in the Modena Biomedical Industry: A Case Study in Local Economic Development’, in A. Grandori (ed.), Interfirm Networks. Organization and Industrial Competitiveness (Routledge, London), pp. 120–150.Google Scholar
  31. Logan, D. and M. Tuffrey: 1999, Companies in Communities: Valuing the Contribution, (Charities Aid Foundation, London).Google Scholar
  32. Mill, R. W. and B. Weinstein: 2000, ‘Beyond Shareholder Value — Reconciling the Shareholder and Stakeholder Perspectives’, Journal of General Management 25(3), 79–93.Google Scholar
  33. Nahapiet, J. and S. Ghoshal: 1998, ‘Social Capital, Intellectual Capital and the Organizational Advantage’, Academy of Management Review 23(2), 242–266.Google Scholar
  34. Pearce, J., P. Raynard and S. Zadek: 1996, Social Auditing for Small Organisations (New Economics Foundation, London).Google Scholar
  35. Perrini, F. (ed.): 2002, Responsabilità Sociale dell'Impresa e Finanza Etica (Egea, Milan).Google Scholar
  36. Perrini, F. and A. Tencati: 2002, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility and Sustainability: the Proposal for a New Corporate Performance Evaluation and Reporting Framework’, in Proceedings of the 5th Annual Corporate Citizenship Unit Research Conference (University of Warwick, Warwick).Google Scholar
  37. Perrini, F. and A. Tencati: 2003, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Performance: Managing Sustainability and the Need of a New Corporate Evaluation and Reporting System in a Knowledge Economy’, Paper presented at the 2003 Academy of Management Conference, Seattle, Washington.Google Scholar
  38. Perrini, F., M. Calcaterra, S. Pogutz and A. Tencati: 2002, ‘Research Project for the Italian Ministry of Welfare. Proposal for a CSR-SC Standard’, in Proceedings of the Conference ‘L'Impegno Sociale delle Imprese per un Nuovo Welfare’ (Bocconi University, Milan), Scholar
  39. Pogutz, S. and A. Tencati: 1998, ‘Il Bilancio Ambientale: Strumento di Controllo e Comunicazione’, in Proceedings of the Conference ‘Ambiente e Competitività’ (Bocconi University, Milan).Google Scholar
  40. Porter, M. E. and M. R. Kramer: 2002, ‘The Competitive Advantage of Corporate Philanthropy’, Harvard Business Review (December), 5–16.Google Scholar
  41. SEAN: 2000, Il Bilancio Sociale: uno Strumento per Valorizzare l'Impresa (KPMG, Milan).Google Scholar
  42. Tencati, A.: 1999, ‘Etica e Responsabilità Ambientale dell'Impresa. La Misurazione della Performance Ecologica dell'Azienda: il Bilancio Sociale e il Bilancio Ambientale’, in L. M. Alfieri and M. L. Fornaciari Davoli (eds.), Etica ed Economia (Mucchi, Modena), pp. 297–319.Google Scholar
  43. Tencati, A.: 2002a, Sostenibilità, Impresa e Performance. Un Nuovo Modello di Evaluation and Reporting (Egea, Milan).Google Scholar
  44. Tencati, A.: 2002b, ‘Managing Sustainability’, in Zsolnai L. (ed.), Ethics in the Economy. Handbook of Business Ethics (Peter Lang Academic Publisher, Oxford and Bern), pp. 187–209.Google Scholar
  45. The Copenhagen Centre: 1998, The Vision Behind The Copenhagen Centre, http://www.copenhagencentre. org.Google Scholar
  46. The European Parliament and the Council: 2001, ‘Regulation (EC) No 761/2001 of 19 March 2001 Allowing Voluntary Participation by Organizations in a Community Eco-Management and Audit Scheme (EMAS)’, Official Journal of the European Communities L 114, (24 April), pp. 1–29.Google Scholar
  47. The SIGMA Project: 2003, The SIGMA Guidelines. Putting Sustainable Development into Practice — A Guide for Organisations, Scholar
  48. Unioncamere and ISVI (Istituto per i Valori d'Impresa): 2003, L'Impegno Sociale delle Piccole e Medie Imprese Italiane, Scholar
  49. United Nations Commission on Human Rights — Sub-Commission on the Promotion and Protection of Human Rights: 2003, ‘Norms on the Responsibilities of Transnational Corporations and Other Business Enterprises with regard to Human Rights’, Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, Geneva, 13 August.Google Scholar
  50. WBCSD (World Business Council for Sustainable Development): 1999, Corporate Social Responsibility. Meeting Changing Expectations, http://www.wbcsd. org.Google Scholar
  51. Weiser, J. and S. Zadek: 2000, Conversations with Disbelievers. Persuading Companies to Address Social Challenges (The Ford Foundation, New York).Google Scholar
  52. Zadek, S., P. Pruzan and R. Evans (eds.): 1997, Building Corporate Accountability: Emerging Practices in Social and Ethical Accounting, Auditing and Reporting (Earthscan, London).Google Scholar
  53. Zsolnai, L.: 2002, ‘New Agenda for Business Ethics’, in L. Zsolnai (ed.), Ethics in the Economy. Handbook of Business Ethics (Peter Lang Academic Publisher, Oxford and Bern), pp. 1–7.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Antonio Tencati
  • Francesco Perrini
  • Stefano Pogutz

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations