Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 52, Issue 2, pp 149–152 | Cite as

The Ethics of Compensation Systems

  • Matt Bloom

Abstract

Compensation systems are an integral part of the relationships organizations establish with their employees. For many years, researchers viewed pay systems as an efficient way to bring market-like labour exchanges inside organizations. This view suggested that only economic considerations matter for understanding how compensation systems effect organizations and their employees. Advances in organizational research, particularly those focused on issues of justice and fairness, suggest that the fully understanding the outcomes of compensation systems requires examining their psychological, social, and moral effects.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Brockner, J., P. A. Siegel, J. P. Daly, T. Tyler and C. Martin: 1997, 'When trust matters: The moderating effect of outcome favorability', Administrative Science Quarterly 42, 558–583.Google Scholar
  2. Browns and Huber: 1992, Journal of Applied Psychology.Google Scholar
  3. Cropanzano, R., Z. S. Byrne, D. R. Bobocel and D. E. Rupp: 2001a, 'Moral virtues, fairness heuristics, social entities, and other denizens of organizational justice', Journal of Vocational Behavior 58, 164–209.Google Scholar
  4. Cropanzano, R., D. E. Rupp, C. J. Mohler and M. Schminke: 2001b, 'Three roads to organizational justice', in G. Ferris (ed.), Research in Personnel and The Ethics of Compensation Systems 151 Human Resource Management, Vol. 20 (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT), pp. 1–113.Google Scholar
  5. Fishman, C: 1999, 'Sanity, Inc.', Fast Company 21, 84–89.Google Scholar
  6. Folger, R. and R. Cropanzano: 1998, Organizational Justice and Human Resource Management (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
  7. Gittell, J. H.: 2003, The Southwest Airlines Way (McGraw Hill, New York).Google Scholar
  8. Greenberg, J. and R. Cropanzano: 2001, Advances in Organizational Justice, (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA).Google Scholar
  9. Lavelle, L.: 2002, Executive compensation. Business Week, April 15, (http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/02_15/b3778012.htm).Google Scholar
  10. Meara, N. M.: 2001, 'Just and virtuous leaders and organizations', Journal of Vocational Behavior 58, 227–234.Google Scholar
  11. Milkovich, G. T. and J. M. Newman: 2005, Compensation, 8th edition (McGraw Hill Iriwn, Boston).Google Scholar
  12. O'Reilly, C. A., III and J. Pfeer 2000, Hidden value: How great Companies Achieve Extraordinary Results with Ordinary People (Harvard Business School Press, Boston).Google Scholar
  13. Rhoades, L. and R. Eisenberger: 2002, 'Perceived organizational support: A review of the literature', Journal of Applied Psychology 87, 698–714.Google Scholar
  14. Rousseau, D. M. 1995, Psychological contracts in organizations (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
  15. Turillo, C. J., R. Folger, J. J. Lavelle, E. E. Umphress and J. O. Gee: 2002, 'Is virtue its own reward? Self-sacrificial decisions for the sake of fairness', Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 89, 839–865.Google Scholar
  16. Verplanken, B. and R. W. Holland: 2002, 'Motivated decision making: Effects of activation and self-centrality of values on choices and behavior', Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 82, 434–447.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Matt Bloom
    • 1
  1. 1.Mendoza College of BusinessUniversity of Notre DameNotre DameUSA

Personalised recommendations